I would use the hardware under question as a 2:1 tack line unless it's easy for you to access the tack/furler connection on your sprit. Otherwise getting the sail on/off is a pain. If the furler can be connected to that Harken Classic block is basically already setup for this.It does not. It's a storage pain in the ass. I've been watching your thread with interest.
It is true that folks who routinely fly Zero/Screachers competitively try to find ways to add luff tension to sail higher angles with them up. However, having broken the bow off my F242 a couple times and reinforcing it with 1/4" plate Stainless and watching that stainless bend over time, it might be best to wait to use a 2:1 until it is really needed. These boats are robust, but they are still breakable.I would use the hardware under question as a 2:1 tack line unless it's easy for you to access the tack/furler connection on your sprit. Otherwise getting the sail on/off is a pain. If the furler can be connected to that Harken Classic block is basically already setup for this.
Right, don't winch the crap out of the 2:1 tack line. The beauty of the 2:1 is that it effectively prevents rotation of the furler body although there are other options for doing that.It is true that folks who routinely fly Zero/Screachers competitively try to find ways to add luff tension to sail higher angles with them up. However, having broken the bow off my F242 a couple times and reinforcing it with 1/4" plate Stainless and watching that stainless bend over time, it might be best to wait to use a 2:1 until it is really needed. These boats are robust, but they are still breakable.
Yup. When the main isn't up, spin halyard to the port ama, screacher halyard to the starbord ama, tightened enough to remove/dampen any slop. Shrouds are just loose enough that mast rotation is uninhibited under light wind loading, which seems really loose when the main is down in sloppy wave conditions.At anchor or motoring with sails down you can use spare halyards to tighten things up athwartships and main halyard to main sheet to tighten it up fore-aft. Alternatively you can use a spare line to grab the shrouds and haul slack out with mainsheet. While sailing there will be some slack with sails up, doesn't hurt anything. Tuning beyond making sure the mast is vertical (shrouds the same length and tight) isn't needed. Hard to figure why your mast isn't rotating much with slack removed from shrouds, did previous owner relocate the boom attachment of the mainsheet to forward of the traveler? Boom provides the force to over rotate the mast which is why you have the limiter.
"Ah, Beer. The cause of and the solution to all the worlds problems." - Homer Simpson...just head back to the dock and drink nerve-calming beers (Smart Move #1). They worked. There. I admit it. F'd up big time. Other friends came by later, in their big Sea Ray, and asked us to join them (We did. They had lots of beer on hand.... Smart Move #2).
A small hole such as you describe will likely be able to be closed with just a heat gun. Some sacrificial additional plastic might make it easier. You are just looking for leak seal, not pressure seal, right?Not Corsair Specific: Honda (Scepter) tanks are rotomolded. My orig tank has a wear hole in an upper corner. Only an issue when full, but an issue. Bought a replacement tank, but want to keep the orig tank on board as well (better than a gas can -Easier to swap out tanks than trying to fill from a can). There are plenty of kits available to repair rotomolded plastic. Anyone had success doing this with gas tank/can? There's a cost/benefit analysis to consider as well (a Scepter tank (the maker of the Honda tank and identical to the Honda tank) is only $65 (wish I would have known this before buying my $100 Honda branded Scepter tank)). Kits run the gambit, price wise, but seems a bunch cost more than a replacement Scepter tank. I guess I just answered my question. Disregard.
Corsair C36/37Help.
Our f27 just sold. We had it for 15 years. Loved it. We're just getting to old for the lack of cruising comfort.
My wife wants a F31. Other than the increase in head room is it really a more comfortable as a cruiser? Clearly a more sailing performance but lets set that aside for a moment.
NW summertime live aboard for 30 days is the goal.
I'm ready for a 35' monomaran like a J 32 or some such for interior volume. I want shelter in the cockpit and good motoring at 5 knots to head further up the inside passage.
She gets seasick and has only ever sailed on the 2 trimarans we have owned and thinks she will hate a monohull leaner.
Will I be shocked if I get a monohull and discover that sailing at 6 knots is dull?
I would love a C36-7 but I think It is out of our budget.Corsair C36/37