The point made about the perfect height of the outrigger being barely above the surface to maintain perfect balance but without the extra wheel's drag was cool too.Cool design. It appears that the trimming inputs act against what looks like a liftgate cylinder. Release pressure and the liftgate moves the trim tab to de power the wing.
Not surprised. It is the same in any proa. Some of the speed increase also comes from the improved CLR/CE balance, where the steering wheel load is reduced due to less rounding up resistance.The point made about the perfect height of the outrigger being barely above the surface to maintain perfect balance but without the extra wheel's drag was cool too.
I rewatched a few of the interviews and speed runs of GreenBird. Richard Jenkins talked about how difficult it was to get everything tuned exactly right and get the exact wind/weather conditions.Not surprised. It is the same in any proa. Some of the speed increase also comes from the improved CLR/CE balance, where the steering wheel load is reduced due to less rounding up resistance.
Keeping it there for long enough periods of time for max speeds is the big challenge. On a straight track, you lose the ability to round/feather up into the wind to reduce heeling moment and maintain best VMG. Wing trimming needs to be precisely controllable and instantly responsive. Get it wrong and you really do come down with a bang, even on water. Don’t ask me how I know….
Ashby is pretty much the best around at understanding, anticipating and controlling foils, if anyone can do it, he can.
I've heard elsewhere that while Greenbird, as a completed land yacht, was approx 600kg, It was actually running a lot more weight for the record and was capable of being loaded up as needed. I think I remember it being 1,800kg, but not sure. Has anyone else heard, seen, or read the same?I rewatched a few of the interviews and speed runs of GreenBird. Richard Jenkins talked about how difficult it was to get everything tuned exactly right and get the exact wind/weather conditions.
As you mentioned, it is a matter of keeping things balanced long enough to gain enough speed. GreenBird was as light as possible at about 600 kg (steel only used in the bearings/wheels). Greenbird reach 120 miles/hr on numerous occasions while testing on a runway tarmacs before the runs on natural surfaces. NZ plans to add up to a ton of weight on the outrigger wheel to keep it down. I can't help but question the weight of the NZ racer. The weight doesn't affect the max speed, but it does affect the acceleration and how long the pilot has to keep everything in balance to reach that top speed. So if the NZ raver is 2 to 3 times heavier than GreenBird, the acceleration is 1/2 to 1/3 slower and the time to reach the finial speed will be 2 to 3 times longer. So the pilot has to hold it steady and in balance 2 to 3 times longer than Richard Jenkins did and they will have to travel at least 2 to 3 times the distance.
Here is a speed chart of the greenbird record:
View attachment 531522
View attachment 531523
Some note from a Wired article (https://www.wired.com/2008/08/wind-powered-ra/)
- 110 deg from the nose is the fastest point of sail. This is actually about the same for all sailboats, independent of speed.
- depending on the surface traction, we can achieve ratios of up to 5 times the true wind speed (on tarmac, 3-4 times on dirt/salt), meaning an apparent wind angle of around 12 deg to the nose. The angle of the wing is then at about 3-5 deg (to leeward) of the apparent wind (7-9 deg from the vehicle track).
The counter to that argument is that weight gives inertia to keep speed up through the lulls and gives you more speed before you fly the ama regardless. The slower acceleration/deceleration (especially roll speed) buys you a little more time in terms of foil control as well.I can't help but question the weight of the NZ racer. The weight doesn't affect the max speed, but it does affect the acceleration and how long the pilot has to keep everything in balance to reach that top speed.
I have not seen anything talking about using that much weight ballast. All of the reports that I read say he was very concerned about making it as light as possible. This article talks about the downward force transfer:I've heard elsewhere that while Greenbird, as a completed land yacht, was approx 600kg, It was actually running a lot more weight for the record and was capable of being loaded up as needed. I think I remember it being 1,800kg, but not sure. Has anyone else heard, seen, or read the same?
1000kg side force x heeling arm (HA) has to be balanced by 600 kg x righting arm (RA).Greenbird only weighs 600kg but at high speeds it is transferring up to one tonne of side force into the ground
You’re suggesting the saltier the water the faster it will dry? Cool.It must be BAU for the water to pool in that corner then, as the thicker water, must deposit more salt, and this has been repeating for hundreds of years, so maybe this pooling is nature's final stage before a big dry out.
Salt water evaporates much slower than fresh water. The salt acts as a humectant and holds onto the water longer.You’re suggesting the saltier the water the faster it will dry? Cool.
I hope the salt makes for a better surface too.
No, I was suggesting it must be normal for the water to pool in that corner, that area of the lake has much thicker salt than the rest of the lake, so it must frequently have more water sitting and drying there than other areas. Nothing to do with dry time.You’re suggesting the saltier the water the faster it will dry? Cool.
I hope the salt makes for a better surface too.
well it's september now. let's see.It sounds possible that within a month it will be dry, coinciding with the Sept wind. Fingers crossed, would be cool!
The salt crystal Glenn showed was a bit of a monster though, hopefully that situation improves somehow too.
Clouds gives his weather update on the "dry" lake.