Blue Crab
benthivore
The failing NYT?Tech experts hired by the NYT and CBS disagree.
The failing NYT?Tech experts hired by the NYT and CBS disagree.
In the grand scheme of things done by President Biden about which I can be outraged, that barely moves the needle.Speaking of concern about lies. What do you make of Joe Biden's claim that he never spoke to his son about his business dealings?
Is that under your current ID, or the previous one? Under this one, not so much.That should be obvious.
How are you coming with that example of me disparaging a source to discredit a story?
The failing NYT?
I didn't ask for examples of me mentioning a news source, of course I do that. Got any examples of me disparaging a source to discredit a story like you do?Is that under your current ID, or the previous one? Under this one, not so much.
Under your previous one, you made many comments about MSNBC (to pick one). Most were not favorable. I have faith you'll demand a specific post, in which you display a level of disdain only you can evaluate as sufficient. If I were to produce such a thing, you'd seek to change the subject.
I cite the bias of the "news" sources you often use. That they are frequently labeled as "far right" and reasons given like "failed fact checks" and "questionable due to poor sources" is not me.I didn't ask for examples of me mentioning a news source, of course I do that. Got any examples of me disparaging a source to discredit a story like you do?
Yeah but the NYP says ...I am not a lawyer and even I could get this "case" thrown out of court in about an hour. Ladies and gentlemen, we need to talk about "chain of custody and rules of evidence". This laptop has been poked more times than a $10 hooker during Fleet Week.
* if there ever was some kind of legal case here, all the Magatty fucking around has made it 100% certain it can never be prosecuted![]()
All that matters to the Faithful is that this case be prosecuted in the Court of Public Opinion.I am not a lawyer and even I could get this "case" thrown out of court in about an hour. Ladies and gentlemen, we need to talk about "chain of custody and rules of evidence". This laptop has been poked more times than a $10 hooker during Fleet Week.
* if there ever was some kind of legal case here, all the Magatty fucking around has made it 100% certain it can never be prosecuted![]()
If you are disparaging a news source, it would seem to me that by definition you are disparaging the stories they publish. Is that not the case?I didn't ask for examples of me mentioning a news source, of course I do that. Got any examples of me disparaging a source to discredit a story like you do?
Edited for accuracy.I didn't ask for examples of me mentioning a news source, of course I do that. Got any examples of me disparaging a source to discredit a story like you do - that I will accept as indicating I do what is alleged?
They probably couldn't care less if it is 100% bullshit, which it probably is. It makes them feel good about hating Biden, which is all they really need.All that matters to the Faithful is that this case be prosecuted in the Court of Public Opinion.
That way, allegations are accepted without evidence and “testimony” isn’t constrained by that whole “under oath” foolishness.
No, suspect sources can publish true stories.If you are disparaging a news source, it would seem to me that by definition you are disparaging the stories they publish. Is that not the case?
I'll take that as a no.Edited for accuracy.
Take it any way you'd like.I'll take that as a no.
Now who's the crybaby.Take it any way you'd like.
You have proven you will do your best to weasel out of anything. That is why you are careful to be sufficiently vague in any statements you make, or the rare question you answer. You prefer not to take a firm stance, in case you need to disavow it, at a later date.
Calling you on your schtick ≠ "crybaby".Now who's the crybaby.
They can, but that is a good argument.No, suspect sources can publish true stories.
He's subconsciously coming to the realization that he's member of cult and that his world view is made of nothing but a tissue of lies. His conscious mind cannot accept that. Thus we are witnessing a mental breakdown of a very serious nature. Back before I put him on ignore, I begged him over and over again to seek help.Calling you on your schtick ≠ "crybaby".
You've really changed. Something must've happened to you.