and another mass shooting

[warbird]

View attachment 582340

Re-label that, Countries with Schools

 

[veni vidi vici]

We simply need to eliminate testosterone. Violence problems solved.

Lol …. The shooter was in that process

 

[Mike G]

 

[Voyageur]

Someone is starting to widen in the middle... I suppose that happens to all grandmothers.

poor, pregnant and under educated is the right wing plan.

 

[MagentaLine]

 

[Voyageur]

Someone is starting to widen in the middle... I suppose that happens to all grandmothers.

 

[MagentaLine]

 

[warbird]

Why are these people so invested with guns? That's what I can't understand. What part of the American psyche needs a gun?

The part of America that has no border control and rampant drugs and thugs enter in, that liberal Urban areas coddle criminals rather than locking them up.

 

[Marty Gingras]

Someone is starting to widen in the middle... I suppose that happens to all grandmothers.

Tactical belly armor.

 

[Raz'r]

The part of America that has no border control and rampant drugs and thugs enter in, that liberal Urban areas coddle criminals rather than locking them up.

No, it's all the scaredy cat pussies who think a swarthy young man is going to diddle their wimin. NRA members are the biggest pussies of all.

 

[veni vidi vici]

Should we ban transgender people from buying weapons of war because of this incident of deadly expression of opinion?

There are no weapons of war available to the public in the United States without approval of the ATF
and those are only a few caliber fully automatic handheld weapons.. hardly weapons of war

 

[Sol Rosenberg]

Someone is starting to widen in the middle... I suppose that happens to all grandmothers.

Goes with the trailertory.

 

[warbird]

Exhibit A:

Your ordinary average garden-variety fire extinguisher.

Now, let me ask you a question:

How many times have you actually used a fire extinguisher as it’s intended to be used?

Which is to say, you pulled the pin, pointed it at the base of a fire, swept it back and forth, and put the fire out?

I never have.

I’m guessing most of the people reading this never have, either.

Fires, thankfully, are pretty rare occurrences.

But they do happen sometimes.

Because of the risk of a fire, you see fire extinguishers everywhere.

They’re mandatory, in fact.

If a fire breaks out, and the fire department is minutes away, a fire extinguisher (and someone who knows how to use it) is your best bet.

Most fire extinguishers, thankfully, will never, ever be used. They’ll just sit there in their little holsters on the wall, quietly whiling their time away until they expire and are replaced.

But we keep ’em around just in case there’s ever a fire.

That’s the “point” of fire extinguishers. And I don’t hear anyone questioning it.

So I’m really not sure why people are questioning the “point” of the Second Amendment, even though it’s never been used as intended.

The Second Amendment is tyranny insurance, just like fire extinguishers are fire insurance.

Fires are rare, and so is tyranny—but not that rare.

As Ronald Reagan so sagaciously said, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.”

Should a tyrannical government ever arise on American soil, or a foreign army invade the United States and the US military is stretched thin or annihilated or otherwise hampered in its response to the threat, the Second Amendment exists so that the people of the United States will be armed and ready to defend themselves and their liberty.

Has that ever happened?

Thankfully, no.

But the Second Amendment exists just in case it does. And responsible Americans keep their shooting skills sharp and their guns in good condition and accessible, should the eventuality ever arise.

Just like they keep fire extinguishers in good condition and accessible in case there’s a fire.

Nobody questions the need for fire extinguishers.

Why do they question the need for guns?

 

[Raz'r]

Exhibit A:

Your ordinary average garden-variety fire extinguisher.

Now, let me ask you a question:

How many times have you actually used a fire extinguisher as it’s intended to be used?

Which is to say, you pulled the pin, pointed it at the base of a fire, swept it back and forth, and put the fire out?

I never have.

I’m guessing most of the people reading this never have, either.

Fires, thankfully, are pretty rare occurrences.

But they do happen sometimes.

Because of the risk of a fire, you see fire extinguishers everywhere.

They’re mandatory, in fact.

If a fire breaks out, and the fire department is minutes away, a fire extinguisher (and someone who knows how to use it) is your best bet.

Most fire extinguishers, thankfully, will never, ever be used. They’ll just sit there in their little holsters on the wall, quietly whiling their time away until they expire and are replaced.

But we keep ’em around just in case there’s ever a fire.

That’s the “point” of fire extinguishers. And I don’t hear anyone questioning it.

So I’m really not sure why people are questioning the “point” of the Second Amendment, even though it’s never been used as intended.

The Second Amendment is tyranny insurance, just like fire extinguishers are fire insurance.

Fires are rare, and so is tyranny—but not that rare.

As Ronald Reagan so sagaciously said, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.”

Should a tyrannical government ever arise on American soil, or a foreign army invade the United States and the US military is stretched thin or annihilated or otherwise hampered in its response to the threat, the Second Amendment exists so that the people of the United States will be armed and ready to defend themselves and their liberty.

Has that ever happened?

Thankfully, no.

But the Second Amendment exists just in case it does. And responsible Americans keep their shooting skills sharp and their guns in good condition and accessible, should the eventuality ever arise.

Just like they keep fire extinguishers in good condition and accessible in case there’s a fire.

Nobody questions the need for fire extinguishers.

Why do they question the need for guns?

Great, then I'm sure you'll sign up to be part of the "Well regulated militia"

Thank you for your service.

 

[veni vidi vici]

Exhibit A:

Your ordinary average garden-variety fire extinguisher.

Now, let me ask you a question:

How many times have you actually used a fire extinguisher as it’s intended to be used?

Which is to say, you pulled the pin, pointed it at the base of a fire, swept it back and forth, and put the fire out?

I never have.

I’m guessing most of the people reading this never have, either.

Fires, thankfully, are pretty rare occurrences.

But they do happen sometimes.

Because of the risk of a fire, you see fire extinguishers everywhere.

They’re mandatory, in fact.

If a fire breaks out, and the fire department is minutes away, a fire extinguisher (and someone who knows how to use it) is your best bet.

Most fire extinguishers, thankfully, will never, ever be used. They’ll just sit there in their little holsters on the wall, quietly whiling their time away until they expire and are replaced.

But we keep ’em around just in case there’s ever a fire.

That’s the “point” of fire extinguishers. And I don’t hear anyone questioning it.

So I’m really not sure why people are questioning the “point” of the Second Amendment, even though it’s never been used as intended.

The Second Amendment is tyranny insurance, just like fire extinguishers are fire insurance.

Fires are rare, and so is tyranny—but not that rare.

As Ronald Reagan so sagaciously said, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.”

Should a tyrannical government ever arise on American soil, or a foreign army invade the United States and the US military is stretched thin or annihilated or otherwise hampered in its response to the threat, the Second Amendment exists so that the people of the United States will be armed and ready to defend themselves and their liberty.

Has that ever happened?

Thankfully, no.

But the Second Amendment exists just in case it does. And responsible Americans keep their shooting skills sharp and their guns in good condition and accessible, should the eventuality ever arise.

Just like they keep fire extinguishers in good condition and accessible in case there’s a fire.

Nobody questions the need for fire extinguishers.

Why do they question the need for guns?

Excellent
The 2A is the same thing for an overreaching government

 

[The Main Man]

^ You are a fucking imbecile. Are fire extinguishers primary purpose to kill things? No.

I just cannot understand how you lot can be so gripped with carrying guns you are quite happy to see child after child die. We may not be perfect over here but at least our government acted after one, yes just one horrific incident like this.

 

[warbird]

Great, then I'm sure you'll sign up to be part of the "Well regulated militia"

Thank you for your service.

Everybody is the "militia" in 1776.

 

[warbird]

^ You are a fucking imbecile. Are fire extinguishers primary purpose to kill things? No.

I just cannot understand how you lot can be so gripped with carrying guns you are quite happy to see child after child die. We may not be perfect over here but at least our government acted after one, yes just one horrific incident like this.

Most of don't carry. But, don't break into my house uninvited. MY son, a lineman, was caught in crossfire in a bad section of town with his linecrew doing an electric installation. Fortunately he got his crew to a safe spot and didn't need to use his firearm.

 

[Mike G]

Exhibit A:

Your ordinary average garden-variety fire extinguisher.

Now, let me ask you a question:

How many times have you actually used a fire extinguisher as it’s intended to be used?

Which is to say, you pulled the pin, pointed it at the base of a fire, swept it back and forth, and put the fire out?

I never have.

I’m guessing most of the people reading this never have, either.

Fires, thankfully, are pretty rare occurrences.

But they do happen sometimes.

Because of the risk of a fire, you see fire extinguishers everywhere.

They’re mandatory, in fact.

If a fire breaks out, and the fire department is minutes away, a fire extinguisher (and someone who knows how to use it) is your best bet.

Most fire extinguishers, thankfully, will never, ever be used. They’ll just sit there in their little holsters on the wall, quietly whiling their time away until they expire and are replaced.

But we keep ’em around just in case there’s ever a fire.

That’s the “point” of fire extinguishers. And I don’t hear anyone questioning it.

So I’m really not sure why people are questioning the “point” of the Second Amendment, even though it’s never been used as intended.

The Second Amendment is tyranny insurance, just like fire extinguishers are fire insurance.

Fires are rare, and so is tyranny—but not that rare.

As Ronald Reagan so sagaciously said, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.”

Should a tyrannical government ever arise on American soil, or a foreign army invade the United States and the US military is stretched thin or annihilated or otherwise hampered in its response to the threat, the Second Amendment exists so that the people of the United States will be armed and ready to defend themselves and their liberty.

Has that ever happened?

Thankfully, no.

But the Second Amendment exists just in case it does. And responsible Americans keep their shooting skills sharp and their guns in good condition and accessible, should the eventuality ever arise.

Just like they keep fire extinguishers in good condition and accessible in case there’s a fire.

Nobody questions the need for fire extinguishers.

Why do they question the need for guns?

Dude! You NAILED it! TOTALLY the same.
Genius.
Amazing cut/paste that will surely shut up the 'gun grabberz' and make
them re-think their ways!!1!
All of those kids that die because a lunatic 'fire-extinguished' them are an
inconvenience, sure. But they didn't die in vain.
You'll have to pry my 10BC out of my cold dead hands!!

 

[veni vidi vici]

^ You are a fucking imbecile. Are fire extinguishers primary purpose to kill things? No.

I just cannot understand how you lot can be so gripped with carrying guns you are quite happy to see child after child die. We may not be perfect over here but at least our government acted after one, yes just one horrific incident like this.

Misconstrued gibberish