If the laptop can be verified and the incriminating emails it contains can be verified, I'm not seeing how it's not be admissible. Add firsthand corroborating testimony from Tony Bobulinski and it looks to me like a case. You, however may be right. We shall see.Again, I’m not denying the laptop exists and has potentially interesting details of Hunters life and business.
I’m doubting a case can be built upon it because of American laws of evidence. I don’t even think you can justify opening a case based solely on the laptop due to the concept of “fruit of the poisoned tree.”
And I don’t need to disparage Rudy’s reputation. He has shown himself as one who wants to conspire with foreign powers to slander Joe Biden and help Donald Trump. Not sure why you want his last minute games to help determine the results of an election, but it’s probably because you hate America’s democracy and it’s laws.