DA-WOODY
Super Anarchist
Last edited by a moderator:
... I could care less what happens to my rating.Scooter, I had a Santa Cruz 27 for a decade -- from 1975 (new from the factory) until I moved to Europe in 1985. Since my brother is a sail maker, I had every sail anyone could imagine, including bloopers. The first few years, most other SC27s also had bloopers, and we often had several well sailed SC27s in any given race.
After about a year or two of Wet Wednesdays and other high-frequency events, it was very, very clear that bloopers were slower. Whichever boats used bloopers were down positions or at least distance by the leeward mark, no matter which boats used or did not use bloopers. And we all sometimes used them, and sometimes did not. All these boats had good sail programs and good sailors. All the boats were new. Racing was very tight.
SC27 and SC33 have essentially identical hull forms, SA/D, SA/WS, D/L ratios, so I would be astonished if this lesson did not apply to your SC33.
So I would CERTAINLY fly a blooper, just because its fun and keeps the entire crew involved, and is appropriate for the era the boat was built. Like playing tunes by the Beach Boys in a '63 Corvette convertible, or Highway Star in a '71 Plymouth Cuda Hemi with a 4 speed.
But I no longer care about winning trophies: I threw away a dumpster full of them in 1985. If you want trophies (nothing wrong with that!!) then don't fly the blooper.
I'm turbo-ing the shit out of my Olson 40! I could not care less what happens to my rating.
Using a blooper in Wed night RTB racing, or any RTB racing would have been a complete waste of time - especially since in the 70s and 80s all RTB was triangles, so one downwind leg out 6. There was a decent local fleet of IOR 1T and 2T at the time, and I don't recall any of them flying bloopers in RTB races.Scooter, I had a Santa Cruz 27 for a decade -- from 1975 (new from the factory) until I moved to Europe in 1985. Since my brother is a sail maker, I had every sail anyone could imagine, including bloopers. The first few years, most other SC27s also had bloopers, and we often had several well sailed SC27s in any given race.
After about a year or two of Wet Wednesdays and other high-frequency events, it was very, very clear that bloopers were slower. Whichever boats used bloopers were down positions or at least distance by the leeward mark, no matter which boats used or did not use bloopers. And we all sometimes used them, and sometimes did not. All these boats had good sail programs and good sailors. All the boats were new. Racing was very tight.
SC27 and SC33 have essentially identical hull forms, SA/D, SA/WS, D/L ratios, so I would be astonished if this lesson did not apply to your SC33.
So I would CERTAINLY fly a blooper, just because its fun and keeps the entire crew involved, and is appropriate for the era the boat was built. Like playing tunes by the Beach Boys in a '63 Corvette convertible, or Highway Star in a '71 Plymouth Cuda Hemi with a 4 speed.
But I no longer care about winning trophies: I threw away a dumpster full of them in 1985. If you want trophies (nothing wrong with that!!) then don't fly the blooper.
I'm turbo-ing the shit out of my Olson 40! I could not care less what happens to my rating.
ain't that the truth! i was kidding about getting a new one. i'm fuckin nuts, but even i have my limits.What's the old saying?....."Put it up and gain half a knot; take it down and gain half a knot." Ours only comes out of the bag every few years, and you need good crew who knows how to trim it, but when it works, it works great. It's a great sail to buy used from Bacon's or one of the other resale lofts. No need to put good dollars towards a new one.
View attachment 246893
Plus, they don't make the proper Blooper colors anymore. None of the required green, black, orange, pink combinations. Sad.ain't that the truth! i was kidding about getting a new one. i'm fuckin nuts, but even i have my limits.
A Cuben Fiber Blooper?SailBlueH2O said:Iv'e been thinking today....perhaps the notion could be revisited in 2017 with today's materials and different shape
And that might work! No. wait! you might have to shorten your E to IOR type numbers.SailBlueH2O said:Iv'e been thinking today....perhaps the notion could be revisited in 2017 with today's materials and different shape
And yet further irony about IOR boats - a rolling boat was a fast boat. We used one on the halfy Silver Shamrock a fair bit. It was the first one built for a frac rig in Aus at the time.The thing that was counter intuitive about bloopers is when it was really windy (20+), the blooper helped stabilize the boat from doing death rolls due to the small mains and big mast head spinnakers.
Fly the friggin' blooper ! Back in the olden days I flew this beast off the halyard standing on the foredeck. Surrounded by all that sail and the sound of the bow wake echoing off the sails was just a great experience. Do it !!! That was with Timmy Woodhouse BTW.![]()
Or is it? Here's a question that at first has the obvious answer of "NO", and that is once we start sailing the Santa Cruz 33 Anarchy III (first race is the CRA Halloween Regatta October 28), do you think we should fly the blooper that came with the boat?
Pictured here is the Santa Cruz 33 Freight Train sailed by Gary Swenson in the (we think) 1977 Santa Barbara to King Harbor race. It is obviously working in the pic, but would it today? If it does, we'll have a new one built!
Jump in and let the insults fly!
Agree completely. The end of the boom and the end of the pole should spend equal time pointing at the sun.SailBlueH2O said:In my experience...the key to a white knuckle IOR offshore rolly polly was not to try and counter the coming round up by fighting the boat by horsing the helm down...but to steer the course and endure the rail to rail~~~worked best for me