SloopJonB
Super Anarchist
I guess that answers the first question I had when I first heard about it;* besides for all that, the real purpose always seemed like a way for dope dealers and hit men to get paid![]()
Why?
What purpose does it serve?
I guess that answers the first question I had when I first heard about it;* besides for all that, the real purpose always seemed like a way for dope dealers and hit men to get paid![]()
Money is a medium for transactions and a store of value. Crypto fails utterly on both counts.
Anything that worked as money would not be an investment, wild swings in value either way do NOT make for good money, never mind the ephemeral and faddish nature of crypto.
* besides for all that, the real purpose always seemed like a way for dope dealers and hit men to get paid![]()
It is exchangeable for currency, there's just significantly less liquidity and more volatility than most fiat currencies. In that sense it's like trading foreign currencies. Price stability could be improved with more trading volume and more efficient market structures, but bitcoin isn't well suited to either of those developments.Yes, an open source ledger system for tracking say trade across the supply chain could be useful.
If bitcoin isn’t fungible to hard currency, what’s the point? Until I can pay my taxes with it, it’s not what could be considered money in any sense. And asset based money has this little problem of massive inflation/deflation unless the govt pegs a value for, you guessed it, paying taxes.
Yes, an open source ledger system for tracking say trade across the supply chain could be useful.
For future reference, all currencies are "Fiat" currencies. Nixon ended convertibility half a century ago.most fiat currencies.
For future reference, when discussing whether crypto can qualify as currency and what that might look like, no. I trust you understood the distinction made and are just being obtuse. Please feel free to insert "non convertible government backed currency" to your heart's content.For future reference, all currencies are "Fiat" currencies. Nixon ended convertibility half a century ago.
Using that term in any discussion of economics simply labels you as a right wing fanatic.
The proper term for it is "currency"
Long story short:I could never understand crypto. There is a NOVA episode that explains it, and my eyes and brain glazed over after 10 minutes; will have to try again. Maybe if I hadn't stopped drinking alcohol it might make sense??
Long story short:
Bitcoin uses the product of solving a complex equation as "money". The way it works is every coin is a bit harder to create than the one before and there is a finite limit to them.
Why the fuck anyone though this could be money is utterly beyond me.
It requires a mass hysteria where everyone decided this is the next big thing and "q-57-w9678234912-2254789w9086!!456679867096" is worth $100. It all works great until it doesn't and someone realizes they just sold their car for a computer file no one cares about anymore.
Long story short:
Bitcoin uses the product of solving a complex equation as "money". The way it works is every coin is a bit harder to create than the one before and there is a finite limit to them.
Why the fuck anyone though this could be money is utterly beyond me.
It requires a mass hysteria where everyone decided this is the next big thing and "q-57-w9678234912-2254789w9086!!456679867096" is worth $100. It all works great until it doesn't and someone realizes they just sold their car for a computer file no one cares about anymore.
I would agree to that, I would also agree that crypto currency would be as accurately termed "non convertible non government backed currency."For future reference, when discussing whether crypto can qualify as currency and what that might look like, no. I trust you understood the distinction made and are just being obtuse. Please feel free to insert "non convertible government backed currency" to your heart's content.
That's not how Bitcoin works.Long story short:
Bitcoin uses the product of solving a complex equation as "money". The way it works is every coin is a bit harder to create than the one before and there is a finite limit to them.
Why the fuck anyone though this could be money is utterly beyond me.
It requires a mass hysteria where everyone decided this is the next big thing and "q-57-w9678234912-2254789w9086!!456679867096" is worth $100. It all works great until it doesn't and someone realizes they just sold their car for a computer file no one cares about anymore.
This is what I recall:That's not how Bitcoin works.
A new token is released to the chain approximately every 1.6 minutes. The complexity of the calculations are based on the hashrates of the computers competing for the token. They don't get progressively harder with number of tokens released - they scale with hashrate.
When a bitcoin miner goes out of business, the remaining hashrate decreases and the difficult of the calculations scales down so that again, a token is still released every 1.6 minutes.
Fixed.I would agree to that, I would also agree that crypto currency would be as accurately termed "non convertible un-backed scam."
I could never understand crypto. ...
You need to start with encabulation and go from there.
Is that VVV?
You need to start with encabulation and go from there.