Distance- the northern route is half as far. Carrying supplies will be the main impediment, as stated already.Interesting that the planned route is Newfoundland-England, not across the Atlantic via the Trades to Caribbean. Wonder why? Shorter? Seems rougher/colder.
In the instances I've noticed in the past, the Coast Guard tends to let daredevils/adventurers/fools carry on unless there's family pleading with them to stop their nutty relative (and the relative is indeed nutty), or it becomes newsworthy in a way that raises a ruckus. In general, if the adventurer appears to be of sound mind, experienced in similar risky stuff, and determined to do it, they tend not to stop them. And enough crazy-ass attempts of this type have succeeded that it gives them some cover.It is called a "manifestly unsafe voyage"The USCG or whomever can stop these things if they can be arsed to.
I've been stopped twice for a manifestly unsafe voyage. Both times on a Laser, both times it was untrue.It is called a "manifestly unsafe voyage"The USCG or whomever can stop these things if they can be arsed to.
Wow. Really? Their reason was what?I've been stopped twice for a manifestly unsafe voyage. Both times on a Laser, both times it was untrue.
Someone tried to stop us once.I've been stopped twice for a manifestly unsafe voyage. Both times on a Laser, both times it was untrue.
Since he won’t be able to open any hatches underway, what with there being WAVES and stuff in the ocean, the colder route is WAY preferable. He’d roast to death on the southern route.Interesting that the planned route is Newfoundland-England, not across the Atlantic via the Trades to Caribbean. Wonder why? Shorter? Seems rougher/colder.
Each time I was pretty far off shore of St. Pete Beach in the Gulf of Mexico. Each time they looked at me and said "No way!" Each time they gave me a citation (but no financial penalty) and each time I was able to avoid getting craned aboard.Wow. Really? Their reason was what?
Why?
Just a stupid, meaningless stunt.
A wave in the ocean?Since he won’t be able to open any hatches underway, what with there being WAVES and stuff in the ocean, the colder route is WAY preferable. He’d roast to death on the southern route.
If you are boring, just say that.Good on him
Now can he sign a waiver that no coast guard/naval vessel is going to have to come out and save him?
They are already closing down local stations due to budget constraints.
They should not have to risk lives and piss away fuel to recover dumb asses from their own folly.
Ever see the size of the oil rig support ships used to service the offshore rigs? They fucking huge (200-500') for a reason.
https://horizonship.com/ship/199-anchor-handling-tug-supply-vessel-2005/
Have such idiots raise funds to pay for such emergency services first. They can get a cut of the action from the local bookies on what day he bails on this endevour.
Or the over under the rudder snaps off the first time that thing inverts.
Idiots like this just reinforce the public's opinion of sailors being a bunch of rich clueless jackasses.
Short Bus Anarchy more like it.How about ShortLifeExpectancy Anarchy?
You're assuming of course that the water will be flowing from the front to the back. I'd say he's got it right as even though the bow will be pointing in the direction of travel, both the wind and waves will be moving from back to front!![]()
Especially beyond the Environment,,,A wave in the ocean?
Chance in a million!
Or George Sigler (Experiment in Survival). But that wasn't solo...I think. Been some circuits since I read that crazy story.