Greed As A Mental Disorder

Jules

Super Anarchist
10,392
4,851
Distopia SE, USA
This is from an article written in 2014:

Greed is a factor in the well-documented growing concentration of wealth in the United States. The super-rich claim to be deserving of their wealth, but it’s likely that greed—not wisdom, common sense, or concern about the common good—was a factor in the creation over the past decades of a “financialized” economy that unduly tilts the playing field in favor of those with the most capital to speculate.

Yet people don’t have to be rich to have the disorder; greed about money is all it takes. As a psychiatric diagnosis, it could be called the Great Gatsby Syndrome or, better yet, Wealth Accumulation Disorder.

Both narcissism and greed have their roots in profound self-doubt. Narcissism is self-aggrandizement of the emotional kind, while greed is self-aggrandizement of the materialistic kind. Narcissism (when it occurs as pervasive grandiosity) is listed as a mental disorder in psychiatry’s diagnostic manual. Why not greed? It should also be listed in the manual.



We probably need to stop seeing our politicians as emotionally healthy people. They are not. Same can be said for those for whom there is never enough wealth.

Once we recognize these people are emotionally unwell, we can better respond to them and, hopefully, avoid contributing to handing them the power they seek.
 

Goodvibes

under the southern cross I stand ...
3,546
1,097
I have always wondered about people who have billions, but still keep on doing the same shit that they did to get those billions.

At least Bill Gates eventually bailed ad started disbursing part of it.

About 1999, I reported to a CEO/Owner of a private company. He was pulling $60m a year and only he knew what he had accumulated. But while talking about how good business had been I asked him ...

Me: "So, what the fuck are you still doing here Bob?"

Bob: "Well, I don't know what else I would do."

He steamed on till just a few years ago after selling it all to an Asian outfit.
 
Last edited:

Goodvibes

under the southern cross I stand ...
3,546
1,097
Hmmm.

Some research suggests there is a genetic basis for greed. It is possible people who have a shorter version of the ruthlessness gene (AVPR1a) may behave more selfishly.


Maybe, or it might be this ... we all cannot help ourselves.

The lack of Free Will means that, Cambridge Analytica identifed people who, if presented with just the right information, would defineately vote for Trump.

Or, if certain predictable people are presented with an investment opportunity, they certainly would take it. That's how rich people take money from poor people. Think gambling ads.

 
Last edited:

Dog 2.0

Super Anarchist
6,232
1,201
A thought experiment ... Would average Americans be better off or worse off if instead of one Bill Gates we had a thousand? Accusations of greed always seem to contain an element of jealousy.
 

phillysailor

Super Anarchist
10,211
4,979
A thought experiment ... Would average Americans be better off or worse off if instead of one Bill Gates we had a thousand? Accusations of greed always seem to contain an element of jealousy.
If 1,000 Bill Gates meant the rest of the world was penniless by comparison?

We’d have a pure oligarchy and would be at their absolute mercy.

That doesn’t sound great to me.
 

Steam Flyer

Sophisticated Yet Humble
50,767
13,484
Eastern NC
A thought experiment ... Would average Americans be better off or worse off if instead of one Bill Gates we had a thousand? Accusations of greed always seem to contain an element of jealousy.

We'd certainly be far better off with a lot more Melindas, but I am doubtful that a thousand more stolen kludged operating systems forced onto consumers would be an improvement.
 

Dog 2.0

Super Anarchist
6,232
1,201
If 1,000 Bill Gates meant the rest of the world was penniless by comparison?

We’d have a pure oligarchy and would be at their absolute mercy.

That doesn’t sound great to me.
Oh yes, the zero-sum game fallacy. Bill Gates didn't get rich at anyone else's expense. He didn't take a big slice of the pie leaving less for everyone else. He grew the pie. Hell, even his mail room staff became rich.
 

Ease the sheet.

ignoring stupid people is easy
21,623
3,023
A thought experiment ... Would average Americans be better off or worse off if instead of one Bill Gates we had a thousand? Accusations of greed always seem to contain an element of jealousy.
Better off.

Think of all those people employed building the extra 999 mansions, boats etc.


More money in more hands means more demand.
 

deluxe68

Member
438
1
Oh yes, the zero-sum game fallacy. Bill Gates didn't get rich at anyone else's expense. He didn't take a big slice of the pie leaving less for everyone else. He grew the pie. Hell, even his mail room staff became rich.
So, by your account, the people he stole ideas from did not suffer financial loss? How about the people forced to use his browser because it was illegally packaged with other software?
 



SA Podcast

Sailing Anarchy Podcast with Scot Tempesta

Sponsored By:

Top