Drip Drip Drip

phillysailor

Super Anarchist
8,890
3,672
Jeff+Guy will be along shortly to tell us that there was no Russian election interference except for Hillary who the Democrats shouldn’t have nominated so that we wouldn’t have gotten Shitstain. It’s really the Democrats fault. Belief me.
The truth is probably more likely that both sides were compromised, just in different ways. 

The investigation is about national security, and how it is put in jeopardy by social media plus the same old base desires: money, sex and power.

 

Olsonist

Disgusting Liberal Elitist
30,023
4,571
New Oak City
I haven’t read anything credible that said Hillary’s campaign was anything but a target. The Steele report was contracted through a law firm cut out.

 

Sol Rosenberg

Girthy Member
95,323
12,542
Earth
Yeah, but they've moved on and doubled down on the "there'll be no conviction for collusion". They like that since collusion isn't a crime, regardless of the crimes that one commits & can be indicted/convicted for that constitute collusion, so they can word game their way around being wrong. Still, this thread is going to be a goldmine later. Whichever way it goes, the Dog/Sol quote dredging will be most amusing. 
The rule of law is what is important. Nobody, not one single person is above the law. So far, there have been a bunch of convictions for trying to subvert the process, and the rule of law. 

 

Mrleft8

Super Anarchist
27,424
4,051
Suwanee River
The truth is probably more likely that both sides were compromised, just in different ways. 

The investigation is about national security, and how it is put in jeopardy by social media plus the same old base desires: money, sex and power.
Sex?.... How did I miss that part?..... Or are you talking about Butina and Erickson?..... Or the Peepee tapes?.....

 How do I miss all the good stuff!?

 

Dog

Super Anarchist
37,940
442
I haven’t read anything credible that said Hillary’s campaign was anything but a target. The Steele report was contracted through a law firm cut out.
The dossier consisted of information, or dis-information, solicited from Kremlin officials and was funded by the Hillary campaign and the DNC.

 

A guy in the Chesapeake

Super Anarchist
23,965
1,167
Virginia
Jeff+Guy will be along shortly to tell us that there was no Russian election interference except for Hillary who the Democrats shouldn’t have nominated so that we wouldn’t have gotten Shitstain. It’s really the Democrats fault. Belief me.
Why would I need to say anything when you obviously know what I think about everything, and are more than willing to suggest that your opinion of my thoughts is a more accurate representation of my position than what I actually said?  

 

Olsonist

Disgusting Liberal Elitist
30,023
4,571
New Oak City
The dossier consisted of information, or dis-information, solicited from Kremlin officials and was funded by the Hillary campaign and the DNC.
The DNC and Hillary campaign paid Perkins Coie as a cutout. The Steele dossier used Russian sources about ... Kremlin officials. The same dossier had earlier been funded by Republicans although it's not clear there was a cutout.

The issue was whether the Hillary campaign was compromised by the Russians, compromised meaning doing the bidding of the Russians. Again I've seen nothing credible to indicate that. Indeed Hillary walked all over Putin in her time as Secretary of State. She even got him to sell Gaddafi down the river.

 

Remodel

Super Anarchist
10,328
924
None
Mismoyled Jiblet. said:
Putin hated feared Hillary. Is there any doubt to that?
FIFY

I remember a time when Romney was running that Russia was a menace that the Obama Administration severely underestimated. Imagine if O-man had caved to Putin like Donny Boy.

IMAGINE!

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Navig8tor

Super Anarchist
7,675
2,062
plus serious cash for “event space” at a Trump hotel.

Poor Mueller is trying to tie this up but Team America keep dropping another gift of an illicit nature in his lap.

 

Mid

Blues Rule
Monday night, ABC News reported that investigators subpoenaed documents from the inauguration committee. Today ProPublica adds another key detail, confirming that the inauguration did pay the exorbitant $175,000 fee to the Trump Hotel. And it quotes tax law experts describing this as an obvious crime. “It could be a tax law violation,” Brett Kappel, an attorney at Akerman LLP who advises nonprofits, tells ProPublica.
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/trumps-inaugural-crimes-hotel-investigation.html

 

Bus Driver

Bacon Quality Control Specialist
Are such payments okay?  I don't know.  Multi-millionaires getting their legal fees covered by hard working Americans.

That said, I have no doubt the Faithful are cool with their donations being used that way.

If it were being done by their opposition, they'd be calling them names for being fleeced like that.

 

Bent Sailor

Super Anarchist
14,395
404
Lake Macquarie
The dossier consisted of information, or dis-information, solicited from Kremlin officials and was funded by the Hillary campaign and the DNC.
...and the Republicans. Unlike other Russian contacts, it didn't have offers/requests for political favours as a price. But you keep chewing on that bone, Dog. Maybe, one day, you'll even believe you're not being dishonest about the equivalence... just don't expect to convince anyone else of that. 

 

Navig8tor

Super Anarchist
7,675
2,062
See Whitaker excelled at being an evasive asshole , this boy is buying Donnie time, nothing else, what a dick,

The gall to tell the chairman his times up, what a precious little prick and after the testimony he goes to trumps hotel-WTF?

No Collusion here officer.

Widely reported HuffPost Wapo etc.

 

Sol Rosenberg

Girthy Member
95,323
12,542
Earth
Are such payments okay?  I don't know.  Multi-millionaires getting their legal fees covered by hard working Americans.

That said, I have no doubt the Faithful are cool with their donations being used that way.

If it were being done by their opposition, they'd be calling them names for being fleeced like that.
Having a Campaign is like having a charitable foundation. It is a great way to get people to cover your expenses. 

 

Dog

Super Anarchist
37,940
442
...and the Republicans. Unlike other Russian contacts, it didn't have offers/requests for political favours as a price. But you keep chewing on that bone, Dog. Maybe, one day, you'll even believe you're not being dishonest about the equivalence... just don't expect to convince anyone else of that. 
I wasn't drawing an equilivance. I know of no equilivant Trump campaign initiative that procured political dirt from the Russians.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bent Sailor

Super Anarchist
14,395
404
Lake Macquarie
I know of no equilivant Trump campaign initiative that procured political dirt from the Russians.
You're right. You know that they attempted a campaign initiative to procure political dirt from the Russians. That the Russians did not pony up enough to go through with it doesn't change the legality of said attempt. 

Keep bringing up the Steele dossier though. It's good to know you have nothing. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Dog

Super Anarchist
37,940
442
You're right. You know that they attempted a campaign initiative to procure political dirt from the Russians. That the Russians did not pony up enough to go through with it doesn't change the legality of said attempt. 

Keep bringing up the Steele dossier though. It's good to know you have nothing. 
Really....And what is the legality of said attempt?

 




Top