"anyone"If I’m not mistaken, Mr. Mueller was charged with investigating more than just “collusion”.
Please point out to the class where anyone promoted the “collusion” angle since the Barr letter was released.
Schiff: There is still ‘significant evidence of collusion’
Liar.Mismoyled Jiblet. said:Jesus, enough with the water carrying. Barr gave the White House access to the report on March 29th. The delay had everything to do with covering the ass of the President. Which is why we got it released on Thursday before a holiday weekend.
And that has exactly what to do with my response to Dylan?Mismoyled Jiblet. said:Jesus, enough with the water carrying. Barr gave the White House access to the report on March 29th. The delay had everything to do with covering the ass of the President. Which is why we got it released on Thursday before a holiday weekend.
So you now agree that it was earlier this week not back in March. Good puppyMismoyled Jiblet. said:Because you still act like this wait had to do with process. It didn't. Trump's personal counsel got access to the redacted report earlier this week. Everything about this is the AG covering the ass of the President.
So produce a cite that proves what you are claiming. Because the AG testified under oath that the WH did not get a copy.Mismoyled Jiblet. said:
Don’t worry they will spend the next two years second guessing Mueller, Rosenstein and Barr claiming there was obstruction. Completely ignoring that their was no crime to obstruct.Oye… what a shit show over nothing.
2yr investigation for nothing. Every post wasted on nothing. It really fires up those who believed in the big spaghetti monster, called collusion. All the hot air.
What time are your therapist appointments today?
Yes you idiot the letter was sent on March 29.Mismoyled Jiblet. said:Following my March 29th letter, the Office of the White House Counsel requested the opportunity to review the redacted version of the report in order to advise the President on the potential invocation of privilege, which is consistent with long-standing practice. Following that review, the President confirmed that, in the interests of transparency and full disclosure to the American people, he would not assert privilege over the Special Counsel’s report. Accordingly, the public report I am releasing today contains redactions only for the four categories that I previously outlined, and no material has been redacted based on executive privilege.
In addition, earlier this week, the President’s personal counsel requested and were given the opportunity to read a final version of the redacted report before it was publicly released. That request was consistent with the practice followed under the Ethics in Government Act, which permitted individuals named in a report prepared by an Independent Counsel the opportunity to read the report before publication. The President’s personal lawyers were not permitted to make, and did not request, any redactions.
So then the question begs, do you believe Robert Mueller?