The truth is probably more likely that both sides were compromised, just in different ways.
The rule of law is what is important. Nobody, not one single person is above the law. So far, there have been a bunch of convictions for trying to subvert the process, and the rule of law.
Sex?.... How did I miss that part?..... Or are you talking about Butina and Erickson?..... Or the Peepee tapes?.....
The dossier consisted of information, or dis-information, solicited from Kremlin officials and was funded by the Hillary campaign and the DNC.
Why would I need to say anything when you obviously know what I think about everything, and are more than willing to suggest that your opinion of my thoughts is a more accurate representation of my position than what I actually said?
The DNC and Hillary campaign paid Perkins Coie as a cutout. The Steele dossier used Russian sources about ... Kremlin officials. The same dossier had earlier been funded by Republicans although it's not clear there was a cutout.
plus serious cash for “event space” at a Trump hotel.
Are such payments okay? I don't know. Multi-millionaires getting their legal fees covered by hard working Americans.
...and the Republicans. Unlike other Russian contacts, it didn't have offers/requests for political favours as a price. But you keep chewing on that bone, Dog. Maybe, one day, you'll even believe you're not being dishonest about the equivalence... just don't expect to convince anyone else of that.
Having a Campaign is like having a charitable foundation. It is a great way to get people to cover your expenses.
I wasn't drawing an equilivance. I know of no equilivant Trump campaign initiative that procured political dirt from the Russians.
You're right. You know that they attempted a campaign initiative to procure political dirt from the Russians. That the Russians did not pony up enough to go through with it doesn't change the legality of said attempt.
