I might be wrong, but I didn't catch a conclusion that stated the "president committed X crime and here is the evidence" or "we found no evidence of a crime therefore he is innocent." I for one find that slightly ambiguous, I doubt I'm the only one so seeking clarification seems reasonable.
Drip Drip Drip
- Thread starter Sol Rosenberg
- Start date
Ease the sheet.
ignoring stupid people is easy
- 20,349
- 2,342
Bad things happen when good men vote for someone not on the ballot....
Right, but given that this is important, and that there are a huge number of citizens that get their information in all manner of formats and from many different sources. one more set off cliff notes, straight from Mueller, on TV seems like it might clear things up a bit for a lot of people.
Yeah, but it's easy to forget that, I guess because there is some inherent disappointment that the day after the report came out Trump wasn't in an orange jumpsuit.
Sol Rosenberg
Girthy Member
- Thread starter
- #19,688
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/452993-juan-williams-gop-in-a-panic-over-mueller
He's right, but unfortunately there are too many people who cannot read or be bothered to do so. The GOP Bumper Nutz coalition.
Steam Flyer
Sophisticated Yet Humble
Mrleft8
Super Anarchist
I've noticed that they've started going light on the hair dye lately..... It's no longer Donald McRonald orange..... Just a slightly tangerine spritz in the platinum gray.
Cal20sailor
Super Anarchist
Ignorance to a large degree has been your choice. Revel in it like a dog that takes a shit and rolls in it.
your child like belief in congress is touching
who do you think will come out looking better - a bunch of rabid politicians in full election mode, or the guy that took down gotti?
Sol Rosenberg
Girthy Member
- Thread starter
- #19,694
https://trucknutz.com/
Ask for the no collusion special! Guaaaaraaanteed to make librul heads explode.
Ask for the no collusion special! Guaaaaraaanteed to make librul heads explode.
Mike G
Super Anarchist
Curious, but not sure how deep the "government" went on this.
If Barr had his hands in it we know where it's going.
If Barr had his hands in it we know where it's going.
Last edited by a moderator:
Sol Rosenberg
Girthy Member
- Thread starter
- #19,696
Sean
Super Anarchist
Criminal contempt that is.......
[SIZE=17pt]House Holds Barr and Ross in Contempt Over Census Dispute[/SIZE]
Excerpt -
Wednesday’s contempt vote formally authorized the Oversight Committee to take Mr. Barr and Mr. Ross to federal court to seek judicial enforcement of subpoenas for the material in question. A lawsuit is expected in the coming weeks, and the administration has maintained it is on firm legal footing in its position.
It also leveled a stinging personal rebuke to Mr. Barr and Mr. Ross by formally referring them to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution. There is no real risk the department will pursue the case — Mr. Barr is the head of the Justice Department — but only once before has Congress held in contempt a sitting member of a presidential cabinet: Eric H. Holder Jr., President Barack Obama’s first attorney general.
[SIZE=17pt]House Holds Barr and Ross in Contempt Over Census Dispute[/SIZE]
Excerpt -
Wednesday’s contempt vote formally authorized the Oversight Committee to take Mr. Barr and Mr. Ross to federal court to seek judicial enforcement of subpoenas for the material in question. A lawsuit is expected in the coming weeks, and the administration has maintained it is on firm legal footing in its position.
It also leveled a stinging personal rebuke to Mr. Barr and Mr. Ross by formally referring them to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution. There is no real risk the department will pursue the case — Mr. Barr is the head of the Justice Department — but only once before has Congress held in contempt a sitting member of a presidential cabinet: Eric H. Holder Jr., President Barack Obama’s first attorney general.
Last edited by a moderator:
Mrleft8
Super Anarchist
Sol Rosenberg
Girthy Member
- Thread starter
- #19,699
