as if these trending changes are going graph in a linear manner, right fuckwit?Just trying to make your stupidity official?
Think about it this way. You asked dog if the graph was "zero" implying that the data point would be "zero" if temperature were staying the same. That would be true if it were a graph of "rate of change" of temperature. But this is a graph of the actual temperature anomaly. So, if it stays the same anywhere from year to year, then it is not changing. So, if the temperature plotted at "0.8" for ten years in a row, that would mean there was ZERO rate of change.
You really aren't this stupid, are you?