floater
Super Duper Anarchist
+1. Nothing goes down smoother that a Fosters.Airbus, HH, Parker, Quantum and BMW never have to participate in an America's Cup again - they will get free advertising every cup cycle even if AM exists or disappears
/cloudfront-ap-southeast-2.images.arcpublishing.com/nzme/GMT3UDG5KJNFMJM3OULSIMK654.jpg)
+1. Nothing goes down smoother that a Fosters.Airbus, HH, Parker, Quantum and BMW never have to participate in an America's Cup again - they will get free advertising every cup cycle even if AM exists or disappears
Is that so? I think you'd find the mathematics that describe wings that product downforce and foils that produce lift have more than a little in common, as well as some differences (air being compressible, water not so much). The subject of my 1st degree's dissertation, as it happens.I bet the teams responsible for keeping four wheels on the ground less than useless for lifting a hull out of the water.
nice. I think back to @basciliscus taking pains to explain that where the analogies break down, is where it all gets interesting - and perhaps even counter-intuitive. Doubtlessly, you can explain this better than myself. after all, I'm no engineer, I only have a degree in it...the mathematics that describe wings that product downforce and foils that produce lift have more than a little in common.. The subject of my 1st degree's dissertation, as it happens.
And engineers have a very wide opinion of what they are capable of... :lol:Got it, you have a pretty narrow opinion of what engineers are capable of.
I'm no mathematician, I only have a degree in it.I'm no engineer, I only have a degree in it.
How so? Given cavitation is about pressure.Which reminds to ask (to save me reading through every line of the class rule again), does anyone know whether they have removed the prohibition on exotic surface finishes? Because a hydro-phobic surface could/would decrease cavitation substantially
I'm an engineer, and I have a wide range of opinion on what other engineers are capable of too.And engineers have a very wide opinion of what they are capable of... :lol:
Because the bubbles need a surface for nucleation (in coarse terms seeding). That can come from impurities in the water or air bubbles, but a surface causes lots more. Hydrophobic surfaces reduce that effectHow so? Given cavitation is about pressure.
I guess the opposite really. And I think many reached this conclusion ahead of me: that the big add of an F1 team isn't going to be hydro IQ - obviously - but instead software and/or system design. For example, we all know which team had the most success in terms of foil design. They pretty much horizon'ed everybody else. No help from F1 needed.Got it, you have a pretty narrow opinion of what engineers are capable of.
fifAP.the idea is to line up in 2022 on these two circuits to continue to build and strengthen the team, because we must double or even triple it in terms of the number ofsailorscyclors.
The mast breakage on NZL-82 resulted from an aluminum tip cup failure at a spreader end, as I recall.It was the suspension of the hydraulics unit that went wrong in case you didn't notice.
This one was worst:
View attachment 480023
I think he's talking about the hole in the bottom of AM where the taniwha escaped.The mast breakage on NZL-82 resulted from an aluminum tip cup failure at a spreader end, as I recall.
Didnt know this no simulation story... I dont really understand why, it would be so better for the progress of foil science!No, forbidden
The last time I checked, the one-eyed taniwha that lived in the swamp and threatened to block the highway expansion was still in his lair.I think he's talking about the hole in the bottom of AM where the taniwha escaped.
On the North Auckland, Highway 1 Project, or Wellington's Transmission Gully, for example.The last time I checked, the one-eyed taniwha that lived in the swamp and threatened to block the highway expansion was still in his lair.
Of course, there are others...
the "Millennium rigs" were statically indeterminate structures, meaning that at any given time there were multiple load path options would have made it very hard to specify things like tip cups without over-engineering.The mast breakage on NZL-82 resulted from an aluminum tip cup failure at a spreader end, as I recall.