Schrödinger's Dog?
Coup Coup Catchyou!
- Thread starter Sol Rosenberg
- Start date
Schrödinger's Dog?
badlatitude
Soros-backed
- 33,415
- 7,165
That starts to explain a lot.
FIFY
Nice!
Super Anarchist
Rudy has been pretty quiet lately. So has Meadows.
Nice!
Super Anarchist
Sol Rosenberg
Girthy Member
- Thread starter
- #386
And so has Sidney.
One can only hope.
Mrleft8
Super Anarchist
Isn't there a way to camo that parabolic mic? That's like wearing a Ghillie suit with a blaze orange knit hat on.
badlatitude
Soros-backed
- 33,415
- 7,165
I heard that four of the FBI technicians tasked with examining Mike Lindell's cell phone have been detained for a 72 hour mental health check.
Mrleft8
Super Anarchist
Braino Draino won't help what they probably found in there.... Yetch! I can't even imagine touching something that's been in his pocket!
Gouvernail
Lottsa people don’t know I’m famous
Just a reminder because the bullshitters really want everyone not to know this absolute truth:
No law enforcement agency my EVER seize a phone without having a warrant.
No warrant is EVER issued unless a judge is satisfied the phone contains pre-described evidence of a particular crime.
The FBI never has and never will “go grab a bunch of phones and hope to find something criminal they can hang on people they don’t like.
And…. In court, when prosecutors attempt to enter their evidence into the official records, they MUST PROVE the evidence was gathered according to the rules.
In other words, if the FBI just grabbed a bunch of phones and their justification for grabbing those phones is later found to be insufficiently perfect and by the books, ALL THE GATHERED EVIDENCE IS THROWN OUT!!!!
Using pillow guy as an example. If there was no due process to gain permission to seize his phone, whatever was on that phone can NEVER be used against Pillow dude.
However, if there was a proper warrant and if , while looking for the specified evidence, the FBI stumbles across evidence of other illegal activity, those doing the search may report that evidence to the appropriate authorities and additional investigations, and prosecutions could legally follow.
….. that is the “plain site” part of a search where the bag of heroin is sitting on the table but the cops were only searching for pot.
There is a procedure for expanding the search . The officers must play by the official rules
Summary: Lindell’s phone was seized for specific reasons approved by a judge.
No law enforcement agency my EVER seize a phone without having a warrant.
No warrant is EVER issued unless a judge is satisfied the phone contains pre-described evidence of a particular crime.
The FBI never has and never will “go grab a bunch of phones and hope to find something criminal they can hang on people they don’t like.
And…. In court, when prosecutors attempt to enter their evidence into the official records, they MUST PROVE the evidence was gathered according to the rules.
In other words, if the FBI just grabbed a bunch of phones and their justification for grabbing those phones is later found to be insufficiently perfect and by the books, ALL THE GATHERED EVIDENCE IS THROWN OUT!!!!
Using pillow guy as an example. If there was no due process to gain permission to seize his phone, whatever was on that phone can NEVER be used against Pillow dude.
However, if there was a proper warrant and if , while looking for the specified evidence, the FBI stumbles across evidence of other illegal activity, those doing the search may report that evidence to the appropriate authorities and additional investigations, and prosecutions could legally follow.
….. that is the “plain site” part of a search where the bag of heroin is sitting on the table but the cops were only searching for pot.
There is a procedure for expanding the search . The officers must play by the official rules
Summary: Lindell’s phone was seized for specific reasons approved by a judge.
Mrleft8
Super Anarchist
Pillow guy.... I think he needs a new name.
From now on I will refer to him as "Fluffy".
From now on I will refer to him as "Fluffy".
Sol Rosenberg
Girthy Member
- Thread starter
- #393
There have been search warrants for grabbing phones, so judges have found that there is probable cause that those phones contain evidence of a crime.
My guess is obstruction. That would explain the sudden switch to in person meetings.
My guess is obstruction. That would explain the sudden switch to in person meetings.
badlatitude
Soros-backed
- 33,415
- 7,165
Fluffer would be more accurate.
Hardee haha?
Pertinacious Tom
Importunate Member
That's true for the minority of Americans, who live far from our borders, but for most of us, the border exception applies.
Olsonist
Disgusting Liberal Elitist
New Trump Attorney Negotiated $3 Million Advance Payment for Work
The deal reached by Chris Kise reflects the high-profile, unprecedented nature of the investigation—and the former president’s reputation for not paying some legal bills.
www.wsj.com
P_Wop
Super Anarchist
New Trump Attorney Negotiated $3 Million Advance Payment for Work
The deal reached by Chris Kise reflects the high-profile, unprecedented nature of the investigation—and the former president’s reputation for not paying some legal bills.
I hope he didn't take a personal check. Bank wire only.
