Do you trust Barr?

Nailing Malarkey Too

Super Anarchist
2,001
64
If I’m not mistaken, Mr. Mueller was charged with investigating more than just “collusion”.

Please point out to the class where anyone promoted the “collusion” angle since the Barr letter was released. 

Schiff: There is still ‘significant evidence of collusion’


https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/24/schiff-mueller-trump-collusion-1233336

You’re welcome!
"anyone" 

I think that is what the class calls being owned. 

 

The Joker

Super Anarchist
8,312
743
World of Shit
Mismoyled Jiblet. said:
Jesus, enough with the water carrying. Barr gave the White House access to the report on March 29th. The delay had everything to do with covering the ass of the President. Which is why we got it released on Thursday before a holiday weekend.
Liar. 

[SIZE=17pt]■ Mr. Barr said during a news conference that he gave Mr. Trump’s lawyers advance access this week to Mr. Mueller’s report before it was to be sent to Congress and made public. Mr. Trump’s lawyers did not ask for any redactions.[/SIZE]

 
Last edited by a moderator:

A guy in the Chesapeake

Super Anarchist
23,965
1,167
Virginia
Mismoyled Jiblet. said:
Jesus, enough with the water carrying. Barr gave the White House access to the report on March 29th. The delay had everything to do with covering the ass of the President. Which is why we got it released on Thursday before a holiday weekend.
And that has exactly what to do with my response to Dylan?  

 

The Joker

Super Anarchist
8,312
743
World of Shit
Mismoyled Jiblet. said:
Because you still act like this wait had to do with process. It didn't.  Trump's personal counsel got access to the redacted report earlier this week. Everything about this is the AG covering the ass of the President.
So you now agree that it was earlier this week not back in March.  Good puppy 

 

The Joker

Super Anarchist
8,312
743
World of Shit
Mismoyled Jiblet. said:
Trump's personal counsel is different than the White House, liar. You are flailing early comrade, they might have to bring in the big @Dog
So produce a cite that proves what you are claiming.  Because the AG testified under oath that the WH did not get a copy. 

 

Rumbulls

Super Anarchist
7,234
5
Boyne City
Oye… what a shit show over nothing.

2yr investigation for nothing.   Every post wasted on nothing.   It really fires up those who believed in the big spaghetti monster, called collusion.   All the hot air.

What time are your therapist appointments today?

 

The Joker

Super Anarchist
8,312
743
World of Shit
Oye… what a shit show over nothing.

2yr investigation for nothing.   Every post wasted on nothing.   It really fires up those who believed in the big spaghetti monster, called collusion.   All the hot air.

What time are your therapist appointments today?
Don’t worry they will spend the next two years second guessing Mueller, Rosenstein and Barr claiming there was obstruction.  Completely ignoring that their was no crime to obstruct. 

 

ShortForBob

Super Anarchist
34,883
2,776
Melbourne
It;s actually pretty funny. On the obstruction of Justice, Barr essentially said Trumps not guilty, he;s just a great big baby and had a tanty :D

 

The Joker

Super Anarchist
8,312
743
World of Shit
Mismoyled Jiblet. said:
Following my March 29th letter, the Office of the White House Counsel requested the opportunity to review the redacted version of the report in order to advise the President on the potential invocation of privilege, which is consistent with long-standing practice.  Following that review, the President confirmed that, in the interests of transparency and full disclosure to the American people, he would not assert privilege over the Special Counsel’s report.  Accordingly, the public report I am releasing today contains redactions only for the four categories that I previously outlined, and no material has been redacted based on executive privilege. 

In addition, earlier this week, the President’s personal counsel requested and were given the opportunity to read a final version of the redacted report before it was publicly released.  That request was consistent with the practice followed under the Ethics in Government Act, which permitted individuals named in a report prepared by an Independent Counsel the opportunity to read the report before publication.  The President’s personal lawyers were not permitted to make, and did not request, any redactions. 
Yes you idiot the letter was sent on March 29.  

The redacted report was given earlier this week.  You do understand that the president has every right to see the report to decide if parts were subject to executive privilege. 

To his credit Trump, for the good of the country he decided NOT to exert that privilege 

 

BillDBastard

Member
127
17
So then the question begs, do you believe Robert Mueller?

Since what AG Barr's task was to redact Mueller's report, masking anything that references individuals who were questioned as part of the investigation but are not under indictment and to redact anything that may jeopardize national security.... in accordance with the law..... are you saying Barr has otherwise altered The Mueller Report?

 

Latest posts




Top