Marty Gingras
Mid-range Anarchist
Anti-Trumpers of most stripes (yours included) are OK by me.Like the 8 swing states did ?
When they violated the Constitution and local politicians changed voting laws?
2020
Anti-Trumpers of most stripes (yours included) are OK by me.Like the 8 swing states did ?
When they violated the Constitution and local politicians changed voting laws?
2020
Of course it did!1- prostitution is illegal
2- extortion is illegal
3- the money came from political campaign funds
#3 is the biggest crime, we have election laws for a reason and breaking them should be taken very seriously.
Yeah, that would be terrible & awful & very bad, if it actually happened.
Which it didn't.
It hurt the people of NYC by being swept under the rug, and potentially allowed TFG to win the POTUS election, which has killed millions of people through ignorance, blatant lying, and incompetence, not to mention the amount of money spent guarding his fat ass and his family while they lounged around Manhattan before they skipped off to West Palm Beach to avoid taxes, and criminal charges.....In principle and most cases of criminaI agree.
But this is a how-many year-old crime of floozy-hush payment that has that has hurt the citizens of New York City how?
and you have evidence, yes?Like the 8 swing states did ?
When they violated the Constitution and local politicians changed voting laws?
2020
Is this another “process” crime? The sympathetic victims are who? And a conviction is going to benefit the victims how?
I’m no orangehead fan, but I wonder if this isn’t better left to the political process.
"However, the damage to the legal system is immense whenever political pressure overwhelms prosecutorial judgment. The criminal justice system can be a terrible weapon when used for political purposes, an all-too-familiar spectacle in countries where political foes can be targeted by the party in power." … Jonathan Turley
It is interesting that Hillary was not prosecuted criminally when she paid for the phony Steele dossier through an intermediary. If memory serves, she did pay a fine.
If it was not for double standards Democrats would have no standardsIt is interesting that Hillary was not prosecuted criminally when she paid for the phony Steele dossier through an intermediary. If memory serves, she did pay a fine.
Interesting. Capitan Ron has shown a willingness to replace elected state attorneys for saying the wrong thing, so could Dave Aronberg feel the pinch for bringing state charges against Americans in such a case? If there is an indictment of the GOP’s Most Law Abiding and Selfless Patriot, Capitan Ron is going to have to go big to have any chance in the primary.Sounds like a plan. Get them all in one place and then deal with the domestic armed terrorists as appropriate.
If only an Attorney General with a pattern of bias favoring DJT could have appointed a Special Counsel to look into this for a few years. Better yet, maybe those two could repeatedly share fine brandy and chat about the case in ways that violated the independence of the Special Counselor.It is interesting that Hillary was not prosecuted criminally when she paid for the phony Steele dossier through an intermediary. If memory serves, she did pay a fine.
The agency described it as a clerical error. It was a settlement entered into by the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign. Both are quite a bit different than what’s going on with Trump.It is interesting that Hillary was not prosecuted criminally when she paid for the phony Steele dossier through an intermediary. If memory serves, she did pay a fine.
“Clerical error”The agency described it as a clerical error. It was a settlement entered into by the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign. Both are quite a bit different than what’s going on with Trump.
The agency described it as a clerical error. It was a settlement entered into by the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign. Both are quite a bit different than what’s going on with Trump.It is interesting that Hillary was not prosecuted criminally when she paid for the phony Steele dossier through an intermediary. If memory serves, she did pay a fine.
That’s only what “Actually” happened. That doesn’t matter nearly as much as what bullshitters believe happened.If only an Attorney General with a pattern of bias favoring DJT could have appointed a Special Counsel to look into this for a few years. Better yet, maybe those two could repeatedly share fine brandy and chat about the case in ways that violated the independence of the Special Counselor.
That politically motivated “investigation” should ideally have displayed such zeal to reach a conclusion that career prosecutors under the Special Counsellor’s leadership quit in protest of his decisions which violated their ethical and professional standards.
Oh wait. That happened.
And they still couldn’t weaponize the DOJ effectively to prosecute anyone close to Hillary. How sad for you America haters 😢
The Gateway Pundit has universal jurisdiction. I think that was part of Hammurabi’s code.
The subject was a complaint against the DNC and the Clinton campaign. Hillary Clinton was not singled out. Both the Party and the Campaign maintained that they followed the law but paid the fine to conclude the complaint by the FEC. Clinton paid $8,000.It is interesting that Hillary was not prosecuted criminally when she paid for the phony Steele dossier through an intermediary. If memory serves, she did pay a fine.