Drip Drip Drip

Dog

Super Anarchist
37,940
444
For simply drawinv conclusions? No. 

For complaining about others having done so when they do? Yes. 

I've mentioned before that I have no respect for hypocrites. Don't like that? Don't be a fucking hypocrite. Simple. 
I havn't complained about others drawing conclusions...That would appear to be you.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

hasher

Super Anarchist
6,981
1,215
Insanity
Yeah...Lots of people have drawn conclusions. You have a problem with that?
Sherlock Holmes understood that you complete the investigation.  So far, the folks don chose have had a bad time of it.  I would hope that people around him say it be best to go to Mar-a-Lago and not come back.

 

Dog

Super Anarchist
37,940
444
Sherlock Holmes understood that you complete the investigation.  So far, the folks don chose have had a bad time of it.  I would hope that people around him say it be best to go to Mar-a-Lago and not come back.
Well, if it's compleated investigations you want so far we have two. Both concluded that the Trump campaign did not collude with the Russians.

 

hasher

Super Anarchist
6,981
1,215
Insanity
Well, if it's compleated investigations you want so far we have two. Both concluded that the Trump campaign did not collude with the Russians.
Mr. Goof Butt.  The little thing the about to be not so a grand old party did is cover their collective asses.  Good luck.

 

Dog

Super Anarchist
37,940
444
Are you of the opinion the investigation headed by Rep. Nunes was objective and interested in fact-finding?
Yes, pretty much. It was subject to constant scrutiny. Do you expect objectivity from a prosecutor?

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Lifted Tack

Super Anarchist
1,145
69
That's two investigations now (House and Senate) that have come up empty.  0 for 2 and counting.
And how many of the witnesses before those committees have been indicted or pled guilty to lying to Congress?

Oh, that's right. You don't answer questions if they are inconvenient to you warped world view.

 

Dog

Super Anarchist
37,940
444
Mismoyled Jiblet. said:
By the Hillary standard don't we get 3, at least? And we can still chant "Lock him up" years later?
By the Hillary standard there would only be a "matter" and no investigation.

 

Dog

Super Anarchist
37,940
444
And how many of the witnesses before those committees have been indicted or pled guilty to lying to Congress?

Oh, that's right. You don't answer questions if they are inconvenient to you warped world view.
I have no idea, how many?

 

phillysailor

Super Anarchist
9,404
4,157
Yes, pretty much. It was subject to constant scrutiny. Do you expect objectivity from a prosecutor?
See, this is the point I don’t understand.

Why is it that investigations into Hillary should be full and complete, and the meeting on the tarmac between the AG and Bill C was horrible, but Devin Nunes bringing info to Trump is ok?

Your double standards are showing. 

Investigations should be adversarial if the subjects being investigated display a pattern of lying. Trump and company have clearly established that truth and cooperation is not their first or second choice. Indictments, guilty pleas, prison sentences and more have proven this to the public.

By working cooperatively with the Trump administration, Devin Nunes’ partisan behavior, actions and statements clearly showed his “investigation “ to be a farce. It was most likely more than that... IMO it was an extension of the cover up that started with Michael Flynn, the firing of Comey and the side deals Manafort was making with Russians.

Americans who lie, cover up and obstruct investigations deserve rigorous investigation and prosecution if indicated. @Dog clearly thinks this rule should only apply to Hillary.

 

Dog

Super Anarchist
37,940
444
See, this is the point I don’t understand.

Why is it that investigations into Hillary should be full and complete, and the meeting on the tarmac between the AG and Bill C was horrible, but Devin Nunes bringing info to Trump is ok?

Your double standards are showing. 

Investigations should be adversarial if the subjects being investigated display a pattern of lying. Trump and company have clearly established that truth and cooperation is not their first or second choice. Indictments, guilty pleas, prison sentences and more have proven this to the public.

By working cooperatively with the Trump administration, Devin Nunes’ partisan behavior, actions and statements clearly showed his “investigation “ to be a farce. It was most likely more than that... IMO it was an extension of the cover up that started with Michael Flynn, the firing of Comey and the side deals Manafort was making with Russians.

Americans who lie, cover up and obstruct investigations deserve rigorous investigation and prosecution if indicated. @Dog clearly thinks this rule should only apply to Hillary.
And yet the house investigation came to the same conclusion as the Senate investigation.

And BTW... where do you get this notion that I think only Hillary associates should be prosecuted? That's bullshit.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Dog

Super Anarchist
37,940
444
So your belief is the government is filled with people who hate Republicans and protect Democratic folks?  Do you know how stupid that is?
Not filled, but if you think there are not any you've been living under a rock.

 
Top