Not for nothing
Super Anarchist
Satellites,It is not possible to actually see 75% of the arctic ice disappear even if it happened, which it didn't.
ie;
Satellites,It is not possible to actually see 75% of the arctic ice disappear even if it happened, which it didn't.
Just out of curiosity what are you trying to illustrate with your graph that goes from 6.5 to 4.1?Satellites,
ie; View attachment 571551
If CO2 emissions are melting the arctic, what melted it way more 7000 years ago when CO2 was 260ppm?
The graph was just a view from space as an example. I didn't read the graph. so make want on That.Just out of curiosity what are you trying to illustrate with your graph that goes from 6.5 to 4.1?
Wine drunk day drinking again Randy? Tell us again Unka pullmedick how you retired so early having got yours by capitalism...Pakistan’s textile industry is in crisis – and women are bearing the brunt of its decline
as capitalism moves it's raping prick, from the poorest to the poorest. Leaving them nothing,
Wine drunk day drinking again Randy? Tell us again Unka pullmedick how you retired so early having got yours by capitalism...
I am told that CO2 is the control knob of the climate. Except for 7000 years ago?It couldn't possibly be two different things, could it?
Many things effect the earths cycles,I am told that CO2 is the control knob of the climate. Except for 7000 years ago?
Many things effect the earths cycles,
Talk about thousand years ago. this effected the climate,( before man came along)
Thought you like it, but agree and disagree, Yes the earth. solar system, milky way are always changing and mostly over long periods of time, But basically humans are polluting the planet in a very short time (100 years). compared to 1000's+ years, and a lot has to do with using fossil fuels.Golly gee whiz. Are you saying that it is actually changes in eccentricity, obliquity and precession that control the glaciations and not CO2? Remarkable.
I didn't see "not CO2" anywhere in there.Golly gee whiz. Are you saying that it is actually changes in eccentricity, obliquity and precession that control the glaciations and not CO2? Remarkable.
How did the polar bears fare 7,000 years ago when there was far less ice than there is now?I didn't see "not CO2" anywhere in there.
About $2.78 USD.How did the polar bears fare 7,000 years ago when there was far less ice than there is now?
Which "state" should we bring criminal charges against first?Climate crimes must be brought to justice
![]()
Climate denial has increased the risk of catastrophic global change. Should international criminal law be used against those who promote this dangerous trend? Economic and political leaders can no longer pretend it is business as usual. Whether they actively induce environmental harm or just ignore the existential threat against the survival of the human species, states and corporations must be held accountable for their actions or inaction regarding climate change.
True.Climate denial has increased the risk of catastrophic global change.
Which 'international criminal law'?Should international criminal law be used against those who promote this dangerous trend?
Many of them can and will.Economic and political leaders can no longer pretend it is business as usual.
Slowly, this is happening through regulation and market forces like ESG. It will not happen through "international criminal law", whatever that is.states and corporations must be held accountable for their actions or inaction regarding climate change.