Perhaps, but that's a different argument,and one I don't agree with.People still get fired for inappropriate jokes.
Imagine cops joking about using tanks to clear a BLM protest
Perhaps, but that's a different argument,and one I don't agree with.People still get fired for inappropriate jokes.
Imagine cops joking about using tanks to clear a BLM protest
I see. I haven't found that in my googling yet but I don't doubt you. However:The fact is; not tanks, but military engineers were posited as the solution to moving the truckers after the actual tow truck operators demurred.
The fact is; not tanks, but military engineers were posited as the solution to moving the truckers after the actual tow truck operators demurred. I shouldn't really say truckers here, because apparently the trucks tended to be farm trucks that would be usually idle that time of year.
At the time I couldn't understand why those assholes were allowed to leave and return with food and diesel.The Emergencies Act being invoked, did not effect 99.99999 percent of Canadians.
If the local police had stepped up early and took action, it would have never been required.
So, a complete failure of the responsibility of the local police to take charge and act, allowed the protestors to get out of control.
Nothing more, nothing less.
Exactly.They were too afraid of retribution to hook them up - their trucks have names & contact info all over them and the shitbag convoy people are dangerous cowards.
I would like to believe they thought they were doing the right thing, whether we disagree or not. I've seen no evidence they were shit bags. Admittedly my only information came from what I saw on tvThey were too afraid of retribution to hook them up - their trucks have names & contact info all over them and the shitbag convoy people are dangerous cowards.
No, the the tow truck company's weren't doing the right thing,I would like to believe they thought they were doing the right thing, whether we disagree or not. I've seen no evidence they were shit bags. Admittedly my only information came from what I saw on tv
how different is this from when it snowed in Toronto and Megga city Mel called in the army? (having been there at the time, that was with out a doubt the right decision.)The thing of it is; the heavy wrecker operators did not have an entire garage full of; "Thunderbirds are Go" heavy wreckers. They have enough heavy wreckers out 24/7, for the usual incidents to make them a profit. The 401 keeps them busy enough in winter. If all the heavy wreckers were busy in Ottawa for a week, Southern Ontario would have been really stuffed up with the usual jackknifes, etc. Thus; the notion of using military engineers and their gear, was not unreasonable at all.
I don't disagree. I am just happy it did not come to that with towing away the trucks in Ottawa.how different is this
how different is this from when it snowed in Toronto and Megga city Mel called in the army? (having been there at the time, that was with out a doubt the right decision.)
They were lowlifes - Trumper wannabees.I would like to believe they thought they were doing the right thing, whether we disagree or not. I've seen no evidence they were shit bags. Admittedly my only information came from what I saw on tv
They might have thought they were doing the right thing but very quickly it became obvious that they were not. Intimidating people wearing masks and responding to requests by residents to stop using air horns by blowing said horns more is not doing the right thing. I have been to enough protests over the years to know what is civil behaviour and what is not. Went to a massive teacher protest in Hamilton decades ago against some Tory anti-teacher legislation (what is old is new again). In the loading dock area of Copps Coliseum there were about 50 cops (OPP) in riot gear (rare to see back then). They didn't move because the demonstration, with a city permit, was peaceful and ended when it was time to end.I would like to believe they thought they were doing the right thing, whether we disagree or not. I've seen no evidence they were shit bags. Admittedly my only information came from what I saw on tv
The superpowers that Smith never advertised or forewarned are the ones really worth unpacking. Because for all the advance debate about what it meant in Smith's head for the province to have sovereign powers, nobody expected that Smith fancied giving herself the powers of a sovereign.
Section 4 of the Alberta Sovereignty within a United Canada Act gives the provincial cabinet the kinglike powers to amend legislation by circumventing the legislature, and all the debates and democratic trappings therein. Once the UCP-dominated legislature approves a resolution that beefs about — say, federal methane regulations for fertilizer — there's nothing in Smith's bill that constrains the secret law-rewriting powers of the premier and her lieutenants.
There's a second extraordinary thing this bill does. It severely limits Albertans' rights to challenge use of the act's superpowers in court.
She's talked about the bill as a "shield" against Ottawa. It also shields her government from its own concerned citizens.