- Thread starter
- #981
That is quite the burn coming from JT.
Although he was a drama teacher, his elecution is terrible.
There are several words that seem to be misspelled in the tweet. "Have you ever heard her speak?" looks more better to me.
That is quite the burn coming from JT.
Although he was a drama teacher, his elecution is terrible.
FIFYThat is quite the burn coming from JT.
Although he was a drama teacher, hiselecutionelocution is terrible.
His elocution is due to a lifelong speech impediment that he has mostly conquered.That is quite the burn coming from JT.
Although he was a drama teacher, his elecution is terrible.
I did not know he had a speech impediment.
That is respectable that he chose politics and to put himself in the firing line with a speech impediment.
William Pitt the YoungerThat would make sense, since he has that messianic method of leadership.
I am drawing a blank on successful familial leaders of government.
And by success, I would not measure that by simply winning elections.
Sounds a lot more appealing than Bush the Elder.
Little Potato does have a nice ring to it though.
“What Danielle Smith is advancing,” said political scientist Emmett Macfarlane of the University of Waterloo, “is an unconstitutional affront to the separation of powers, the principle of parliamentary sovereignty, the powers of the (lieutenant governor), and democracy itself. It cannot stand.”
In other words, Dr. Macfarlane continued bluntly in one of many tweets on the topic after the release of the legislation, it is “perhaps the most blatantly unconstitutional pile of crap ever introduced in a legislature in modern Canadian history.”
She has 6 months - I can't see her winning the election.
Alberta is pretty fucking right wing but they ain't like Floriduh.