Thanks for clarifying that Sol. If the 11th circuit ruling is moot, then doesn't this by extension make TFG's appeal to the SCOTUS moot? Or Have I missed something else in the details?
FBI storms Mar a Lago
- Thread starter Fakenews
- Start date
phill_nz
Super Anarchist
if mem serves
they lost book 3 ( ye of the shinning golden tablet )
and had to go to a similar but not identical book 4 ( luckily also of the shinning golden tablet)
Mike G
Super Anarchist
Ruh Roh...
Sol Rosenberg
Girthy Member
Clove Hitch
Halyard licker
Fucking hell. Trump is winning the war by stalling. Got to make sure he has time to work on the witnesses
Sol Rosenberg
Girthy Member
No he isn’t. That is lightning speed for an appeal, with no extensions allowed. That’s unreal.
This is an appeal from the US, isn't it?
My front door directly faces the front door of the 11th Circuit. My son worked there as a law student. I don't agree with much of what they decide. The fact that those folks haven't bent over for the little don means a lot.
Mark_K
Super Anarchist
Can't think of any witnesses in this he can work on. If he tries that with an FBI agent he's gonna regret it anyway.
He bought himself a month, six weeks or so...he was surely hoping for more than that. Probably imagined this would get him a year. It may be dawning on him that, as Dorothy would put it: "We aren't in NYC real estate anymore."
Voyageur
Super Anarchist
SloopJonB
Super Anarchist
Sol Rosenberg
Girthy Member
These pros keep getting the language wrong. The FBI didn’t seize documents from Mar a Lago. They recovered stolen US government property. Calling it “seizing” implies that the Pride of New York owns them. He doesn’t. He didn’t.
Voyageur
Super Anarchist
Drip, drip, drip.... There are apparently, fireplaces in the WH. We have heard stories about clogged toilets. Documents have been destroyed. What was the purpose of the documents that were hidden at Mar-La-Gogo?
Another fine example of the Pride of New York spinning the narrative to up the outrage and increase the return on the grift.
Fakenews
Super Anarchist
- 13,839
- 1,895
- Thread starter
- #6,396
Well some one noticed. In his filing Trump attorneys claims he “possessed“ the records. That’s a crime.
Trump lawyers ‘stepped in it’ on page 30 of his SCOTUS appeal: analysis
Donald Trump's legal team "stepped in it" with its use of a key term in its appeal to the United States Supreme Court.MSNBC anchor Lawrence O'Donnell on Tuesday evening directed his audience to a single word in the 37-page filing."In their appeal today, the Trump lawyers still offered absolutely...
www.rawstory.com
In their appeal today, the Trump lawyers still offered absolutely no reason why Donald Trump would be entitled to these documents and they made the mistake of using a word that they have not used before," O'Donnell said. "In describing Donald Trump's relationship to these documents, after saying in their Supreme Court appeal tonight, once again, that this case is, 'essentially a document storage dispute,' the Trump lawyers, on page 30, went on to say the 'government has sought to criminalize President Trump's possession and management of his own personal and presidential records.'"
"Possession of those records is a crime," O'Donnell noted.
from there, Joe DeGenova.... Here's hoping that both this bastard and his wife go down hard in all of this, been waiting to see that name.
New: Sealed list of docs seized from Mar-a-Lago that DOJ determined to be potentially privileged was made public due to a docketing error spotted by
@ZoeTillman
— includes items on National Archives, Mueller, Joe DoGenova, Pat Cipollone
SloopJonB
Super Anarchist
Are these accidents or are they fucking with TFG?Well some one noticed. In his filing Trump attorneys claims he “possessed“ the records. That’s a crime.
Trump lawyers ‘stepped in it’ on page 30 of his SCOTUS appeal: analysis
Donald Trump's legal team "stepped in it" with its use of a key term in its appeal to the United States Supreme Court.MSNBC anchor Lawrence O'Donnell on Tuesday evening directed his audience to a single word in the 37-page filing."In their appeal today, the Trump lawyers still offered absolutely...
In their appeal today, the Trump lawyers still offered absolutely no reason why Donald Trump would be entitled to these documents and they made the mistake of using a word that they have not used before," O'Donnell said. "In describing Donald Trump's relationship to these documents, after saying in their Supreme Court appeal tonight, once again, that this case is, 'essentially a document storage dispute,' the Trump lawyers, on page 30, went on to say the 'government has sought to criminalize President Trump's possession and management of his own personal and presidential records.'"
"Possession of those records is a crime," O'Donnell noted.
There seems to be a substantial amount of incompetence going on if it's all accidents.
billy backstay
Backstay, never bought a suit, never went to Vegas
Well some one noticed. In his filing Trump attorneys claims he “possessed“ the records. That’s a crime.
Trump lawyers ‘stepped in it’ on page 30 of his SCOTUS appeal: analysis
Donald Trump's legal team "stepped in it" with its use of a key term in its appeal to the United States Supreme Court.MSNBC anchor Lawrence O'Donnell on Tuesday evening directed his audience to a single word in the 37-page filing."In their appeal today, the Trump lawyers still offered absolutely...
In their appeal today, the Trump lawyers still offered absolutely no reason why Donald Trump would be entitled to these documents and they made the mistake of using a word that they have not used before," O'Donnell said. "In describing Donald Trump's relationship to these documents, after saying in their Supreme Court appeal tonight, once again, that this case is, 'essentially a document storage dispute,' the Trump lawyers, on page 30, went on to say the 'government has sought to criminalize President Trump's possession and management of his own personal and presidential records.'"
"Possession of those records is a crime," O'Donnell noted.
I won't believe any of this shit means anything until Trump is actually charged with a crime! If the Constitution Article 14-3 is meaningless then so could all of this be? I am so sick and tired of NO JUSTICE, that it will not surprise me one bit if Trump walks away Scott Free when all is said and done.......
El Borracho
Verified User
Yes. Fundamental to entrenched power structures is that they protect their own kind. D’s, R’s, justices, legislators, presidents and their sycophants all follow that unwritten rule. I think that the protection of the system takes unconscious priority over even policy and party. Even Bernie, maybe?I won't believe any of this shit means anything until Trump is actually charged with a crime! If the Constitution Article 14-3 is meaningless then so could all of this be? I am so sick and tired of NO JUSTICE, that it will not surprise me one bit if Trump walks away Scott Free when all is said and done.......
