Head US Opti Coach Caught Breaking the Rules at South American Champs

This week at the International Optimist South American Champs 3 US Sailors received DSQ's by the international jury from a protest by the technical committee, based on their actions and that of the USODA Team Head Coach, Fernando "Happy" Alegre, breaking multiple SI and NOR rules.

Coach Happy Alegre has been the USODA Head National Team Coach and leads many of the international regattas.

USODA has started to take some action against the coach:

Letter From USODA:
"Many of you are aware of the unfortunate events that transpired at SAMs this week involving Coach Happy. For those of you who are not, the findings of the international jury at the SAMs regatta are posted online.

Yesterday, USODA removed Happy as coach for the USA SAMs team based on the findings of the SAMs international jury and he has been replaced by Pepe Bettini.

I am writing to inform all of the USNT families that Happy is also suspended as the USNT coach effective immediately. Happy has been informed of his suspension from USNT.

Decisions regarding Happy’s future with USNT will be made after the USODA Executive Committee disciplinary hearing which will be held per our by laws and code of conduct.

We are all disappointed with the situation especially with the positive feedback from most everyone on the USNT reboot this season. But the integrity of the sport and adherence to the code of conduct that governs our sailors and coaches must come first.

We are committed to the continued success of the USNT and we will adapt to any possible future changes to ensure the reboot continues on its positive trajectory. We are looking forward to some trainings over the summer, which will be announced soon, to prepare for the summer team regattas.

I will communicate with you regarding the USNT as the Executive Committee completes its disciplinary hearing. We all appreciate your patience as USODA works through the disciplinary processes we have established to handle such situations."


JURY PROTEST REPORT:
Incident:
"I walked down the back of the hotel and I saw the USA Coach working on
an inverted Optimist. I asked the Coach what he was doing as the boat
was wet, and he denied sanding or polishing the boat when I asked. I went
to the Boat Park with Ale Williman to look at the other USA boats and there
were only 9 boats in the Boat Park. We returned to the back of hotel area
and we noticed a tub of polish beside the boat. The boat was still there but
the Coach was gone. We called Sigrid Beckmann and looked in the
window of the shed and saw 2 USA Optimists inverted inside and a strong
smell of polish. The coach returned; we got access to the shed; and
noticed a residue on the top of the boats that transferred to my hand and a
residue on the ground directly below. At no time did the Coach request
permission to remove boats from the boat park or repair, sand or polish
any part of the boat since all USA Optimists have completed
measurement"


Facts Found:
"All boats of team USA had gone through event measurement by 5pm on 15th
April. In the afternoon of 16th April, the three protested boats were removed
from the boat park by the sailors and their coach and carried to the area
around their equipment shed. Two of the boats were placed inside the shed
and the third one was left outside.
While the boats were at this location, the coach proceeded to remove the
centreboard rubber stoppers in order to replace them with new ones. No
permission had been requested from the Technical Committee to carry out
this replacement of equipment or for removing the boats from the boat park.
At 6pm on 16th April, the chair of the Technical Committee inspected the
three boats at their location inside or next to the shed. She found a bin
containing polish and a wet piece of cloth with traces of the substance. A
residue of the polish transferred from the bottom surface of the three hulls
onto her hand."


Conclusion:
"The boats were removed from the boat park without permission of the
Technical Committee, infringing NOR 9.12.
The substitution of the centreboard rubber stoppers was carried out without
permission from the Technical Committee, infringing NOR 9.3.
The bottom surface of the hulls was cleaned using a substance other than
water, infringing NOR 9.12 and SI 5.4. The boats certainly obtained a
competitive advantage through this breach."


Jury Decision:
"Using the World Sailing Discretionary Penalty Guide, a penalty of DSQ was
decided for the most serious breach which was that of SI 5.4 and the second
sentence of NOR 9.12. The penalty is applied to Race 1."


Applicable Rules:
NOR 9.3, NOR 9.12, SI 5.4

Link to Protest Findings:

Event Link:

At the most basic part, you have the head coach for the US Opti Sailing in the US teaching and guiding young sailors in bad behavior. Teach them to win at any cost is all that is wrong with the sport. Unfortunately here it's being taught at the youngest level by the head coach of the USODA. That has the risk to trickle down to all others in the sport. Beyond the infringement itself, its the optics that is pushed to "win at all costs" driven by this coach.

I'm surprised that only one race was listed as a DSQ. The sailors then used that as their throw out. I would think a breach like the above incident would make the score unable to be excluded.

What punishment should USODA give this coach?
Lifetime ban from coaching the national team and international events for USODA?
A ban from coaching at any USODA events for a certain time period?
Has this coach had issues like this before?
Should US Sailing being involved and a Rule 69 hearing take place?
Should the sailors have any additional punishment, they helped carry the boats or is the DSQ in the one race enough?

No matter what it makes the United States sailors on an international level look like a bunch of cheaters, the optics are terrible for the sport and USODA.
 

crashtack

Anarchist
547
421
lol, what a farce. Speaking as someone who's been to a lot of international opti events, the only story here is that someone got caught doing it.
Used to be that if you took a walk through the boat park at night before or during an ioda event, even Worlds, you would see people "working on" inverted optis. Non team personnel, of course. The singaporeans, when they were winning everything ~10 years ago used to be notorious for this (guess who their coach was at the time?)
Anyways, while I'm not trying to justify it as being morally ok, this was pretty par for the course. It was fairly widespread and it was sort of understood that it couldn't really be enforced. Happy just happened to get caught by the wrong person at the wrong time, and now will be made an example of it seems.
I know him personally - he's a good guy and a very, very good coach - and while what he did is wrong and sets a bad example, I don't believe he deserves a lifetime ban.

As usual people on SA are undoubtedly going to make a bigger deal out of this than it really is. Though its no excuse, there has always been NASCAR-type "cheating" going on at opti events (lets be honest, in sailing in general). While its good that rules are getting enforced, this is simply what happens when you mix a very high level of competition and poorly-enforcable rules that probably shouldnt even exist in the first place (a bottle of polish and a rag cost maybe $40 and can do 10 optis, what is the point of this rule?)
Should the j70 crews that fair their keels and flip winches upside down receive a lifetime ban? Should the dude with the garmin watch in a non-electronics class be not allowed to race ever again? The guy with lead in his lifejacket at an etchells event? To me, no.
 
Last edited:

BayRacer

Anarchist
638
103
Why are there USA entries in the South American champs? They US class should revoke his access to the group/venue, although I suppose that brings up concerns with chaperone coverage for youngsters. Definitely should ban the coach through the normal due process channels. Maybe the class can refuse to reimburse his travel expenses since he failed his coaching role. Or leave him in Peru when the team leaves.......
 
2,512
379
USA
The coach was foolish but a lifetime ban is far far too harsh for this minor violation.

As an aside, USA has had what, 1 podium finish in opti worlds in the last 50 years?
Cheating is never ok, but a certain level of desperation is expected.
 

crashtack

Anarchist
547
421
Oh, and about the US looking like a bunch of cheaters? In a class that has a long, long history of [certain countries] doing things like team racing in a fleet race to help a teammate win, abusing rule 42, committing professional fouls, and lodging false protests (to name just a few) - this is a nothingburger.
 

Howler

Animal control officer
424
422
The coach was foolish but a lifetime ban is far far too harsh for this minor violation.

As an aside, USA has had what, 1 podium finish in opti worlds in the last 50 years?
Cheating is never ok, but a certain level of desperation is expected.
A "minor violation" might be, for example, replacing a boom that broke or replacing a rudder that a sailor lost overboard without telling the measurement committee that you had done so, both of which are technical violations but neither of which has the intent or effect of gaining advantage.

This, on the other hand, was deliberate, willful cheating and, presumably, teaching students that deliberate, willful cheating is the thing to do. That fucker shouldn't be allowed near kids or a race course ever again.
 

Howler

Animal control officer
424
422
Should the j70 crews that fair their keels and flip winches upside down receive a lifetime ban?
Did they do so, knowing that they were deliberately violating a rule to gain unfair advantage?
Should the dude with the garmin watch in a non-electronics class be not allowed to race ever again?
Did he wear it knowing that it was banned?
The guy with lead in his lifejacket at an etchells event?
That one kind of speaks for itself.

Cheaters suck as human beings and they should be kept as far as possible away from the rest of us.
 

fboats

Member
112
63
A little polish on a boat bottom? Seems like not such a big deal. Its not like he put a cheater rudder on or something? Excuse my ignorance of Opti rules, but can one not wax the bottom of one?
 

Howler

Animal control officer
424
422
A little polish on a boat bottom? Seems like not such a big deal. Its not like he put a cheater rudder on or something? Excuse my ignorance of Opti rules, but can one not wax the bottom of one?
You can polish the boat all you want before the regatta. During the regatta, you aren't allowed to replace any part of the boat after the measurer has reviewed it, or clean the bottom with anything other than water.
 

fboats

Member
112
63
You can polish the boat all you want before the regatta. During the regatta, you aren't allowed to replace any part of the boat after the measurer has reviewed it, or clean the bottom with anything other than water.
Had the regatta actually started? Maybe the coach simply ran out of time to get the road grime off and was playing catch up while herding a bunch of little runts for well off parents.

If this is USA cheating, it is a pretty weak standard compared to Aussie and Kiwi level stuff.
 

Goodvibes

under the southern cross I stand ...
2,283
785
lol, what a farce. Speaking as someone who's been to a lot of international opti events, the only story here is that someone got caught doing it.

My exact thoughts on reading it.

Not just Opti's. Sailing in general is probably the most cheat-ridden sport I have been involved in. The reason that more people don't get penalised is that "everyone is doing it"!

Those who do the right thing and protest the cheating cunts, can find themselves with very few friends.

I no longer compete as a personal protest. Fuck the cheating cunts.
 

Virgulino Ferreira

Super Anarchist
1,843
1,794
Brazil
Whoa, Paracas, looks like a fantastic and epic place!

e948a7c347ca0cdeb5433fc1e936054f_photo_750x1000.JPG


4f6537663f76d2db65952c06da97a02d_photo_750x1000.JPG


bdebebbef1e3546d2f22241ca7236767_photo_750x1000.JPG


a76a8449e526aa9373482753a31be320_photo_750x1000.JPG


56985ead39275843061d0cdd6802f719_photo_750x1000.JPG


903a97bfa58b822b0a4a7ff71c656ae0_photo_750x1000.JPG



I am very sorry for these children. They are unequivocally the victims of the coach. I hope they receive good support and that they take a positive life lesson from this, even if painful.

6c9240b9aa5fa058370a87159a2ef819_photo_750x1000.JPG


This region of Paracas was home to the ancient Paracas civilization. I am not an archaeologist, but I am pretty sure that this was a Paracas cheater:

andean-civilizations-paracas-culture-452.jpg
 

crashtack

Anarchist
547
421
A "minor violation" might be, for example, replacing a boom that broke or replacing a rudder that a sailor lost overboard without telling the measurement committee that you had done so, both of which are technical violations but neither of which has the intent or effect of gaining advantage.

This, on the other hand, was deliberate, willful cheating and, presumably, teaching students that deliberate, willful cheating is the thing to do. That fucker shouldn't be allowed near kids or a race course ever again.
Did they do so, knowing that they were deliberately violating a rule to gain unfair advantage?

Did he wear it knowing that it was banned?

That one kind of speaks for itself.

Cheaters suck as human beings and they should be kept as far as possible away from the rest of us.
I can appreciate the idealism, but as in most things in life, there is nuance to this. Not exactly fair to paint someone who polished a bottom and someone who, say, pulled a drain plug out of a competitor's boat with the same brush.
 
2,512
379
USA
I can appreciate the idealism, but as in most things in life, there is nuance to this. Not exactly fair to paint someone who polished a bottom and someone who, say, pulled a drain plug out of a competitor's boat with the same brush.
yep.

Howler--
"shouldnt be allowed near kids" WTF is wrong with you? So if the coach has children they should be taken away and sent to foster care?

Did you get your ass kicked in optis as a kid, just curious? or stuffed into a locker in middle school by an opti sailor? get some help.
 

fboats

Member
112
63
I can appreciate the idealism, but as in most things in life, there is nuance to this. Not exactly fair to paint someone who polished a bottom and someone who, say, pulled a drain plug out of a competitor's boat with the same brush.
McLube is surely a high value commodity in South America. Likely some locals of privilege were just a bit arsed of the gringo privilege!
 
Top