jack_sparrow
Super Anarchist
- 37,393
- 5,094
Could have said we learned our lesson that having a cry on TV doesn't cut the mustard.Great comments by Mark Bradford.
Could have said we learned our lesson that having a cry on TV doesn't cut the mustard.Great comments by Mark Bradford.
I’m well aware of, and respect the rules governing our, to me, beloved sport. WOIx, imho, violated those rules as evidenced by the lack of transmission data from their boat. If ours was a true Corinthian sport, they should have withdrawn based on the fact they did not follow the rules, involuntary, or otherwise. Who of us hasn’t finished a race only to find we were declared OCS and have sworn that we weren’t over and that we complied with the rules? I’ve never won that argument, but i’m not worth $1.5B either. Pathetic.Maybe u could explain there are rules about protests too. All rules should be adhered to.
So much conjecture and anecdotal emotional ramblings here. You even pulled the rich card which is insulting to Richard Greens PC common sense prevailed.I’m well aware of, and respect the rules governing our, to me, beloved sport. WOIx, imho, violated those rules as evidenced by the lack of transmission data from their boat. If ours was a true Corinthian sport, they should have withdrawn based on the fact they did not follow the rules, involuntary, or otherwise. Who of us hasn’t finished a race only to find we were declared OCS and have sworn that we weren’t over and that we complied with the rules? I’ve never won that argument, but i’m not worth $1.5B either. Pathetic.
Russell Green not Richard, I know you Wellingtonians struggle with the JAFAsSo much conjecture and anecdotal emotional ramblings here you even pulled the rich card which is insulting to Richard Greens PC common sense prevailed
You can't say "but the rules " but not respect them when it comes to the protest part. You can't cherry pick
You really need some perspective give and not lead with emotional conspiracy rich guy bollox
You were asking how to explain it to non sailors. You’re all over the shop with your opinions. The protest was dismissed.I’m well aware of, and respect the rules governing our, to me, beloved sport. WOIx, imho, violated those rules as evidenced by the lack of transmission data from their boat. If ours was a true Corinthian sport, they should have withdrawn based on the fact they did not follow the rules, involuntary, or otherwise. Who of us hasn’t finished a race only to find we were declared OCS and have sworn that we weren’t over and that we complied with the rules? I’ve never won that argument, but i’m not worth $1.5B either. Pathetic.
Fair call right thereRussell Green not Richard, I know you Wellingtonians struggle with the JAFAs
If it can be picked up by terrestrial stations it can be picked up by satellites. If it was properly transmitting in Sydney the sats would've seen it.EddyAllTime said:Look at the sources - WOXI was only ever picked up by the terrestrial stations. Could genuinely be an equipment problem if not picking up and satellites...
Very nitpicky, but it was not dismissed. That would suggest exoneration.You were asking how to explain it to non sailors. You’re all over the shop with your opinions. The protest was dismissed.
Yes you can gauge by how many other yachts didnt have them on and how many have complained about them, seems Oats must be the only boat without the AIS.So many WO haters. Tall Poppy syndrome?
Just to get it right. The protest was declared invalid. Different to dismissed.You were asking how to explain it to non sailors. You’re all over the shop with your opinions. The protest was dismissed.
I think Sparrow addressed this earlier. Oatley products own this race with dosh and it's gonna take big balls to stand up which BJ could have done. But their balls are too small.Bullshit outcome. You can cheat if you are well connected. The Sydney Hobart is fu**ed.
Cant the race committee DSQ someone for a breach of the SIs? I wonder if the jury were more saying to the race committee, get your own house in order and don't make us do your dirty work.Very nitpicky, but it was not dismissed. That would suggest exoneration.
The protest was ruled invalid. It was ruled invalid by the application of the rules about protesting.
So the protest never progressed to a finding of facts. The findings that did occur were clear: the RC were right to check things, but they were not in a position to protest, that was the job of BJ. That comes back to the self policing aspect. This is a sport, not real life, there are no policemen and no department of public prosecutions. As a competitor, you are duty bound to perform your role in the enforcement of the rules. You don't get to have it done by proxy if you will be advantaged by the result. And the rules are totally clear on this.
One might argue (and I will) that the RC were asleep at the wheel, and should have been independently checking on the AIS transmissions across the fleet. The rule was there. But they didn't. BJ noticed, but instead of taking up their duty, they went for trial by media. That wasn't a good look, and they should not have been advantaged by doing so, and they were not.