Binnacle Bat
New member
Yes, cameras can distort things wicked, but mostly in wide angle lens situations. Crappy wide angle lens, tall building etc, and you can get all sorts of barrel distortion and need for perspective correction.Unfortunately you need to start paying a lot of attention to your lenses when you start wanting straight lines in real life to remain straight lines in photos, it's a common issue in architecture photography (the "falling backwards" effect if you stand at the base of a tall building and look up, for example), where they start using shift-tilt lenses: http://www.adorama.com/alc/files/41a7523241c64fb4f1f5f0aaf29dcb6b.jpgThanks again guys![]()
I drew some parallel lines on one of the pics. FH doesn't look well. Looks like the hulls are beginning to spread apart.
Also, I wonder if we might be seeing the "popping" of the seam as a result of dirt and crud getting into the weave of the glass from the tow, accentuating it compared to the relatively clean paint on the plywood above and below?
Almost all the shots we have seen of FH have been long shots, usually tightly cropped, from about the same level, so that barrel distortion and perspective distortion are minimal.
It's pretty clear to me looking at all the photos that the back porch was pretty flat at launch, but once the pseudo-harley & other stores were taken aboard, it started to sag, and the roof deck with it. The sag appeared to increase over time, until the hog, & HR, disappeared. Since then the sag seems to have stabilized.
The bending stresses of a sizable bike on the back porch are negligable compared those encountered in gale at sea, with a 1,000 miles or so of fetch.
By my calculations, by offloading the bike, the chances against the FH reaching Hawaii have decreased from 1:43,560 to 1:43,514.
Cheers
Allan