Recidivist
Super Anarchist
From the front page:
1. @Anarchist David serves up a puff piece about the 2022 Sydney - Hobart race, including reference to "dockside gossip" that is intended to show how close David is to the action. But he might be advised to check the entrants lists for the CYCA Blue Water Pointscore series that may cast a different light on his "close to the source" writings. As many people here know, one well known player is unlikely to be fronting the start line on December 26, having ostensibly departed the sport.
2. @Brian Hancock writes another breathless article, ostensibly about the Route de Rhum but actually more about himself. Hang on - isn't this the same bloke who was the subject of a thread a year or so ago where it was alleged he was, through his business, taking deposits for sails that were ultimately never delivered? I may have missed the thread that advised that this was all sorted satisfactorily - maybe @Editor or @MrClean could point me to it?
3. Now, @Anarchist David writes another article for the front page about the Nexba situation, demonstrating that he has (or certainly appears to have) no idea what is actually happening on that front and the factors that are holding up the public release of information. Rather than trying to big note himself by beating up a sensitive matter, perhaps David could show some respect to those affected by allowing it to be sorted by the affected persons as they think appropriate. Other parties who may be interested in the outcome are, as always, free to place or withhold their orders as they see fit.
Come on SA, this is embarrassing!
Apologies for stuffing up the @'s - I'm not Facebook or twitter compatible and clearly don't know the correct procedure.
1. @Anarchist David serves up a puff piece about the 2022 Sydney - Hobart race, including reference to "dockside gossip" that is intended to show how close David is to the action. But he might be advised to check the entrants lists for the CYCA Blue Water Pointscore series that may cast a different light on his "close to the source" writings. As many people here know, one well known player is unlikely to be fronting the start line on December 26, having ostensibly departed the sport.
2. @Brian Hancock writes another breathless article, ostensibly about the Route de Rhum but actually more about himself. Hang on - isn't this the same bloke who was the subject of a thread a year or so ago where it was alleged he was, through his business, taking deposits for sails that were ultimately never delivered? I may have missed the thread that advised that this was all sorted satisfactorily - maybe @Editor or @MrClean could point me to it?
3. Now, @Anarchist David writes another article for the front page about the Nexba situation, demonstrating that he has (or certainly appears to have) no idea what is actually happening on that front and the factors that are holding up the public release of information. Rather than trying to big note himself by beating up a sensitive matter, perhaps David could show some respect to those affected by allowing it to be sorted by the affected persons as they think appropriate. Other parties who may be interested in the outcome are, as always, free to place or withhold their orders as they see fit.
Come on SA, this is embarrassing!
Apologies for stuffing up the @'s - I'm not Facebook or twitter compatible and clearly don't know the correct procedure.
