Biden Gun Control

[Mike in Seattle]

,,, so a civilian AR can't cut a body in half ,,,

@tybee
? you're smarter than the President AND a Marine Colonel ?

I know those .223 rounds are really really fast.
!! THREE THOUSAND feet per second !!

?? can a civilian AR decapitate an adult ??

, be carefull,,
? are you sure you want to contradict the President and NPR ?


@Bagheera ? what's the deal here ?

 

[tybee]

@tybee
? you're smarter than the President AND a Marine Colonel ?

ah, what?

well, i'll admit to being brighter than the last marine colonel i had to explain an IT issue to but dunno about the bidenator.

 

[Mike in Seattle]

ah, what?

ah, another non-reader.

?? can a civilian AR decapitate an adult ??

a Marine Colonel says a single round can cut a person in half

 

[veni vidi vici]

If a Marine Colonel says a single round can cut a person in half,

? who am _I_ to dispute his word ?


If the President says it can decapitate an adult,
, and NPR tells us the same,


? who am _I_ to dispute their word ?

, since I don't own anything that uses the .223 round,
, there's no base of experience for me.


? team Grabbers,, what's the deal ?

Deflection and comparing apples to oranges

 

[veni vidi vici]

The party line seems to be that BS is OK if it's in service of the holy crusade to buyback guns without compensation.

From the thread where that BS first appeared:



This is not surprising, considering the tolerance for ideas like indoor militias, the Bill of Rights applying only to 18th century tech,[
/b] and Trump's usurpation of power. What's a little more BS on the pile? Gungrabbiness Uber Alles!

Care to back up the highlighted quote

 

[tybee]

ah, another non-reader.

well, mikey me lad, show me where i stated anything about an AR round cutting someone in half.

 

[Pertinacious Tom]

Care to back up the highlighted quote

You highlighted two claims.

The first is that the Bill of Rights only applies to technology in existence at the time it was ratified. A claim made to the US Supreme Court on behalf of the State of Massachusetts.

It was argument 1A, their main claim. I helpfully circled it to try to get dishonest grabbers to notice it.

The second claim was that Trump usurped power and grabbers didn't care a bit. There's a whole thread about it. You can skip to this post to see the current status.

 

[veni vidi vici]

You highlighted two claims.

The first is that the Bill of Rights only applies to technology in existence at the time it was ratified. A claim made to the US Supreme Court on behalf of the State of Massachusetts.

It was argument 1A, their main claim. I helpfully circled it to try to get dishonest grabbers to notice it.

The second claim was that Trump usurped power and grabbers didn't care a bit. There's a whole thread about it. You can skip to this post to see the current status.

A stun gun is not a gun
anymore than a AR15 or any variant is an “assault rifle “ which is a made up liboid term.
Assault drill
Please help me here , when did DJT usurp power ?

 

[Keith]

 

[Keith]

 

[badlatitude]

Kids are expendable, so that the 2nd Amendment will stay safe.

 

[Pertinacious Tom]

Please help me here , when did DJT usurp power ?

I told you at the end of the post you quoted and in the relevant thread.

Maybe you'll believe it coming from Justice Gorsuch?

The agency used to tell everyone that
bump stocks don’t qualify as “machineguns.” Now it says
the opposite. The law hasn’t changed, only an agency’s in-
terpretation of it. And these days it sometimes seems agen-
cies change their statutory interpretations almost as often
as elections change administrations. How, in all this, can
ordinary citizens be expected to keep up—required not only
to conform their conduct to the fairest reading of the law
they might expect from a neutral judge, but forced to guess
whether the statute will be declared ambiguous; to guess
again whether the agency’s initial interpretation of the law
will be declared “reasonable”; and to guess again whether a
later and opposing agency interpretation will also be held
“reasonable”? And why should courts, charged with the in-
dependent and neutral interpretation of the laws Congress
has enacted, defer to such bureaucratic pirouetting?

The rule of law and guessing what might set off a Trumper Tantrum next are mutually exclusive.

 

[veni vidi vici]

I told you at the end of the post you quoted and in the relevant thread.

Maybe you'll believe it coming from Justice Gorsuch?



The rule of law and guessing what might set off a Trumper Tantrum next are mutually exclusive.

Scatterbrained writing

 

[Pertinacious Tom]

Scatterbrained writing

So you're saying Trump was wrong to appoint him?

 

[Pertinacious Tom]

Assault drill

That's not a machine gun though.

This is. I mean, if you print it on metal and not paper, obviously. Images printed on paper can't be machine guns, but these images printed on metal can be a machine gun.

 

[Keith]

 

[Keith]

 

[veni vidi vici]

Don’t worry about it

 

[Mike in Seattle]

@d'ranger

If a Marine Colonel says a single round can cut a person in half,

? who am _I_ to dispute his word ?


If the President says it can decapitate an adult,
, and NPR tells us the same,


? who am _I_ to dispute their word ?

, since I don't own anything that uses the .223 round,
, there's no base of experience for me.


? team Grabbers,, what's the deal ?

You have been around long enough to know that I am usually somewhat Disrespectful of the .223.

"Poodleshooter" ,
, useful for teaching little girls how to shoot
and
Ok hunting round for game up to the size of, umm, poodles,

With that said, I know the 223 is popular among the Varmint hunters, for being able to make hits at distances FAR beyond what I myself would shoot a heavier caliber at Bambi.

, but NOW, the President tells us 223 will decapitate an adult,
, and a Marine officer tells us it will cut a man in half .

D'ranger, ?? have I been THAT wrong for all these years ??

, ?? will it really decapitate an adult, or cut them in half ??


I might actually NEED an AR.

Some of the "coyotes" out west outweigh me by fifty percent.


? what's the deal here, ?

 

[Keith]

Its Monday must be another shooting...

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...-police-confirm-multiple-casualties-rcna78933