Displacement measurements work if you have the hull offsets. Very accurate if done right.i'm curious , how do you weigh a 50' boat with rigging?
Displacement measurements work if you have the hull offsets. Very accurate if done right.i'm curious , how do you weigh a 50' boat with rigging?
Just pretend *********** is on board.200kg seems pretty reasonable to me
Then stick a 2 meter stick off the front to go faster downwind.200kg, 440lb, doesn't seem like much outta 18000lb displacement. Why don't they just add corrector weights to the light boats for one design races? Hell just add 50 gallons in the water tanks.
Those fixed bowsprits are stupid. For almost the same weight, you could just bring the rest of the boat out to the extent of the sprit and have 5 more feet of waterline. Plus eliminate a highly stressed structural connection. But that's fashion for ya.
No it isn't. one part. one mold. One manufacturing process, much less man hours in engineering and assembly.Then stick a 2 meter stick off the front to go faster downwind.
More hull is a lot more expensive than a sprit.
The ClubSwan 80 is a retractable sprit- https://www.nautorswan.com/news/2020/09/clubswan-80-born-to-change-the-maxi-yachts-world/No it isn't. one part. one mold. One manufacturing process, much less man hours in engineering and assembly.
Hmm. A brand new Swan is probably a few pennies more than yer FT10 or J/70 or Melges.I don't think anyone has ever bought a brand new Swan because they were looking to save money on costs.
Ah ya my mistake, it is retracting pole.The ClubSwan 80 is a retractable sprit- https://www.nautorswan.com/news/2020/09/clubswan-80-born-to-change-the-maxi-yachts-world/
"Retractable Carbon Sprit".
There certainly is a bit of engineering and man hours in implementing a bowsprit, but I would think that based on the size of these sprits (10+ feet) that adding the equivalent length of hull wouldn't be an attractive proposal at all. Nobody in this market is looking for a bargain on engineering or man hours (or they wouldn't be buying a new 80 foot racer-cruiser) and in any case, the added wetted surface caused by adding 10 feet to the bow would then drive a bigger rig, bigger sails, and...a bowsprit for the downwind sails.
The point you make about added complexity, man hours, etc is perfectly valid. It just likely is never going to be an issue for racing boats run on this sort of budget. I can see it being a factor in smaller cruising boats, where a fixed price point is important to development and build costs. I don't think anyone has ever bought a brand new Swan because they were looking to save money on costs.
Face paper. It's like toilet paper, but for the other end.What is FP?
It's a mythological place of doom, whose existence is disputed by logical positivists.What is FP?
It's funny how some people slag off something that enables them to join threads for freeIt's a mythological place of doom, whose existence is disputed by logical positivists.
Kinda like purgatory, but with snakepits and fire torture ... and shameless plug for advertisers.
If you are writing cheques to post in any SA threads, I have a bridge to sell you.It's funny how some people slag off something that enables them to join threads for free
WTF?If you are writing cheques to post in any SA threads, I have a bridge to sell you.