Search results

Reg changes benefiting Oracle is arguable, meaining resonable people could disagree on weather or not Oracle might be signicantly advantaged by the change (weather that was the intent is irelavent) You seem to be saying that becos it is knot currantly knowabel, ETNZ should have shut up and sat...

wehn you say 'comply with' dont you really mean 'fully exploite" ETNZ and LR do comply currantly, supposably