Forourselves
Super Anarchist
Infotrack, nothing said about her? No outrage at her, no allegations of cheating? Come on guys, be consistent, why don't you call Bouwe Bekking, Stu Bannatyne and Chris Nicholson cheats?
Doesn't your label of "Greatest Supermaxi" make your boyfriend Max super jealous?....oops.. silly me. sheep don't follow sailing..Only to you. The rest will remember her for being the greatest supermaxi of her time.
Wow. A sheep joke? Really? The best you could come up with was a sheep joke...amateur.Doesn't your label of "Greatest Supermaxi" make your boyfriend Max super jealous?....oops.. silly me. sheep don't follow sailing..
Sitting behind the 100' pack for the most of the race, any advantage gained, if indeed that intentional RX switch off did occur at times (not entire racetrack unlike WOXI) during the race, realistically even to HC contenders, meant what?Infotrack, nothing said about her? No outrage at her, no allegations of cheating? Come on guys, be consistent, why don't you call Bouwe Bekking, Stu Bannatyne and Chris Nicholson cheats?
Wait, so if you cheat (allegedly)and win, you deserve to be hated, but if you cheat (allegedly) and lose, thats okay?Sitting behind the pack for the most of the race, any advantage gained, if indeed that did occur, realistically even to HC contenders, meant what?
Not saying that at all. You first need to explain with reference to the RRS and SI's what InfoTrack can now do, then what anyone else on planet earth are capable of and could be bothered doing. Do that and you may engender a considered response.Wait, so if you cheat and win, you deserve to be hated, but if you cheat and lose, thats okay?
What?Not saying that at all. You first need to explain with reference to the RRS and SI's what InfoTrack can now do, then what anyone else on planet earth are capable of and could be bothered doing. Do that and you may engender a considered response.
Simple. Outline your complaint about InfoTrack with some detailed backup (as provided with regard to WOXI by many here) and outline what either InfoTrack or any other party should and can do? Unless you do that you blowing your assertion that InfoTrack cheated out of your arse. Once doing that you may then ponder that you are supporting the premise that WOXI cheated.What?
I'm not. I'm saying Infotracks AIS wasn't transmitting either, yet nothing has been said, no allegations of cheating, no outrage, no othing. It seems most of the fake outrage comes from people who are jealous of Wild Oats XI's achievements, or who just don't like Mark Richards.Simple. Outline your complaint about InfoTrack with some detailed backup (as provided with regard to WOXI by many here) and outline what either InfoTrack or any other party should and can do? Unless you do that you blowing your assertion that InfoTrack cheated out of your arse. Once doing that you may then ponder that you are supporting the premise that WOXI cheated.
This is what can happen when you don't follow the rules.Harburg was doomed the moment he opened his mouth instead of reaching for the red hanky on Wednesday.
Now I remember the side of smFcfollrauordurkesrelves that was giving me an itchy ignore button.
Fuck me Random, are you in therapy? I have agreed with you too many times recently.This is what can happen when you don't follow the rules.
The very worst outcome for everyone. The winner has been proven to cheat but wins anyway.
The second place lost because they didn't protest as required.
MR would have been better off in the long run being penalised, instead of taking the silverware as a cheat.
That would be like asking all the Tour de France riders who have ever been 'on the gear' at anytime in their sporting lives, to RAF on the Champs Elysee at the end of the race, for the good of the sport. Won't happen. Ever. Will we watch the Grande Depart next year? Of course!Infotrack should RAF that would make WOXI even worse cheaters
Not sure you have seen me on the soapbox here about the obligation that competitors have to call out fouls when they see them, even if they were not directly involved.Fuck me Random, are you in therapy? I have agreed with you too many times recently.This is what can happen when you don't follow the rules.
The very worst outcome for everyone. The winner has been proven to cheat but wins anyway.
The second place lost because they didn't protest as required.
MR would have been better off in the long run being penalised, instead of taking the silverware as a cheat.
Right, so after the data shows it was not transmitting, he claims it was 'turned on'. Not that it was Transmitting. You will notice that he as been very careful with his words now.After the hearing Richards was on Sydney TV news saying that the AIS was turned on the whole time. Harburg was also on saying that he never protests.
Oh well.
There hasn't been a hearing on WOXI's lack of AIS transmissions, so saying cheating has been proven is incorrect. In order to prove it, facts have to be found by a protest committee.... The winner has been proven to cheat but wins anyway.
...