Speaking of storms over Mar-A-Lago look at what was brewing thanks to Ian over West Palm today!
Helps explain where all the missing TS docs went!
Speaking of storms over Mar-A-Lago look at what was brewing thanks to Ian over West Palm today!
Looks like a tornado to me.Helps explain where all the missing TS docs went!
Looks like the loser guy farting out a half dozen hamberders to me.Looks like a tornado to me.
Get away from the high end Waterfront and just a few blocks from the business strips, and there are some very low rent areas of West Palm. Someone has to wait tables, clean houses of the wealthy, etc.No way there that many low rent cars in West Palm. That's a fake video!
I thought those were the Eastern European H-2B and brownish H-2A people.... They don't need that many houses, do they?Get away from the high end Waterfront and just a few blocks from the business strips, and there are some very low rent areas of West Palm. Someone has to wait tables, clean houses of the wealthy, etc.
Ah, OK, got it. American legalese has always confounded me - I worked in a plain English jurisdiction and would never have been allowed to use such an artifice.In this case, the client was an entity.
"You", "Client", and "Company" are used interchangeably herein
If the US civil legal system was a church, artifice would be its prayers.Ah, OK, got it. American legalese has always confounded me - I worked in a plain English jurisdiction and would never have been allowed to use such an artifice.
That's what it's for.American legalese has always confounded me
Rule: You may not criticize until after you diagram the sentencegoode try, butte to easey to udderstande
leagallease is verrey dense..... no roome foire interpertatione
Ah, OK, got it. American legalese has always confounded me - I worked in a plain English jurisdiction and would never have been allowed to use such an artifice.
Of course he is. Something to do with not being able to shovel his bullshit in a court of law.
Trump pushing back on special master’s request for him to declare in court whether DOJ inventory is accurate