Ahmad Arbery Trial.

[Cal20sailor 3,481]

8 minutes ago, Olsonist said:

I just got back from Thanksgiving dinner with my sister. She's a doc. One of her doctor friends was there and was a doctor at San Quentin among other prisons. She said life terms for being an accomplice, just hangin' with your buddy, is common.

The guy needed to say stop. He needed to call the cops. 'Just' videoing put him in accomplice territory and now he gets a cell with Bubba for the duration. Don't like it? Choose better friends. Make better decisions.

He tried to herd the guy with his truck.  I agree he is not in the  same guilt as the other two.  They're all going to wear Orange!

[Cal20sailor 3,481]

Three shots with a shotgun before he went down.  Jeff, did you teach Travis self-defense.  

[Sol Rosenberg 10,187]

6 hours ago, jzk said:

Let's be honest.  The defendant was not a jogger, but rather a criminal.  He still has a right to a fair trial and prison vs. being killed.

 

51 minutes ago, The Joker said:

Someone hit the Thanksgiving bourbon hard.

Unlike the reaction to the Rittenhouse decision  No one, repeat no one is criticizing the jury or their decision in this case.   
 

Okay bullshitter. 

[AJ Oliver 1,926]

13 hours ago, The Joker said:

Did you even watch the trial?

bull pucky you liar, that vid does not come close to showing what you claim.

. . . just a few irate folks mostly R-wordista rioters 

[AJ Oliver 1,926]

12 hours ago, Cal20sailor said:

I have a BS and MS in engineering from UMich (79,83)

Well, nobody's perfect  . . 

Go Bucks !! 

(And we still have to go sailing . . . ) 

[AJ Oliver 1,926]

7 hours ago, Mark K said:

When they picked up their 2nd Amendment they thought that would protect them. 

No my friend, they thought that good ol' boy justice would protect them. 

And they would have been right if that vid had not been leaked. 

[jzk 1,735]

8 hours ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

 

Okay bullshitter. 

Who is criticizing the jury verdict?

[jzk 1,735]

11 hours ago, Cal20sailor said:

Seriously?  You either didn't watch the trial or are the dumbest motherfucker that ever darkened the halls in Champaign.

What would his sentence be if he didn't use the camera?

[jzk 1,735]

10 hours ago, SloopJonB said:

JerKZ true colours come out.

If he'd been there with his soul brothers he'd now be facing a life term

Well if it isn't the biggest piece of shit on the forum.  The guy that hopes they make Ivermectin toxic to humans, so that it will harm people with whom he disagrees.  I believe he also said that climate change is real, but he doesn't give a fuck, so he drives a supercharged V8.

[Cal20sailor 3,481]

45 minutes ago, jzk said:

What would his sentence be if he didn't use the camera?

Without the camera in GA?  They don't get charged.  That should scare all of us.

[The Joker 540]

3 minutes ago, Cal20sailor said:

Without the camera in GA?  They don't get charged.  That should scare all of us.

Yep.  

[The Joker 540]

9 hours ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

 

Okay bullshitter. 

How’s the hangover?   

[Bus Driver 6,904]

5 minutes ago, Cal20sailor said:

Without the camera in GA?  They don't get charged.  That should scare all of us.

That original prosecutor should be disbarred, as soon as possible. 

No fucking way she should ever be allowed to be involved in legal matters except as a defendant.

[Sol Rosenberg 10,187]

1 hour ago, jzk said:

Who is criticizing the jury verdict?

Set the record straight by telling us you agree with the verdict and I will admit error.  Include an explanation of how calling the dead guy the defendant is not disagreeing with the verdict. 

[The Joker 540]

8 hours ago, AJ Oliver said:

bull pucky you liar, that vid does not come close to showing what you claim.

. . . just a few irate folks mostly R-wordista rioters 

It shows exactly what I claimed.    I stated that the jury in the Rittenhouse case should have been sequestered.  I stand by that.    The video shows a group of people one with a bullhorn yelling no justice no peace.  It was reported that it was loud enough to hear in the court house.   The jury was deliberating in the courthouse.   The jury left and arrived each day hearing the protestors.  They even had an MSNBC producer chase their bus trying to get their pictures.   They went home each night and ran the risk of seeing or hearing about the trial.   If sequestered none of that happens.  

[The Joker 540]

2 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

Set the record straight by telling us you agree with the verdict and I will admit error. 

Set the record straight and admit your race baiting rant was based on zero evidence.  Bullshitter. 

[The Joker 540]

12 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

That original prosecutor should be disbarred, as soon as possible. 

No fucking way she should ever be allowed to be involved in legal matters except as a defendant.

Already arrested and out.  I don’t think she can practice while under indictment.  If convicted I’m sure disbarment is automatic. 

[Cal20sailor 3,481]

6 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

Set the record straight by telling us you agree with the verdict and I will admit error. 

I actually think the verdict was a bit harsh to the 3rd guy, the cameraman.  I still believe 5-7 max but someone earlier talked about mandatories.

[Cal20sailor 3,481]

8 minutes ago, The Joker said:

Set the record straight and admit your race baiting rant was based on zero evidence.  Bullshitter. 

Taken right out of a 6yos playbook.  Answer the question and then state your issues!

[Sol Rosenberg 10,187]

1 minute ago, Cal20sailor said:

I actually think the verdict was a bit harsh to the 3rd guy, the cameraman.  I still believe 5-7 max but someone earlier talked about mandatories.

It is harsh at first glance. Then look at the arguments and evidence from the trial to see what the jury had to work with. He was part of the hunt. They used the two trucks to get the guy trapped “like a rat”. Felony assault. Add the dead body and it’s felony murder. Don’t forget that they got away with it at first, just like the good old days…when Murica was great. 

[jzk 1,735]

21 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

Set the record straight by telling us you agree with the verdict and I will admit error.  Include an explanation of how calling the dead guy the defendant is not disagreeing with the verdict. 

I agree with the verdict.  Remember what they were trying to do.  They were trying to arrest a "criminal suspect." I said that the suspect deserves to be a defendant in a trial vs. being killed right there and then.

[Bus Driver 6,904]

3 minutes ago, jzk said:

I agree with the verdict.  Remember what they were trying to do.  They were trying to arrest a "criminal suspect." I said that the suspect deserves to be a defendant in a trial vs. being killed right there and then.

No.  You didn't say they were trying to arrest a "criminal suspect".  You called him a "criminal".

16 hours ago, jzk said:

Let's be honest.  The defendant was not a jogger, but rather a criminal.  He still has a right to a fair trial and prison vs. being killed.

 

[Sol Rosenberg 10,187]

4 minutes ago, jzk said:

I agree with the verdict.  Remember what they were trying to do.  They were trying to arrest a "criminal suspect." I said that the suspect deserves to be a defendant in a trial vs. being killed right there and then.

Do you agree with all of the verdicts? 

[Cal20sailor 3,481]

24 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

It is harsh at first glance. Then look at the arguments and evidence from the trial to see what the jury had to work with. He was part of the hunt. They used the two trucks to get the guy trapped “like a rat”. Felony assault. Add the dead body and it’s felony murder. Don’t forget that they got away with it at first, just like the good old days…when Murica was great. 

I just think he might be a decent guy who was suckered in by two neighbor racists out on a coon hunt.  Due to racial biases, how many families  have been ruined.

[Sol Rosenberg 10,187]

7 minutes ago, Cal20sailor said:

I just think he might be a decent guy who was suckered in by two neighbor racists out on a coon hunt.  Due to racial biases, how many families  have been ruined.

That’s my take as well, especially it it was true that he didn’t know the two goobers were armed. His life is ruined because he followed the urging of someone who told 911 that his emergency was a black man running down his street. 
 

Felony murder is very broad. Once the jury determines that someone committed a felony, as this one did for assault (x 2 for trying it on the other street) and false imprisonment (seeing past the citizens arrest bullshit), they’re on that hook. 
 

The lesson is, don’t follow dumb fucks and bullshitters. 

[Cal20sailor 3,481]

2 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

That’s my take as well, especially it it was true that he didn’t know the two goobers were armed. His life is ruined because he followed the urging of someone who told 911 that his emergency was a black man running down his street. 
 

Felony murder is very broad. Once the jury determines that someone committed a felony, as this one did for assault (x 2 for trying it on the other street) and false imprisonment (seeing past the citizens arrest bullshit), they’re on that hook. 
 

The lesson is, don’t follow dumb fucks and bullshitters. 

Just very sad, but just.  A black guy runs past my place, we don't call the police, we call it Monday, Tuesday...

[Sol Rosenberg 10,187]

5 minutes ago, Cal20sailor said:

Just very sad, but just.  A black guy runs past my place, we don't call the police, we call it Monday, Tuesday...

I have a boat ramp at the end of my street, so I see black, white and brown folks walking past my house with their fishing or shrimping gear daily. I call it feeding their families. Mostly nice people. It is amazing how decent most folks are when one talks with them instead of chasing them with trucks. Of course there are a few assholes, just like this place. 

[jzk 1,735]

1 hour ago, Bus Driver said:

No.  You didn't say they were trying to arrest a "criminal suspect".  You called him a "criminal".

 

Yeah, that too.  Where is the factual error?

[jzk 1,735]

1 hour ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

Do you agree with all of the verdicts? 

Weren't you supposed to admit your error by now?

[Sol Rosenberg 10,187]

7 minutes ago, jzk said:

Weren't you supposed to admit your error by now?

I didn’t make an error. Your Bullshitter word games won’t cut it. 
 

Do you approve of all of the verdicts?

[Cal20sailor 3,481]

6 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

I didn’t make an error. Your Bullshitter word games won’t cut it. 
 

Do you approve of all of the verdicts?

I do.

[Sol Rosenberg 10,187]

Just now, Cal20sailor said:

I do.

As do I. Juries gonna jury. 

[Raz'r 5,195]

16 minutes ago, jzk said:

Weren't you supposed to admit your error by now?

The error that you defined the victim as a criminal? That’s on you. Might work in Kenosha under a certain judge, but not when a jury sees through it.

[Cal20sailor 3,481]

There were a shitfull of charges against 3 men in an area known for racism.  

Well done to the jury.

[jzk 1,735]

9 minutes ago, Raz'r said:

The error that you defined the victim as a criminal? That’s on you. Might work in Kenosha under a certain judge, but not when a jury sees through it.

So many morons on this forum.  How did you all find each other?

[jzk 1,735]

21 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

I didn’t make an error. Your Bullshitter word games won’t cut it. 
 

Do you approve of all of the verdicts?

You: Set the record straight by telling us you agree with the verdict and I will admit error.

Me: I agree with the verdict.

Looks like you are going back on your word.  No surprise.

[Sol Rosenberg 10,187]

5 minutes ago, jzk said:

You: Set the record straight by telling us you agree with the verdict and I will admit error.

Me: I agree with the verdict.

Looks like you are going back on your word.  No surprise.

I thought you would play it honestly and tell us what you really thought. 
 

I admit my error on that point. 

[jzk 1,735]

4 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

I thought you would play it honestly and tell us what you really thought. 
 

I admit my error on that point. 

Now you are just lying.  Seems like your word is not worth much of anything.

[Sol Rosenberg 10,187]

14 minutes ago, jzk said:

Now you are just lying.  Seems like your word is not worth much of anything.

Okay bullshitter. 

[Bus Driver 6,904]

1 hour ago, jzk said:

Yeah, that too.  Where is the factual error?

Jesus.  You identified Ahmaud Arbery not only as a criminal, but said he had a "right to....prison".

Don't ever fucking let the words "innocent until proven guilty" emanate from your lips or fingertips.

[The Joker 540]

8 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

Jesus.  You identified Ahmaud Arbery not only as a criminal, but said he had a "right to....prison".

Don't ever fucking let the words "innocent until proven guilty" emanate from your lips or fingertips.

Not directed at you in particular, but in the Rittenhouse case he is still being called a murderer despite the juries decision.  

[Bus Driver 6,904]

14 minutes ago, The Joker said:

Not directed at you in particular, but in the Rittenhouse case he is still being called a murderer despite the juries decision.  

So? 

I do my best not to engage in behavior I find odious.

[jzk 1,735]

25 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

Jesus.  You identified Ahmaud Arbery not only as a criminal, but said he had a "right to....prison".

Don't ever fucking let the words "innocent until proven guilty" emanate from your lips or fingertips.

Here is the point for the slow people.   Let's use a hypothetical.   Let's say that there is a criminal running down the street, and citizens want to make a citizens arrest.  Well they can't just kill that criminal.  That criminal deserves a trial and, if convicted and sentenced, jail vs. death on the spot.

How is that?  Are you able to understand that?  

[AJ Oliver 1,926]

3 hours ago, The Joker said:

It shows exactly what I claimed.

Just can't own up to your lies can you ?? 

Outside was a group of several dozen, a goodly number of which were fascists of your elk. 

https://www.jsonline.com/videos/news/2021/11/17/scene-outside-kenosha-court-jury-deliberates-rittenhouse-trial/8644982002/

[Steam Flyer 8,431]

1 hour ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

1 hour ago, jzk said:

...   ...

I thought you would play it honestly and tell us what you really thought. 
 

I admit my error on that point. 

   he said "thought" heh heh heh

- DSK

[jzk 1,735]

36 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

Jesus.  You identified Ahmaud Arbery not only as a criminal, but said he had a "right to....prison".

Don't ever fucking let the words "innocent until proven guilty" emanate from your lips or fingertips.

Arbery was trespassing on camera several times.  That makes him a criminal.  He has a criminal record too.  That also makes him a criminal.  He was a criminal. 

But, even as a criminal, he gets a trial before being punished.  He doesn't deserve to be killed on the side of the road by these clowns.

But be honest.  He wasn't just a "jogger."  He was a criminal.  

[AJ Oliver 1,926]

3 hours ago, The Joker said:

 I stand by that.    The video shows a group of people one with a bullhorn yelling no justice no peace.  It was reported that it was loud enough to hear in the court house.   The jury was deliberating in the courthouse.  

And don't try to change what you wrote, which was this. That there were audible threats to  . .  

"Major mistake to not sequester this jury.  They are hearing the threats from the mob that they will burn the town down if he is acquitted small town there has to be some concern by the jury."  

[Bus Driver 6,904]

I am sure The Joker is happy you've come to his aid.

Remind me when Arbery was tried for trespassing.

[Sol Rosenberg 10,187]

911 what is your emergency?

there’s a black man running down the street. 

[jzk 1,735]

3 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

I am sure The Joker is happy you've come to his aid.

Remind me when Arbery was tried for trespassing.

He wasn't because these assholes killed him.  But he is on video.  If he is on video trespassing, then it is ok to say he is a criminal.  However, it is not ok for the government to punish him until they prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he is guilty.  Do you see the difference?  There is no such requirement here on an internet forum.  We can just view the video and say he was trespassing.

[jzk 1,735]

4 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

911 what is your emergency?

there’s a black man running down the street. 

This is the misrepresentation.

He wasn't just a law abiding citizen going for a jog and then 3 people killed him because he was a black person in their neighborhood.

He was seen on video trespassing, so these three decided they would "arrest" him and in doing so they killed him which is murder, and they were so convicted of such.

But why the need to misrepresent the facts of the case?

[Sol Rosenberg 10,187]

10 minutes ago, jzk said:

This is the misrepresentation.

He wasn't just a law abiding citizen going for a jog and then 3 people killed him because he was a black person in their neighborhood.

He was seen on video trespassing, so these three decided they would "arrest" him and in doing so they killed him which is murder, and they were so convicted of such.

But why the need to misrepresent the facts of the case?

Perhaps if you had watched the trial you would have heard the 911 call that Greggy Reb made.  
You might not want to hear it, but the jury did  

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/582968-arbery-jury-asks-to-see-videos-hear-911-call

[Bus Driver 6,904]

10 minutes ago, jzk said:

He wasn't because these assholes killed him.  But he is on video.  If he is on video trespassing, then it is ok to say he is a criminal.  However, it is not ok for the government to punish him until they prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he is guilty.  Do you see the difference?  There is no such requirement here on an internet forum.  We can just view the video and say he was trespassing.

The police officer who was looking for him was going to give him a warning. 

He sure didn't feel the need to label Mr. Arbery a criminal, like you and The Joker do.

[jzk 1,735]

1 minute ago, Bus Driver said:

The police officer who was looking for him was going to give him a warning. 

He sure didn't feel the need to label Mr. Arbery a criminal, like you and The Joker do.

Do cops often give people warnings for not committing crimes?

Just because he was a criminal doesn't mean he should be hunted down and killed.  But, he wasn't just a law abiding citizen going out for a jog.  So why the need to tell that lie?

[Raz'r 5,195]

53 minutes ago, jzk said:

Here is the point for the slow people.   Let's use a hypothetical.   Let's say that there is a criminal running down the street, and citizens want to make a citizens arrest.  Well they can't just kill that criminal.  That criminal deserves a trial and, if convicted and sentenced, jail vs. death on the spot.

How is that?  Are you able to understand that?  

So why do you label the victim, a criminal? There was no evidence these vigilantes could point to, hence they are in jail. Why do you continue the fiction?

[Raz'r 5,195]

44 minutes ago, jzk said:

Arbery was trespassing on camera several times.  That makes him a criminal.  He has a criminal record too.  That also makes him a criminal.  He was a criminal. 

But, even as a criminal, he gets a trial before being punished.  He doesn't deserve to be killed on the side of the road by these clowns.

But be honest.  He wasn't just a "jogger."  He was a criminal.  

The jury disagrees with your racist conclusion.

[Ishmael 10,630]

1 minute ago, Raz'r said:

55 minutes ago, jzk said:

Here is the point for the slow people.   Let's use a hypothetical.   Let's say that there is a criminal running down the street, and citizens want to make a citizens arrest.  Well they can't just kill that criminal.  That criminal deserves a trial and, if convicted and sentenced, jail vs. death on the spot.

How is that?  Are you able to understand that?  

So why do you label the victim, a criminal? There was no evidence these vigilantes could point to, hence they are in jail. Why do you continue the fiction?

He is either very obtuse, or very stupid, or a blatant racist, or a combination of all three. He seems to be a disgusting human being. 

[Raz'r 5,195]

37 minutes ago, jzk said:

This is the misrepresentation.

He wasn't just a law abiding citizen going for a jog and then 3 people killed him because he was a black person in their neighborhood.

He was seen on video trespassing, so these three decided they would "arrest" him and in doing so they killed him which is murder, and they were so convicted of such.

But why the need to misrepresent the facts of the case?

Another lie for the Win! 

[Sol Rosenberg 10,187]

6 minutes ago, Raz'r said:

So why do you label the victim, a criminal? There was no evidence these vigilantes could point to, hence they are in jail. Why do you continue the fiction?

The jury called it false imprisonment, a felony that formed the basis of the felony murder convictions. But don’t worry, our bullshitters agree with the jury on all of the verdicts. 

[Raz'r 5,195]

2 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

The jury called it false imprisonment, a felony that formed the basis of the felony murder convictions. But don’t worry, our bullshitters agree with the jury on all of the verdicts. 

I think this particular bullshitter is bullshittin so hard, as this case is another example of the failure of the libertarian ideal of people being responsible for their own policing.

[Sol Rosenberg 10,187]

14 minutes ago, Raz'r said:

I think this particular bullshitter is bullshittin so hard, as this case is another example of the failure of the libertarian ideal of people being responsible for their own policing.

It wasn’t long ago that this murder would not have raised an eyebrow. Hell, the original prosecutor is facing charges stemming from this case because she tried to make it go away. Had the idiots not released the video she would have succeeded. 
LBJ was spot on with his lowest white man quote. We see several of them here. 

[Cal20sailor 3,481]

1 hour ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

911 what is your emergency?

there’s a black man running down the street. 

You just have to lead them a bit.

[jzk 1,735]

46 minutes ago, Raz'r said:

So why do you label the victim, a criminal? There was no evidence these vigilantes could point to, hence they are in jail. Why do you continue the fiction?

That is not anywhere near true.  Even though he was a criminal, they cant kill him.

[jzk 1,735]

43 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

The jury called it false imprisonment, a felony that formed the basis of the felony murder convictions. But don’t worry, our bullshitters agree with the jury on all of the verdicts. 

How is it mutually exclusive?

[Sean 2,843]

3 minutes ago, jzk said:

That is not anywhere near true.  Even though he was a criminal, they cant kill him.

Is this why you keep calling the victim a “criminal”?
Have you ever checked out a construction site out of curiosity? I certainly have. Guess I must be a criminal. So shoot me.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/13/us/ahmaud-arbery-wednesday-surveillance-video/index.html

Excerpt -

(CNN)The owner of a home under construction in the Georgia neighborhood where Ahmaud Arbery was killed says he had reported no crime after surveillance video seemed to show the young man on the property. 

The February 23 footage, captured moments before Arbery's death, appears to show him looking around but never touching anything -- and eventually, walking away.

[jzk 1,735]

1 minute ago, Sean said:

Is this why you keep calling the victim a “criminal”?
Have you ever checked out a construction site out of curiosity? I certainly have. Guess I must be a criminal. So shoot me.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/13/us/ahmaud-arbery-wednesday-surveillance-video/index.html

Excerpt -

(CNN)The owner of a home under construction in the Georgia neighborhood where Ahmaud Arbery was killed says he had reported no crime after surveillance video seemed to show the young man on the property. 

The February 23 footage, captured moments before Arbery's death, appears to show him looking around but never touching anything -- and eventually, walking away.

Well maybe you are.  But if so, you don't deserve to be killed either.  And maybe you have a criminal record like he does.  Still don't deserve to be killed.

I don't know why this is so hard.  Even if he wasn't just a neighborly jogger, he still doesn't deserve to get killed.

[Sean 2,843]

3 minutes ago, jzk said:

Well maybe you are.  But if so, you don't deserve to be killed either.  And maybe you have a criminal record like he does.  Still don't deserve to be killed.

I don't know why this is so hard.  Even if he wasn't just a neighborly jogger, he still doesn't deserve to get killed.

Do yourself a favor; stop referring to the victim as “criminal” for being curious about an inactive construction site. It’s getting old. 

[jzk 1,735]

2 minutes ago, Sean said:

Do yourself a favor; stop referring to the victim as “criminal” for being curious about an inactive construction site. It’s getting old. 

The point here is that even criminals don't deserve to just get hunted down and shot.   Why did they have a camera at the construction site?

[SloopJonB 12,609]

5 minutes ago, Sean said:

Do yourself a favor; stop referring to the victim as “criminal” for being curious about an inactive construction site. It’s getting old. 

He would need a lot of favours to even attain the intellect of a clam.

[Sol Rosenberg 10,187]

30 minutes ago, jzk said:

How is it mutually exclusive?

I have no doubt that you would like to have it both ways, but it is enough that you agree with the jury that it was false imprisonment, not citizens arrest. The rest is pablum. 

[Sean 2,843]

10 minutes ago, jzk said:

Why did they have a camera at the construction site?

Would have come in handy if Arbery was a thief rather than a curious jogger no? Come to think of it, I have a couple cameras at my house. When I was a contractor, I always had a camera on site. 
Your horse is dead. You can stop beating it now. 

[jzk 1,735]

12 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

I have no doubt that you would like to have it both ways, but it is enough that you agree with the jury that it was false imprisonment, not citizens arrest. The rest is pablum. 

The point, dipshit, is that you can't just hunt down criminals and kill them.

[jzk 1,735]

11 minutes ago, Sean said:

Would have come in handy if Arbery was a thief rather than a curious jogger no? Come to think of it, I have a couple cameras at my house. When I was a contractor, I always had a camera on site. 
Your horse is dead. You can stop beating it now. 

Yeah, I have cameras as well, and it is not to protect myself from "joggers."

[Sol Rosenberg 10,187]

4 minutes ago, jzk said:

The point, dipshit, is that you can't just hunt down criminals and kill them.

Look at those goalposts move! 
 

That wasn’t what the jury decided, Sooper Genius. 

[Cal20sailor 3,481]

1 hour ago, jzk said:

That is not anywhere near true.  Even though he was a criminal, they cant kill him.

What crime?  

[Cal20sailor 3,481]

44 minutes ago, jzk said:

Yeah, I have cameras as well, and it is not to protect myself from "joggers."

Voyeur...didn't see that one coming.  A++++++

[jzk 1,735]

1 hour ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

Look at those goalposts move! 
 

That wasn’t what the jury decided, Sooper Genius. 

Which of the verdicts said he wasn't a criminal?

[The Joker 540]

3 hours ago, AJ Oliver said:

Just can't own up to your lies can you ?? 

Outside was a group of several dozen, a goodly number of which were fascists of your elk. 

https://www.jsonline.com/videos/news/2021/11/17/scene-outside-kenosha-court-jury-deliberates-rittenhouse-trial/8644982002/

What lies asshole?    Your video confirms exactly what I said.  

[The Joker 540]

3 hours ago, Bus Driver said:

I am sure The Joker is happy you've come to his aid.

Remind me when Arbery was tried for trespassing.

Why are you bringing me into this conversation?   

[The Joker 540]

3 hours ago, AJ Oliver said:

And don't try to change what you wrote, which was this. That there were audible threats to  . .  

"Major mistake to not sequester this jury.  They are hearing the threats from the mob that they will burn the town down if he is acquitted small town there has to be some concern by the jury."  

Correct where is the lie.  “No justice! No Peace! “. 

[The Joker 540]

3 hours ago, Bus Driver said:

The police officer who was looking for him was going to give him a warning. 

He sure didn't feel the need to label Mr. Arbery a criminal, like you and The Joker do.

WTF. I never said anything like that.  

[AJ Oliver 1,926]

3 minutes ago, The Joker said:

Correct where is the lie.  “No justice! No Peace! “. 

You evil-assed jerk face . . 

"No justice! No peace" is not the same as . . 

threats from the mob that they will burn the town down 

[The Joker 540]

1 minute ago, AJ Oliver said:

You evil-assed jerk face . . 

"No justice! No peace" is not the same as . . 

threats from the mob that they will burn the town down 

If you lived there what do you think no peace would mean?  

 

[Fakenews 1,560]

3 hours ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

911 what is your emergency?

there’s a black man running down the street. 

I think you proved Jerkz’s point.  That’s a crime in that neighborhood.

[AJ Oliver 1,926]

5 minutes ago, The Joker said:

If you lived there what do you think no peace would mean?

keep digging . . . 

at the marches I have attended, which have been many, 

"no justice, no peace" 

means non-violent direct action. 

You liar. 

[Fakenews 1,560]

1 hour ago, jzk said:

Yeah, I have cameras as well, and it is not to protect myself from "joggers."

We know.  It’s to protect you from “the blacks”.

SAD!

[Fakenews 1,560]

Jerkz is not alone in his hatred of “the blacks”.  Most of the GOP think that way.

https://www.mediaite.com/news/arbery-killers-guilty-poll-republicans-democrats/