That's a lot of capital in fancy toys. I hope their production is big enough to support that. There is a reason a lot of builders just farm out CNC plugs...
Yup, those boys would drop in on stuff I would not even watch from the shore. I'll add one more thing. ACC is only capable of building a boat every 2 years currently. Balance is building most probably 5 times that per year. IMHO that's harder to do. I really like the Balance boats. It's a strong well built boat.Surfing legends in SA. Looks like a pretty happy motivated workforce, normally means you end up with good product in the end.
The wrong reason to decline to buy a boat is because it is "difficult" to buy . It is better to buy a good boat from a difficult owner than buy a difficult boat from a helpful owner.OK @Mambo Kings, I agree re the joys of this process (sarcasm). Out searching and maybe have you equaled or topped on being burned by flakes meter.
Yea you are correct for sure in getting right boat from wrong owner vs wrong boat. And ha(!) we all know what we like (well the owners here at least). If you have owned a few big boats and crossed oceans I don't think you can help but have strong opinions about what you like and not in a boat. All that said I don't know if for this purchase - which is very situationally and time specific - I don't know if I have the bandwidth or timeline to deal with a difficult owner and process. Would be different if it was our fovever boat but this is a need it now for this kinda boat. Anyway was just funny how we ended up mirroring your earlier frustration with the process and people.The wrong reason to decline to buy a boat is because it is "difficult" to buy . It is better to buy a good boat from a difficult owner than buy a difficult boat from a helpful owner.
I had moderate success in my working life hiring talented people who were "difficult: to manage. I was always surprised (and pleased) that competitors seemed to shy away from difficult in favor of less talented.
Im looking for a talented boat. The boat will be with me for a decade. The former owner will not. If you and your wife love that boat, (and god knows you know what you like!), then dont give up so easy.
Welcome back, I hope all is well!I;m back at my desk. I see there have been a good number of advice , discussion and rants in my absence.
It is all good stuff.
One of the more interesting discussions was about build quality.
At the top of the quality ladder, there is no doubt that there is a thrill about having a custom build by craftsmen at a shop like ACC. With the right designer, the finished boat will be exceptional. In Penman's case, he was already sailing a multihull and this was a project that he could relish and enjoy the planning and construction time. I would add Rockport Marine to that lost of custom builders that would be thrilling to wok with. Unfortunately, due to PPP, I dont have the luxury of time. I want to "go" soon.
However there is one interesting option that I am looking at. That is the option of taking on a manageable project. Good bones that need a refit. The hull and structure would be production boat quality. But the fixtures, fitting and much of the equipment would be customized by me working with a custom shop. I'm looking at 3-6 months. They say three months but they also say "We may be slow but we're expensive". I could live with that. It involves getting on another plane. I've locked it in sufficiently that it is worth the trip.
One rung above the custom build is the skilled builder who is building their own boat. When @Dogfish built his own cat', the quality standard was build as if your own life depended on it because.......
One rung below the custom builder is probably Balance. I agree that Balance is a notch above Outremer. One reason for that is that skilled craftsmen, laminators and cabinet makers are less expensive in Cape Province than they are in Provence. They both have to end up at the same price point.
So Outremer has to be efficient in hull production (Resin Infusion is more time efficient but not as weight efficient as hand laminators), cost conscious (polyester in places where Balance uses vinylester) and pick their spots where the cabinet finish matters (the visible quality is first class but when you reach behind the fittings, the Balance is lined or sanded, and you will sometimes find rough edges in the Outremer).
But......and this is a very important but......the quality of workmanship, and the stiffness of the hulls and boat in an Outremer is many rungs above the vast majority of production boats, both monohulls and multihulls. Both Balance and Outremer are dedicated to building Blue water performance catamarans.Both are passionately proud of their product and very close to their customers. Both stand behind their product, with a "no questions asked" approach to their warranty. There are several "build managers" and "surveyors" located close to Outremer who work for prospective owners during the build process and Outremer is happy to work with them and gives them complete access throughout the build. The best is a woman who is an international surveyor, lives in town and knows every millimeter of the Outermer build process . Again, I dont have time to build my own boat.
One further difference between Outremer and Balance, is that Balance is owned and managed by the founder who has a clear and forceful vision (and a great business model).....with two builders who are also owner/managers. Outremer is now part of a conglomerate. However on the factory floor, there is no doubting the passion of the workforce is still there. At the margin, I think the ownership of Balance helps the product , and I detect they refine the boat in a faster more responsive manner to sailor/customer feedback...but that is only an impression (no doubt reinforced by Phil's marketing prowess).
I dont have a view on HH although I have walked around the boat carefully. The eye for detail is not as sharp as when you are actually considering buying a boat.
Outremer and Balance are currently the two most successful "production" builders in this space and there is good reason for both of their success.
On the rungs below them are several boats I dont want to comment on for fear of being superficial. Some are great designs with less build quality. Some are terrific build quality without enough blue water experience incorporated in the design. Some are brilliant boats with great design and quality that have not built enough boats to be available on the market, except in rare instances.. Some are Aussie or British limited production runs which look really interesting but I dont know enough about them to contribute. None of them seem to be from the USA......how far down the ladder do I have to descend to find an American boat? Sad in a way.
This makes me scared for you; the point you've made repeatedly is that you don't have time for a new build. I'd argue that reasoning extends to a major refit. What you're describing above is not 3-6 months, it's a year. The only way you knock it out in 6 months is if you hire the workers, they work full time for you, and you're the "GC" of the project. Very hard, and hard to find the talent too.Good bones that need a refit. The hull and structure would be production boat quality. But the fixtures, fitting and much of the equipment would be customized by me working with a custom shop. I'm looking at 3-6 months. They say three months but they also say "We may be slow but we're expensive". I could live with that. It involves getting on another plane. I've locked it in sufficiently that it is worth the trip.
Listen to this man!This makes me scared for you; the point you've made repeatedly is that you don't have time for a new build. I'd argue that reasoning extends to a major refit. What you're describing above is not 3-6 months, it's a year. The only way you knock it out in 6 months is if you hire the workers, they work full time for you, and you're the "GC" of the project. Very hard, and hard to find the talent too.
I guess it's possible you could have functionally the same thing with a contractor who commits in writing to how much labor he'll put on your project, but I've never seen that.
And let's talk money....you're at risk of putting a $1,000 saddle on a $100 pony here. If the result works for you and your cruising program maybe that's OK, but what you can sell the boat for down the road will be based mostly on the $100, not the $1,000.
And another caveat; these kinds of refits have a slippery slope to them where you start fixing stuff the original builders did wrong. This can be a bottomless pit, and why after one experience I promised myself I would never again refit a boat that didn't come from the known small handful of premier builders.
And there will be surprises. They will be to the downside.
Sorry......
Solid, concrete advice based on an owner's actual experience.Solar Panels: Solara PowerM. Walkable, very durable, had them on my previous 57 and they still look brand new after 5 years. Solbian are lighter but definitely not as durable. You have to put high temp foam on the roof to truly protect from no wind days when the panels get hot. IT DOES NOT make the cabin hotter in fact it's been my experience that the heat is absorbed by the aluminum support plate. No better panel out there.
Energy generation should be all solar. No reason for a genset, once again IMHO. One more frigging engine, lines and crap........heavy too.
I wish we could get Pierre of BioTrek to contribute to this thread. In terms of power storage and batteries I really think he is the most knowledgeable owner around. I might ping him.Solid, concrete advice based on an owner's actual experience.
All the joking aside, that is what this thread is really about.
Ive described it badly. Sorry.This makes me scared for you; the point you've made repeatedly is that you don't have time for a new build. I'd argue that reasoning extends to a major refit. What you're describing above is not 3-6 months, it's a year.
I know this is a tough question because everyone's power consumption is unique, but we have our boat spec'd with 3.2 kW of fixed glass panel solar in elevated composite frames with individual controllers for shading, and a battery bank of 600 Ah at 48V (28.8 kWh), so with that hardware how close to running fully off of solar do you feel we could achieve (on a scale from 1-10 with 10 being completely autonomous)Solar Panels: Solara PowerM. Walkable, very durable, had them on my previous 57 and they still look brand new after 5 years. Solbian are lighter but definitely not as durable. You have to put high temp foam on the roof to truly protect from no wind days when the panels get hot. IT DOES NOT make the cabin hotter in fact it's been my experience that the heat is absorbed by the aluminum support plate. No better panel out there.
Energy generation should be all solar. No reason for a genset, once again IMHO. One more frigging engine, lines and crap........heavy too.