Alan H
Super Anarchist
FKT thinks that the whole "religion" thing is a fantasy. He's said that he's not interested in enacting laws that make it illegal to have, or speak about what he considers a stupid fantasy, but gets pissed off when people who believe in this fantasy try to shove religion-based law through government, and force their beliefs on him and others. He's been upfront about his belief that the whole Jesus thing is more or less a delusion. I should be free to have my stupid delusion, if I want it, just don't force my delusion on anybody else.
Which is fine. I totally agree. I can have my religion, he can think it's stupid, it's all good. We agree, no religion has any business running civil government, or forcing through laws, at all.
I have two points.... Two simple points, and one corollary. That's it. That's all that I've had since I got my hackles raised up by yet another poster in PA who wrote "Christian" when what he meant was "Bible slinging RWNJ". I'll lay it out in numerical order one last time for those of you with comprehension issues.
1.) yes, there's terrible stuff that has been done in the name of "Religion", but there is also good stuff. Like all human institutions there's good and bad mixed up.
2.) that just because some Christians do awful stuff; carry AR-15's and march around with red baseball caps on, or worse... abuse kids... does not mean that ALL Christians do those things. In fact tens of millions of Christians and Christian churches in the USA do not do those things. The same goes for any other major religion.
What's the corollary? Well, when someone uses the word "Christian" when what they mean is "right wing fucking nut job with a bible" .... "Or Sodomizing Priest/minister/bishop"...I get a little annoyed, 'cause you know, I'm a Christian and I'm not a RWNJ, and haven't sodomized anybody. Maybe it would be smart to actually use the right words to get your message across.
This is just not that hard to understand. That is crystal clear. It's not unreasonable, it's not difficult. It's just not, and no amount of deflecting, changing the subject, or throwing around of graphs is going to change it.
Which is fine. I totally agree. I can have my religion, he can think it's stupid, it's all good. We agree, no religion has any business running civil government, or forcing through laws, at all.
I have two points.... Two simple points, and one corollary. That's it. That's all that I've had since I got my hackles raised up by yet another poster in PA who wrote "Christian" when what he meant was "Bible slinging RWNJ". I'll lay it out in numerical order one last time for those of you with comprehension issues.
1.) yes, there's terrible stuff that has been done in the name of "Religion", but there is also good stuff. Like all human institutions there's good and bad mixed up.
2.) that just because some Christians do awful stuff; carry AR-15's and march around with red baseball caps on, or worse... abuse kids... does not mean that ALL Christians do those things. In fact tens of millions of Christians and Christian churches in the USA do not do those things. The same goes for any other major religion.
What's the corollary? Well, when someone uses the word "Christian" when what they mean is "right wing fucking nut job with a bible" .... "Or Sodomizing Priest/minister/bishop"...I get a little annoyed, 'cause you know, I'm a Christian and I'm not a RWNJ, and haven't sodomized anybody. Maybe it would be smart to actually use the right words to get your message across.
This is just not that hard to understand. That is crystal clear. It's not unreasonable, it's not difficult. It's just not, and no amount of deflecting, changing the subject, or throwing around of graphs is going to change it.