Pertinacious Tom
Importunate Member
Is "having" something possessing it or selling it in your world?Then why can't we (or you) have lawn darts?
Is "having" something possessing it or selling it in your world?Then why can't we (or you) have lawn darts?
Actually you are wrong yet again. Where did I say they were illegal to possess? I said sale was banned. Not the same thing. Isn't this fun?
You said "banned." Not the same thing. Isn't this fun?Imagine if guns were as dangerous as, like, lawn darts. They'd be banned.
We have whack jobs too. 20 years old and full of hate. I wonder where he learned to hate Muslims.And a guy kills a whole family with his automobile over religion. My bad, a 9 yo still in a coma.
What's up Canada?
Ah, I mis-typed, should have said "Why can't we buy lawn darts".Is "having" something possessing it or selling it in your world?
Twice, in two different threads. Once might have been a typo. Twice is a pattern.Ah, I mis-typed
And yet, Canada's suicide rate is about the same as ours. Are Canadian battlefield .22 owners causing this?I am reading the book 'Skin in the Game' by Nassim Nicholas Taleb. In that book, he postulates that 10,000 Americans die every year by suicide simply because guns are available and handy.
Hi Tom,And yet, Canada's suicide rate is about the same as ours. Are Canadian battlefield .22 owners causing this?
If you want to relate to Tom, within limited dimensions, go for it. Make the boundaries clear. These points of discussion could remain off limits:Hi Tom,
I think you come across as a good guy. You like boats, you seem like a good neighbour and you seem like the kind of guy I could sail with or have a beer with.
From what I have read, Canada's gun suicide rate is not about the same as yours (meaning the USA). I reference a book I am reading with that had an interesting note. I quoted and referenced that.
I just Googled "compare suicide rates canada vs usa"
Here is what I found right away:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232252
A published, peer reviewed article that supports the numbers quoted by Taleb. Here is a quote:
Relative to Canada, the male suicide fatality rate in the US standardized population was greater in every age group. The proportion of male suicide fatalities due to firearms in the US standardized population ranged from 46% among those aged 25 to 34 to 78% among those aged 65 or older. In contrast, the proportion of male suicide fatalities due to firearms in Canada ranged from six percent among those under the age of 15 years to 32% among those aged 65 or older. We estimated that if males in the US had the same firearm suicide fatality rate as Canada, we would observe 76.9% fewer suicide fatalities due to firearms and 32.8% more non-firearm suicide fatalities. The overall male suicide fatality rate would be 28.8% lower if males in the US had the same firearm suicide fatality rate as Canada, and would be equivalent to approximately 9,992 fewer suicide fatalities each year.
I am not going to engage in debate about this. It really doesn't interest me very much. I just thought this interesting. If you want to quibble, please take up your arguments with Taleb or the author of the paper above.
I plan to retire soon and want to take some road trips. Meeting you, chatting and having a beer would be great (I will buy the beer). If you invited me sailing, I would go as I have seen pictures of your SunCat and it looks like a hoot. Let's just not talk about guns or politics.
Cheers.
Mass Shooting Near Toronto
And your country is going to wait most of another year before beginning to confiscate battlefield .22's and other such weapons of mass destruction?
Just because you did not notice a mass shooting does not mean it didn't happen. It might just mean you don't have a billionaire in the business of scaring people.Canada 2021 - 5 dead & wounded in mass killing.
Speaking of that, when are you going to explain that a DGU for you is acceptable, but not for anyone else?But look beneath the surface with this man, and help him where you can. He will be in good company.
first rot it hell, my friend, and do it soonSpeaking of that, when are you going to explain that a DGU for you is acceptable, but not for anyone else?
Maybe after that we can work on having you admit that the American Revolution happened.
I realize it is hard, Joe, when you can't just cut-n-paste an answer - but give it a try.first rot it hell, my friend, and do it soon
You missed the shopping list in this thread?Not true of Canadian firearms law, there's nothing there specific about rifle cartridges. It's just that only .22 can have a high capacity magazine, and that predates the "assault rifle" controversy. The same thing would apply to a battle rifle.Not to people who write laws in Australia, Canada, or the US Congress.
Well, OK, but "high capacity" means 5 rounds, or sometimes 10, or, with the correct label, 15 rounds in Canada. By any of those definitions, lots of guns other than battlefield .22's can have a high capacity magazine.Yes, as a card carrying conservative-I am generally happy with the status quo Canadian gun laws.
Yes, which is why so many battlefield .22's were on the shopping list Trudeau created for me.
It's a reasonable question. In Canada, if people are too ignorant to know that firearm is one word, are they allowed to own guns or lecture others about them?Why give easy fire arm access to so many ignorant and under educated people.