Search results

Golly, I wonder what this is going to be about?

And it's the smartest, least crazy, she's ever sounded. Usually she can't put two sentences together without seeming like somebody's drunk paranoid Mom who thinks she's in a movie.

This little bit of bullshit has been debunked by several including Mark Esper. But the RWNJs love to keep repeating their favorite lies. Kind of like Sucker7's claim that I was going to be in big trouble with Mark Levin's lawyers.

Or the trolls you can afford, after the oligarchs take their hefty cut off the top

Goodness, you've really been practicing your tap-dancing skills since last time! Please give cites of all the times Schumer and Waters held secret planning meetings with their potentially-violent followers, who then showed up and built a gallows at the site of where they were being told "fight...

He did more than that, he sent two tweets egging the crowd on. Specifically targeted VP Pence, which seems like conspiracy and incitement. If Trump had thought ahead to putting a few of his loyalist SS agents on Pence's security detail, it would have been very different.

All of whom were guilty of colluding/conspiring with Trump to overthrow the election. Guess what, we didn't give the Japanese any seats on the Pearl Harbor investigating committee, either. Every single person whose testimony has been made public is a Republican. Their statements are made under...

Have they refused to allow anybody to testify? Not heard any such thing. And everybody they have asked in to testify has been a Republican connected to the events. If your man wants to tell the truth, he could walk into the J6 Committee interview room any time, they're on recess but their...

"Flood the zone with bullshit" Until you get dragged into court and face perjury....

In case anybody thinks the Trumpublican coup attempt was something original or clever: https://news.yahoo.com/iraq-clerics-followers-camped-parliament-130455089.html

That may be an over-estimate. And I think most of them know, or strongly suspect, and it makes them angry. Look at Surfboi7

And nothing ever will prove it, to you. And you'll be proud of that, I bet. OTOH there is the facts, then there's bullshit. Mark Levin has not ever gone into a courtroom and testified as to the truth of the things he says, and I predict he never will. His buddy Cucker Tarlson sort of tried...

You want me to PROVE that Mark Levin says things in which he expresses hatred of Nancy Pelosi? Do you think he likes Nancy Pelosi? {edit to add} I am not a bit surprised that you have all his podcasts on speed-dial. Go back and read my actual post, dumbass.

They testified about numerous statements Trump made... which they heard... in which he said he lost, or that Biden won. Really? You want to put Mark Levin in a courtroom where he will suffer legal consequences if he does not tell the truth? OK, let's go. It'll be a hoot!

per Cassidy Hutchinson (Mark Meadows chief assistant), Trump and Meadows and the entire security staff knew there were a lot of weapons in the crowd, because the crowd was being turned away at the gate with the magnetic weapon detectors. Trump tried to order them to remove the detectors.

Actually that is not true. Trump knows quite well he lost the election, as per testimony (ie what you say when you have to tell the truth or suffer consequences) of Ivanka & Jared and several others on his staff. He just finds it more convenient and profitable to lie.... and avoid testifying...

But they also contradict themselves, almost constantly. For example, on a long drive a couple of days ago, flipping radio channels at random, I listened to Mark Levin for about 15~20 minutes... he was going on and on and on about Nancy Pelosi, with a guest who apparently was somebody in the...

Right. An armed demonstration, planned a month or so in advance by Trump's inner circle of advisors, paid for by Trump political contributors, coordinated with Trump's hand-picked appointees within the security services including Dept. of Defense, which Trump watched "get out of control" for 3...

He's not The Walrus, he's the War Walrus

Nah, Arnold was easily ten times the general Flynn is. He actually fought and actually won battles. Not only that, he raised funds and recruited and trained soldiers himself. Ironically, the US would almost certainly not have won the 1774~1781 war without him. Flynn is a marginally-competent...