Hunter Biden's Laptop

[Dog 2.0]

Big deal alert!!! Break out the red siren emoji!

We've got to investigate this person "who's family was taking money from foreign entities..."

Oh, wait, you don't mean Trump? Really?

Imagine if Trump Inc. collected millions from a CCP related business for no apparent reason and then Donald Trump allowed a Chinese spy balloon for float over American military installations.

 

[Steam Flyer]

Imagine if Trump Inc. collected millions from a CCP related business for no apparent reason and then Donald Trump allowed a Chinese spy balloon for float over American military installations.

Why would we imagine that? It actually happened.

 

[Dex Sawash]

Imagine if Trump Inc. collected millions from a CCP related business for no apparent reason and then Donald Trump allowed a Chinese spy balloon for float over American military installations.

 

[Sol Rosenberg]

Indictments are coming. Bullshitters are going to need to raise the SPM (strokes per minute) next week, to keep from discussing reality. Stock up on lube, bullshitters.

 

[phillysailor]

No, the laptop went to the FBI. Copies of the data were circulated and some of it has been verified by a variety of media outlets.

So @Dog 2.0 admits again he:

1. Doesn’t know what crime the Bidens committed with any specificity
2. Doesn’t know that Hunter owned the laptop Isaacs had
3. Doesn’t know if all the data on the laptop is legitimate, since only some has been verified

But he’s still convinced that the president is the head of a crime family and needs to be investigated by politicians looking to weaponize government while holding hearings about how the government should not be weaponized.

In other words, he’s a god fearing Republican who hates America.

 

[phillysailor]

Imagine if Trump Inc. collected millions from a CCP related business for no apparent reason and then Donald Trump allowed a Chinese spy balloon for float over American military installations.

Well, we know the Trump family was doing business with China the entire time he was in office, and receiving lovely gifts in the form of valuable trademarks for his daughter’s wares while creating our China policy among other emoluments.

His corporation bought and sold properties in China before and while he was president, as well as in Taiwan.

“And then, lo and behold, China’s approval of one of Trump’s trademark applications became official—coincidentally only a few days after Trump reversed his previous position and endorsed the “one China” policy. This policy effectively recognizes the People’s Republic of China as the legitimate government of the mainland territory while allowing the U.S. government to have unofficial relations with Taiwan, governed by the Republic of China. In March 2017, China granted preliminary approval for 38 additional Trump trademarks, applications for which had been submitted in April 2016.”

After decades of submitting 130 applications, suddenly Trump gets 38 passed after making Beijing happy.

Oh, and there’s millions in rent payments from China to Trump.

But I’m sure @Dog 2.0 doesn’t have a problem with all that activity🙄

And I seem to remember Trump positively GUSHING about Xi as the Coronavirus spread across our nation before he started calling it the “China flu”. DJT has never been known for more than transactional loyalty, so we can fill in the blanks.

So while our doggy whines about HBL, let’s remember who took presidential corruption to new heights with his lapdog’s full approval and support.

What a bitch.

 

[tybee]

as doggie and several other RWNJs have been told repeatedly, without chain of custody (provenance), there is nothing that can be assigned to anyone that may and or may not have had possession of said laptop at any partiular time. nothing. hence the FBI has looked at it but has declined to delve into a "who dunnit" over "what if" scenarios.

 

[Ishmael]

The FBI should just say they need a sample of everyone's DNA. Watch them scatter.

 

[Blue Crab]

They can just scrape one of Dog's turds. 16 pages of them.

 

[longy]

There you go again, bothered about a few million dollars.
JARED GOT TWO BILLION DOLLARS FROM THE SAUDIS!

 

[Dog 2.0]

BTW ... Hunter is on record stating that he doesn't know if the laptop Isaacs gave to the FBI is his

as doggie and several other RWNJs have been told repeatedly, without chain of custody (provenance), there is nothing that can be assigned to anyone that may and or may not have had possession of said laptop at any partiular time. nothing. hence the FBI has looked at it but has declined to delve into a "who dunnit" over "what if" scenarios.

The chain of custody for the laptop is Isaacs to the FBI. And now Hunter has sued Isaacs in what amounts to an admission that the laptop is his.

 

[Dog 2.0]

So @Dog 2.0 admits again he:

1. Doesn’t know what crime the Bidens committed with any specificity
2. Doesn’t know that Hunter owned the laptop Isaacs had
3. Doesn’t know if all the data on the laptop is legitimate, since only some has been verified

But he’s still convinced that the president is the head of a crime family and needs to be investigated by politicians looking to weaponize government while holding hearings about how the government should not be weaponized.

In other words, he’s a god fearing Republican who hates America.

Do you still question whether the laptop is Hunter's and that it came from Isaac's shop?

 

[El Borracho]

Do you still question whether the laptop is Hunter's and that it came from Isaac's shop?

The new counter suit is silent on whether any particular laptop, or corrupted version thereof, ever belonged to Hunter. What Hunter’s action does say is he is owed damages for the theft of his valuable dick pics that you are wanking to.

 

[Dog 2.0]

The new counter suit is silent on whether any particular laptop, or corrupted version thereof, ever belonged to Hunter. What Hunter’s action does say is he is owed damages for the theft of his valuable dick pics that you are wanking to.

And the defendant in Hunter's suit is Isaacs, a working Joe who ran a computer repair business in Wilmington DE. But you're free to believe Isaacs never had a laptop belonging to Hunter if you want.

 

[El Borracho]

And the defendant in Hunter's suit is Isaacs, a working Joe who ran a computer repair business in Wilmington DE. But you're free to believe Isaacs never had a laptop belonging to Hunter if you want.

Is it important to the fever swamp whether any particular laptop was Hunter’s? Seems like the indictment and prosecution of The Biden Crime Family for [list felonies here] could proceed without that small detail, yes?

 

[Steam Flyer]

BTW ... Hunter is on record stating that he doesn't know if the laptop Isaacs gave to the FBI is his

The chain of custody for the laptop is Isaacs to the FBI. And now Hunter has sued Isaacs in what amounts to an admission that the laptop is his.

So, how did Guiliani get it? How did Bannon get it?

How did -I- get it??

 

[phillysailor]

BTW ... Hunter is on record stating that he doesn't know if the laptop Isaacs gave to the FBI is his

The chain of custody for the laptop is Isaacs to the FBI. And now Hunter has sued Isaacs in what amounts to an admission that the laptop is his.

Do you still question whether the laptop is Hunter's and that it came from Isaac's shop?

Seems even Hunter doesn’t know the answer.

But you do because…

Wait. How DO you know the laptop belonged to Hunter other than a he said/he said?

 

[Dog 2.0]

So, how did Guiliani get it? How did Bannon get it?

View attachment 580851


How did -I- get it??

Isaacs sent him a copy.

 

[Dog 2.0]

Seems even Hunter doesn’t know the answer.

But you do because…

Wait. How DO you know the laptop belonged to Hunter other than a he said/he said?

Or Hunter was lying when he said he didn't know if the laptop was his. Which of course he was, as is now evident form his lawsuit.

BTW ... How are you coming with a cite for you claim that Isaacs altered the data?

 

[Steam Flyer]

Or Hunter was lying when he said he didn't know if the laptop was his. Which of course he was, as is now evident form his lawsuit.

BTW ... How are you coming with a cite for you claim that Isaacs altered the data?

Still struggling with the part where there is an actual crime?