• The Forum will be unavailable on March 27, 2023 from 8:AM to 12:00 PM EST for maintenance.

Search results

  1. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    One officer of the company was specifically named.
  2. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    Duck...It does not.
  3. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    In a separate civil filing.
  4. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    If Trump Inc. is found guilty does that mean that he committed the crime?
  5. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    I know, she can, and has, partnered with the county AG to bring a criminal case against Trump org. She could do the same against Trump himself if she thought she could meet the higher standard of proof. Apparently, she doesn't believe she can prove a crime.
  6. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    WTF!....Of course she does. She's party to the criminal case against Trumps business.
  7. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    If she could have charged a crime, she would have.
  8. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    There is no crime alleged here, it's a civil suit.
  9. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    I don't believe that part.
  10. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    I believe Trump is not named in the criminal case because it's true. Does the truth factor into what you believe about Trump?
  11. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    Simple....Trump is not named in that case and is not being tried for criminal fraud.
  12. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    I didn't believe it when Trump told it, or when Hillary told it, or when Abrams told it, or when Gore told it....
  13. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    It's not that I like Trump, I don't. It's that I don't appreciate the Democrat's bullshit and Trump has a way of exposing it.
  14. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    Yes you are. You said Trump was charged with a crime. You said he lied on his tax return. The first is false, the second you can't know. You're just making shit up.
  15. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    Well, you claim Trump did, but you don't know that you just made that up.
  16. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    That's what I thought. You're claiming he is named in a criminal case in which he is not named. And the part about lying on his tax forms, you just made that up.
  17. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    Really, what criminal charge is that?
  18. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    And, if you negotiate a value with your tax assessor you are not responsible if a bank uses that value to make their own loan decisions. The bank decided on its own to use that assessed value.
  19. Dog 2.0

    More trouble for the Orange Jesus

    Banks are responsible for their own assessment; they don't automatically accept whatever valuation you negotiate with the tax assessor. And BTW, around here tax assessments are reviewed only every 5 years. Valuations can change a lot in 5 years.
Top