Well that's logical isn't it, they are the cup holders.So no Pete and Blair at Alinghi.
You'd think if those guys were involved in any way at Alinghi, Berterelli would have them front and centre.
Looks like Pete and Blair are at least considering ETNZ again.
There was a lot of speculation from many here who said Pete and Blair were headed to Alinghi.Well that's logical isn't it, they are the cup holders.
Brad Butterworth is old school from New Zealand origin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brad_Butterworth
View attachment 479203
Nationality Rules would bar them I would think. Hard to place Societe Nautiqe de Geneve as from an "Emerging Nation".So no Pete and Blair at Alinghi.
You'd think if those guys were involved in any way at Alinghi, Berterelli would have them front and centre.
Looks like Pete and Blair are at least considering ETNZ again.
You mean like another Coutts and Butterworth defection?There was a lot of speculation from many here who said Pete and Blair were headed to Alinghi.
Yep, Stingray and his little band of conspiracy theorists who said Pete and Blair were going to revolt against Dalts and take a whole lot of crew with them because he was considering SA.You mean like another Coutts and Butterworth defection?
Today it was confirmed, with a bit of a smile, that Switzerland is no emerging nation.Nationality Rules would bar them I would think. Hard to place Societe Nautiqe de Geneve as from an "Emerging Nation".
Besides it would be difficult for them to get there with the COVID restrictions - they were in New Zealand the night of the Sailor of the Year Awards
Well I reckon the Kiwis (ie. the great unwashed non-sailors) need to choose either help fund a home defence or shut the fuck up.Yep, Stingray and his little band of conspiracy theorists who said Pete and Blair were going to turn against Dalts because he was considering SA.
My bet is that Burling & Tuke will have no Involvement in AC37. They have won two times already and they have just announced that they're into SailGP for the long haul.So no Pete and Blair at Alinghi.
You'd think if those guys were involved in any way at Alinghi, Berterelli would have them front and centre.
Looks like Pete and Blair are at least considering ETNZ again.
Agreed! I said in another Thread Alinghis Entrance has considerably increased the chances of an Offshore Venue.Well I reckon the Kiwis (ie. the great unwashed non-sailors) need to choose either help fund a home defence or shut the fuck up.
As I have said on the forums and the FP (perhaps too many times), if they aren't matching the R&D of the challengers (and that costs real bucks) to produce a quick boat then an underfunded defence on the Huaraki Gulf would likely be the last home AC action New Zealand would see for some considerable time.
If a New Zealand team is struggling to raise funds as defender of "New Zealand's Cup" as PJ called it just what chance would they have or raising funds as just another challenger trying to win it back.
I think they’d have a great chance of raising funds for a challenge. When you challenge that’s all you are, challenging. There are no other aspects to consider, no TV, no venue, no nothing, just fielding a team and building a boat. That’s why Team NZ have been so good at it. It’s the defence that requires the big bucks.Well I reckon the Kiwis (ie. the great unwashed non-sailors) need to choose either help fund a home defence or shut the fuck up.
As I have said on the forums and the FP (perhaps too many times), if they aren't matching the R&D of the challengers (and that costs real bucks) to produce a quick boat then an underfunded defence on the Huaraki Gulf would likely be the last home AC action New Zealand would see for some considerable time.
If a New Zealand team is struggling to raise funds as defender of "New Zealand's Cup" as PJ called it just what chance would they have or raising funds as just another challenger trying to win it back.
"For training reasons" IS on the boat. Nice change.As I wrote above, from the presser:
- EB: Not talking about budget, but feel well resourced
- EB not on the boat! But on board for training reasons, if required
No shit, really?"For training reasons" IS on the boat. Nice change.
Which as I said elsewhere limits what they can help with compared to Merc and Ineos. The latter can use the F1 facilities to construct advanced composite foils etc. Presumably if Red Bull were to construct foils for Alinghi it would contravene the build in country rule.Red Bull sponsors Alinghi.
That rule was banned long ago, winches, sails all from the top supliers.Which as I said elsewhere limits what they can help with compared to Merc and Ineos. The latter can use the F1 facilities to construct advanced composite foils etc. Presumably if Red Bull were to construct foils for Alinghi it would contravene the build in country rule.
No there is a constructed in country rule currently in force from the protocol, it applies to the hull so it depends on wether the foils are included with that, the foil arms are not as they are one design.That rule was banned long ago, winches, sails all from the top supliers.
Not to mention her seemingly unbalanced and virtually uncontrollable, rudder.Could explain why they wanted Defiant that would follow along their design schemes. It was a very fast boat, just didn't have the lower sail area and volume of NZ and some possible foils control issues. NZ did lead the ultimate package design, but Defiant lead the way on many performance advantages (foil tip breaking the surface, extreme inverted bow, bat wing, sharp pointed keel line, etc...).