Sol Rosenberg
Girthy Member
Post 1 in this thread is a classic. Kmac the clown posted his real thoughts on Citizens United before getting The Party line and woob woob woob, about FACE!
Pertinacious Tom
Importunate Member
Huh. I didn't know that lmgtfy would not work with a site-specific query.
I was trying to reproduce this result for you.
Not sure why the number is lower today. Still hundreds of articles if you had wanted to search for them.
Your post and my reply were about Citizens United. This thread is about Citizens United.
Do you think posts and replies about CU are more relevant in a CU thread or in a thread about how Gavin Newsom finally figured out that Justice Thomas was right about eminent domain buybacks and negro removal?
Seemed to me that CU posts were more related to CU than to eminent domain buybacks. Tell me how your post was relevant to eminent domain buybacks?
Pertinacious Tom
Importunate Member
OK, here's an easy question. Which part(s)?
Reversed in part, affirmed in part, and remanded.
Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Scalia and Alito, JJ., joined, in which Thomas, J., joined as to all but Part IV, and in which Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined as to Part IV. Roberts, C. J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Alito, J., joined. Scalia, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Alito, J., joined, and in which Thomas, J., joined in part. Stevens, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Ginsburg, Breyer , and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
