What is that in reference to?If PJ has the kind of money it takes to try to intimidate someone with a bullshit libel suit, there are probably some trustees, creditors, and BK judges who want to chat with him about where that cash came from.
Such a fucking rat bitch move. The kind of thing people who screw their vendors and customers over repeatedly would do.
Aren't Gunboats and Outremers all designed by VPLP and built in adjoining sheds? So it's just like Chevy and Cadillac. They could build one GB every 5 years and it wouldn't really matter.Soma said:I was going to say that a flybridge Gunboat model feels like a desperate act. Outremers are selling like hotcakes so why mess with a successful business model? The new O55 seems like a winner on the water and in the marketplace.
Launching one Gunboat per year, on the other hand, doesn’t seem sustainable. I assume 68 sales aren’t wildly outstripping the build pace, so time to recalibrate.
could not agree moreThey should go small. The 48's are like unicorns, super rare and highly desirable. GLY seems to be in a mindset of go big or go home; we'll see how that plays out for them. Going small would open up new customers to them that aren't so uber-wealthy. I hope they're successful whatever direction they go.
I think (?) Soma had a quote up that was critical of GB but it was aimed at the current ownership if I understood it correctly and not PJ.Yes, very interesting.....
I think they are unicorns because they don't economically work. By going smaller you save in materials, but most of the cost of one of these boats is labor, and you don't save that much by making the boat shorter. The systems are still there, the fit and finish work is the same, so you wouldn't have as big of a discount from a 68 as you would think to justify going with the smaller boat.They should go small. The 48's are like unicorns, super rare and highly desirable. GLY seems to be in a mindset of go big or go home; we'll see how that plays out for them. Going small would open up new customers to them that aren't so uber-wealthy. I hope they're successful whatever direction they go.
Agreed. With the evolution of the Outremer range I think the O45 is too close to what a smaller Gunboat would be if it were to fill the 'owner operator' caveat and that doesn't make sense for the GLY group (the new 68s are far more 'integrated' than the earlier models so access for servicing and maintenance of a lot of the systems is arguably trickier and likely needs more skills and time than mast OOs can muster).I think they are unicorns because they don't economically work. By going smaller you save in materials, but most of the cost of one of these boats is labor, and you don't save that much by making the boat shorter. The systems are still there, the fit and finish work is the same, so you wouldn't have as big of a discount from a 68 as you would think to justify going with the smaller boat.
I'm sure if you asked GB they would politely point you at the Outremer 45.
I think that is disingenuous, or more precisely, an uninformed statement. I can think of maybe one individual who attempted to piggyback off the PJ/GB failures....I dont consider the Holland Composites thing one of those....and I refer specifically to the Daedalus shit show.There seems to be a list of people that are ex-GB employees that have run other companies into the ground and/or left buyers high and dry. I don't mean everyone but geeze if somebody as GB experience on their CV I would be veerrryyyy careful. If I read Soma's prior post right I would think hard about the current company as well.
Not referring to Holland at all. You named one and there are more. A reborn catamaran name that was a classic…. and so on. Too many of my friends lost a lot of money to those ******.I think that is disingenuous, or more precisely, an uninformed statement. I can think of maybe one individual who attempted to piggyback off the PJ/GB failures....I dont consider the Holland Composites thing one of those....and I refer specifically to the Daedalus shit show.
Anybody around who’ve sailed an Outremer 45 and still believes it is a ‘Performance Cat’? Are all Outremer Cats still build in Polyester?I'm sure if you asked GB they would politely point you at the Outremer 45.
They built at least one 5X in carbon. Not sure of the resin, So they would probably build you a 45 in carbon. But it might be cheaper and get your a faster boat to just buy the next size up.Anybody around who’ve sailed an Outremer 45 and still believes it is a ‘Performance Cat’? Are all Outremer Cats still build in Polyester?
Agreed, especially since they did a carbon 4X for Puffin using the GB technology for the hulls. Seems like GLY and Outremer are perfectly content to let Outremer handle the sub-60’ market.I think they are unicorns because they don't economically work. By going smaller you save in materials, but most of the cost of one of these boats is labor, and you don't save that much by making the boat shorter. The systems are still there, the fit and finish work is the same, so you wouldn't have as big of a discount from a 68 as you would think to justify going with the smaller boat.
I'm sure if you asked GB they would politely point you at the Outremer 45.