Olsonist
Disgusting Liberal Elitist
I can live with that.When others put you on their "Ignore" list, it blocks you from seeing their posts.
I can live with that.When others put you on their "Ignore" list, it blocks you from seeing their posts.
I have yet to not be able to figure out which bullshit of the day some bullshitter is repeating by seeing the responses that people make to said bullshitter. It makes things much more simple.I can live with that.
That command structure is literally on the DC NG wedsite. Your sources are lying to you.Your source does not square with various other sources. Someone is not telling the straight story.
All the more reason for the Jan6 committee to get to the truth. But they are not doing that, nor will they.
These days you can quote them, and it's STILL invisible. Makes some of the conversations a little hard to follow, but I can tell that insufferable7 is just being a dick again.
I have... That's why I don't see any of his shite.A dick? He's a lying shithead. Ignore him.
When others put you on their "Ignore" list, it blocks you from seeing their posts.
That was the old regime. The new regime is more better although I use it more sparingly. The new regime is I don’t see your posts, your votes or quotes of your posts. AND you don’t see mine.Only if it's checked to be a 2-way ignore. I have the idiots on basic ignore, so they can see my posts calling them lying shitheads.
Try to keep up. I have already said that I will not defend the unlawful acts of those that got violent or illegally entered the Capitol. They have most all been charged and many (most?) are still in jail awaiting a hearing.Legal and lawful peaceful protest. And you wonder why I ridicule you? I hope you get paid to embarrass yourself like this.
"Fight like hell", and then he sat on his (tiny) hands for 3+ hours.Try to keep up. I have already said that I will not defend the unlawful acts of those that got violent or illegally entered the Capitol. They have most all been charged and many (most?) are still in jail awaiting a hearing.
The "legal and lawful peaceful protest" is what Trump asked for. Many kept it that way. Obviously some did not and they are rightfully paying for it. Trump never asked for violence or breaking and entering.
"Fight like hell", and then he sat on his (tiny) hands for 3+ hours.
That was the old regime. The new regime is more better although I use it more sparingly. The new regime is I don’t see your posts, your votes or quotes of your posts. AND you don’t see mine.
Good grief. That one has been discussed ad nauseam in the press long ago."Fight like hell",
Good grief. That one has been discussed ad nauseam in the press long ago.
If that is a bad thing to ask for them indict every cheerleading team in the country.
But there are still some haters who are clinging to every imaginary thing they can think of. Think "common harmless rhetoric".
Not harmless rhetoric: what Schumer and Waters have publicly said.
Trump knew they were armed before he told them to fight like hell.Good grief. That one has been discussed ad nauseam in the press long ago.
If that is a bad thing to ask for them indict every cheerleading team in the country.
But there are still some haters who are clinging to every imaginary thing they can think of. Think "common harmless rhetoric".
Not harmless rhetoric: what Schumer and Waters have publicly said.
Shifting the goalposts from Trump offering to Pelosi to the Capitol police recommending to the SA is a sign if dishonesty on your part, unless, of course, you acknowledge your original assertion was wrong.
![]()
PolitiFact - No, Capitol security is not only Pelosi’s responsibility, but she bears some
More than six weeks after supporters of then-President Donald Trump stormed the U.S. Capitol, posts spread on Facebook cwww.politifact.com
[edit] IMO Irving was trying a CYA with that last sentence. Even Trump knew that this would be an event that would likely attract a large crowd (no law against peacefully demonstrating outside the Capitol, which is what Trump asked for). And Trump and others knew or should have known the potential for that crowd to get out of control. Irving was lying about the intelligence reports.
- Capitol security is not solely the responsibility of the House speaker. It is provided by the sergeants-at-arms of the House and Senate, and by the Capitol Police.
- The House sergeant-at-arms reports to the House speaker, or Pelosi at the time of the attack. The Senate sergeant-at-arms reports to the Senate majority leader — on Jan. 6, Sen. Mitch McConnell.
- News reports indicate that in the days before the attack, House sergeant-at-arms Paul Irving resisted calls from the Capitol Police to bring in the National Guard for extra security at the Capitol because of “optics.” Irving later testified that intelligence reports didn’t show the need for the extra security, not that he rejected it because of optics.