Jesus you dumbfuck. Are you still on Mueller?“In Mueller's opening statement that came later before the House Intelligence Committee, the former special counsel said he wanted to "correct the record" on his exchange with Lieu.
"That's not the correct way to say it," Mueller said. "We did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime."
Mueller clarifies comments on whether he could indict Trump (nbcnews.com)
OFGS...What a fucked (deliberately) up question, actually there are two questions there so there is at least ambiguity as to which he was answering. There is however no ambiguity here ... "We did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.""Based on Justice Department policy and principles of fairness, we decided we would not make a determination as to whether the President committed a crime. That was our decision then and it remains our decision today."
Where might one find such a policy?
Earlier, during the Judiciary hearing, Republican Rep. Ken Buck of Colorado also asked Mueller about charging Trump.
"Was there sufficient evidence to convict President Trump or anyone else with obstruction of justice?" Buck asked.
"We did not make that calculation," Mueller said, citing the OLC opinion.
Buck later asked, "Could you charge a president with a crime after he left office?"
"Yes," Mueller replied.
"You believe that he committed — you could charge the President of the United States with obstruction of justice after he left office?" Buck continued.
"Yes," Mueller answered.
He answered specific to the person, not to "a President", meaning the office.
This is getting weirder. How do you think you will react when your god is indicted?OFGS...What a fucked (deliberately) up question, actually there are two questions there so there is at least ambiguity as to which he was answering. There is however no ambiguity here ... "We did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime."
Nevermind that. You need to give yourself a couple of brisk slaps on the face and figure out how you are going to defend the new inventory list which shows folders labeled classified that have been emptied of their contents. You should note that trumps lawyers have never stated to any court that he declassified documents.
Trump being a career criminal and in light of what's transpired since it is quite easy to see that Mueller concluded that Trump committed a crime, but didn't have the authority to do anything about it. Remember who the AG was. Mueller was quite clear about Trump being a criminal. Everyone he is associated with is a criminal and many of them have been convicted in a court of law. What is your attraction to such a person? He's not even physically attractive or intentionally funny. Why do you worship such a person?
If the previous posts around the signing out and in of docs are correct then they will know by process of elimination what is still in the wind.Well this is getting awkward, 43 classified folders with missing contents kinda blows the overdue library books RW arguement completely.
The bullshit spin is getting harder and harder, its so unfair.
Lots of the best people will be getting very nervous, good.
Obstruction is a crime. Will you admit that?
What else is/was the storage room used for, would employees of whatever company runs maintenance of the hotel have had regular access? And who was vacuuming that garish carpet shown in the photo?27 empty folders
and the lovely russian speaking beautiful golf swing chick from "rothschild family " has been hanging around
fek - the brit MI5 MI6 people must be shitting bricks
naughty, naughty sloppy Mercans