Hunter Biden's Laptops

[badlatitude]

Does she have any evidence that he "colluded with the Trump campaign on behalf of Russia" because the actual Mueller found none.

Former special counsel Robert Mueller pushed back against U.S. President Donald Trump’s characterizations of his 22-month investigation, telling lawmakers on Wednesday that he did not evaluate “collusion” with the Russian government, and confirming that his report did not conclude that there was “no obstruction” of the probe.

“The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed,” Mueller told the House judiciary committee, adding that Trump could theoretically be indicted after he leaves office.

“We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”

Mueller refutes Trump’s ‘no collusion, no obstruction’ line

‘We focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.’

www.politico.eu

 

[Dog 2.0]

Dog is hanging his hat on the word "collusion", and no one has been charged with that crime*.

To be fair, it really wasn't. To me, collusion suggests both parties are sophisticated enough to maximize benefit from the transaction. Or, at least make it comparable.

In reality, the defeated ex-President and his campaign were duped. They were used. They were played. And, it seems Dog is okay with that.

Just don't use the word "collusion".



















*Yes, I know it's not a crime.

Just be accurate. Not clear to me how they were "duped" "used" or "played" by the Russians but if you can make the case, fine, go with that.

 

[Dog 2.0]

Former special counsel Robert Mueller pushed back against U.S. President Donald Trump’s characterizations of his 22-month investigation, telling lawmakers on Wednesday that he did not evaluate “collusion” with the Russian government, and confirming that his report did not conclude that there was “no obstruction” of the probe.

“The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed,” Mueller told the House judiciary committee, adding that Trump could theoretically be indicted after he leaves office.

“We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”

Mueller refutes Trump’s ‘no collusion, no obstruction’ line

‘We focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.’

www.politico.eu

Such weasel words. In America one does not need to be exculpated for mere allegations.

 

[Sol Rosenberg]

Such weasel words. In America one does not need to be exculpated for mere allegations.

Okay bullshitter.

 

[phillysailor]

Such weasel words. In America one does not need to be exculpated for mere allegations.

Once again, Dog doesn’t understand the difference between an investigation and a trial.

 

[Olsonist]

Such weasel words. In America one does not need to be exculpated for mere allegations.

No, but you'll admit it raises an interesting question.

 

[Bus Driver]

Once again, Dog doesn’t understand the difference between an investigation and a trial.

Without a conviction, what good is an investigation?

 

[Dog 2.0]

Once again, Dog doesn’t understand the difference between an investigation and a trial.

And yet, it remains the case that in America one does not need to be exculpated for mere allegations.

 

[Steam Flyer]

Once again, Dog doesn’t understand the difference between an investigation and a trial.

Without a conviction, what good is an investigation?

Well, capitalism. That particular investigation made a profit of millions for us taxpayers!

 

[Swimsailor]

And yet, it remains the case that in America one does not need to be exculpated for mere allegations.

Well, Trump now has an actual conviction. Hunter still just has allegations. Yet you and the rest of the RWNJ'S have already convicted him. Why the double standard?

 

[Sol Rosenberg]

Well, Trump now has an actual conviction. Hunter still just has allegations. Yet you and the rest of the RWNJ'S have already convicted him. Why the double standard?

Hunter has confessed, has he not? He’s a democRAT!

 

[Bus Driver]

Hunter has confessed, has he not? He’s a democRAT!

He need not confess. He is a Demoncrat. That's all that is needed.

 

[Blue Crab]

I hope TFG doesn't start posting dick pics.

 

[Raz'r]

I hope TFG doesn't start posting dick pics.

How would we know what it was? It can't see daylight anymore.

 

[badlatitude]

And yet, it remains the case that in America one does not need to be exculpated for mere allegations.

But her emails.

 

[Blue Crab]

But her emails.

If Hillary starts identifying as non-binary, is it they emails or them emails?

 

[badlatitude]

If Hillary starts identifying as non-binary, is it they emails or them emails?

Doz emails.

 

[Bus Driver]

I'd go with them's emails. Possessive possessive.

 

[Ishmael]

 

[El Borracho]

Heartening that Hunter’s Laptop is all that MAGA seems to have. A pathetically small weapon for a revolution, even if completely true. Even if expanded to a bigger deal. I say we keep their attention on that shiny object for another 6 years.