Agreed.Sponsorship is about improving the public image of your brand.
If Clarisse had qualified and competed, the benefit to BP's brand would be the image of a woman taking on a remarkable challenge.
"If you are a remarkable woman, the right bank for you is Banque Populaire."
Clarisse will likely qualify, but there is a risk that she may not.
Which PR moron weighed up these scenarios:
Option #1 : Support C's endeavor to try and qualify. If she fails you are left with the diminished message:
"If you are a woman who faces the challenge of balancing career and family, let Banque Popular support you and help you with your banking needs"
Option # 2 : Bail on Clarisse. Hire another skipper, enter the race and acheive a mediocre result, leaving the unmistakable message
"If you are a woman.....don't bank with Banque Populaire"
One thing I've learned from paying close attention to sport sponsorships over the years is to never assume I know what a company is looking to get out of it, because I'm usually wrong. French sponsorships are an interesting mix of backroom dealmaking, passionate businesspeople, nepotism, heritage/history and a few really rich fuckers who not only want to win, but want to go and party with the winning team at the finish.Sponsorship is about improving the public image of your brand.
If Clarisse had qualified and competed, the benefit to BP's brand would be the image of a woman taking on a remarkable challenge.
"If you are a remarkable woman, the right bank for you is Banque Populaire."
Clarisse will likely qualify, but there is a risk that she may not.
Which PR moron weighed up these scenarios:
Option #1 : Support C's endeavor to try and qualify. If she fails you are left with the diminished message:
"If you are a woman who faces the challenge of balancing career and family, let Banque Popular support you and help you with your banking needs"
Option # 2 : Bail on Clarisse. Hire another skipper, enter the race and acheive a mediocre result, leaving the unmistakable message
"If you are a woman.....don't bank with Banque Populaire"
Seems that the fiasco just starting...From what I hear, two skippers have already turned the position to take over the boat and sponsorship down because of the backlash.
top team sponsors typically own the boat and have control of the program in france. Smaller teams are generally independent where the skipper or a syndicate own the assets.Obviously, bloody stupid decision by BP.
I’m interested though in the degree of “ownership” for want of a better word the sponsor in this case seems to have over the race programme.
Is this normal for French sponsored sailors - the sponsor calls the shots, even to the point, as now, that they can fire & replace the skipper?
My understanding of the typical commercial model is that the skipper “owns” the race programme - obviously they are totally dependent on their main sponsor to pay the bills, and of course there will be commitments they agree to as part of the deal. But ultimately the sponsor is there to fund the programme and benefit from the exposure - not to make decisions about personnel & the sailing.
Seems very different with BP though?
There is around two decades ago, in french sailing, emerged other links between skipper/sponsorship/ownership. Some in which the skipper is merely an employee.Obviously, bloody stupid decision by BP.
I’m interested though in the degree of “ownership” for want of a better word the sponsor in this case seems to have over the race programme.
Is this normal for French sponsored sailors - the sponsor calls the shots, even to the point, as now, that they can fire & replace the skipper?
My understanding of the typical commercial model is that the skipper “owns” the race programme - obviously they are totally dependent on their main sponsor to pay the bills, and of course there will be commitments they agree to as part of the deal. But ultimately the sponsor is there to fund the programme and benefit from the exposure - not to make decisions about personnel & the sailing.
Seems very different with BP though?
Terrible way for the team to treat their skipper, especially given that it did not make an issue of the matter when informed in Feb 2021.
Of course it's a complete PR disaster for BP too. The negative coverage, which is already national, is going to dwarf years of positive coverage from successful campaigns, not least Crémer's own in the 2020 Vendée. Talk about turning wine into water.
Who cares? Everyone. Except for you apparently.Not at all, Cremer is a spoiled brat basically, Sainte Geneviève, HEC, ok second in a mini transat, then straight to IMOCA, and now whining, who cares ?
more thoughts,...
1. maybe BP are concerned about being accused of tearing a new/young mother away from it's mother when it needs her most ?
2. what if she is replaced by another female ?
If I were looking for a female replacement, my first choice would be Justine.
second choice would be Isabelle, or maybe there is another new high flyer out there ?
I think (?) Justine already has a boat - but they are not a high profile team like BP
She could have gone to Hogwarts, still nobody would care.Cremer is a spoiled brat basically, Sainte Geneviève, HEC
Ah would you stop…Not at all, Cremer is a spoiled brat basically, Sainte Geneviève, HEC, ok second in a mini transat, then straight to IMOCA, and now whining, who cares ?
Banque Populaire sponsorship will be complicated even by French standards.One thing I've learned from paying close attention to sport sponsorships over the years is to never assume I know what a company is looking to get out of it, because I'm usually wrong. French sponsorships are an interesting mix of backroom dealmaking, passionate businesspeople, nepotism, heritage/history
Trust me even people who deal with Banque Populaire are uncertain who calls the shotsAlso, I think BP Group changed CEOs last year, but I'm not 100% sure.