Uh... Last i checked etnz is getting PAID for a whole shit ton to f that stuff - not just doing it with their AC team like you are implying.
INEOS Team GB
- Thread starter Stingray~
- Start date
JALhazmat
Super Anarchist
all On the smallest budget ever used for a cup cycle too… ;-)
ChairborneRanger
Member
and? My point is that they are capable of actually doing stuff.
INEOS do not seem capable of even putting a usable boat in the water.
dg_sailingfan
Super Anarchist
@JALhazmat 's CHAOS TEAM will be out of the 37th America's Cup by the end of 2023. Another CoR will bite the dust just like Mascalzone Latino during AC34 and the Aussie Team in AC35.
BYE, BYE Ben!
BYE, BYE Ben!
JALhazmat
Super Anarchist
👍🙄
JALhazmat
Super Anarchist
Where is your team? Mr “GBR sail Gp team logo”
Monkey
Super Anarchist
- 11,231
- 2,851
So just to sum things up, Team ADD is wasting their time building a useless hydrogen boat that they only drag out on occasion, had to waste resources replacing the nose on the AC40, built a land racer, had to sell the hosting rights just to stay afloat, but finally got back on the water, are a good example of a happy team. You’ve gotta be shitting me. I’ll admit, Grant is doing a hell of a job even getting a boat out there. Who knows, they may even win.
Regarding Ineos, this is where FourIdiot would babble on about simulators.
Forourselves
Super Anarchist
The Irony... This entire comment is complete and utter rambling nonsensical bullshit from yet another know nothing, fake, so called "commentator" as Magnus Weatley likes to call you folk. You and the other clown JAL are nothing but internet trolls.
Still, the team keeps proving you idiots wrong time and time again, and you come back bitching, crying and moaning about a team of people who clearly have more to offer the sport than you could ever dream of having.
Keep crying like a little girl. We'll keep winning.
Monkey
Super Anarchist
- 11,231
- 2,851
So is your “simulator “ argument that you’ve stuck to religiously right or wrong?
Forourselves
Super Anarchist
TBH i can't even remember... however if we're talking simulators, there's no doubt simulators were and are the most cost effective and efficient use of resource. AC35, 36 and 37 have proved that.
Monkey
Super Anarchist
- 11,231
- 2,851
So you’re saying Ineos is in great shape?
Forourselves
Super Anarchist
First of all, You're assuming they have a simulator.
Also it depends on how good their simulator is (obvioulsy) Team NZ's simulator is obviously effective, INEOS's simulator not so much.
So obviously good simulators are effective. Bad simulators aren't.
Pretty simple really.
Fast boats win
Slow boats don't.
Good simulators are effective tools
Bad simulators are ineffective tools.
In general, yes, simulators are the most cost effective and efficient use of resource.
Its why the Aerospace industry uses them, and why the AC teams now use them.
Is Ineos in great shape? Who knows. History says no, Optimism says possibly.
Last edited:
JALhazmat
Super Anarchist
complains about people making assumptions about TNZ..
proceeds to make numerous assumptions about INEOS
slow hand clap . Well done4/Steve
proceeds to make numerous assumptions about INEOS
slow hand clap . Well done4/Steve
The_Alchemist
Super Anarchist
You guys are letting 4shit hijack ever thread by filling it with your responses to him. Just ignore him and be done with the nonsense. We all know it is useless to try to argue with the idiot!
Forourselves
Super Anarchist
The difference is, I have something to base my assumption on. And its called history. The British Challenger has never been able to build a fast boat. Not once. Not under Lipton, not under Peter Harrison and not under Ben Ainslie. Every boat Ainslie has built and raced thus far has been a dog. Every campaign he's run has had management and decision making issues. And so far, nothing has transpired to convince anyone otherwise.
The fact is, Ainslies current challenge so far looks to be heading the same way as his last 2.
The only thing you have to base your assumptions on regarding Team NZ are debunked, stupid conspiracy theories you've made up in your stupid little mind.
Last edited:
JALhazmat
Super Anarchist
You assumed they dont have a sim
you then make assumptions about it’s effectiveness
so contradicting yourself and then making assumptions about something current effectiveness based on no idea of the current capabilities of a sim you assumed they don’t have..
you then make assumptions about it’s effectiveness
so contradicting yourself and then making assumptions about something current effectiveness based on no idea of the current capabilities of a sim you assumed they don’t have..
Forourselves
Super Anarchist
No I did not assume they don't have a sim.
What I said is their sim hasn't worked effectively to date.
That much is fact.
I have NEVER said INEOS don't have a sim.
Wrong again sunshine.
Last edited:
JALhazmat
Super Anarchist
Exhibit A
your first line. You are assuming the contra position to monkey
you are assuming they don’t have a sim
then you go to speculation with how good it is.
the only FACT is that no one actually knows because no one on here has seen it’s lasted itereation
so sunshine you are guessing at best.
your first line. You are assuming the contra position to monkey
you are assuming they don’t have a sim
then you go to speculation with how good it is.
the only FACT is that no one actually knows because no one on here has seen it’s lasted itereation
so sunshine you are guessing at best.
Forourselves
Super Anarchist
SMH. Where in that little "Exhibit" does it say anywhere that I said "INEOS does not have a sim"?
Wrong again sunshine.
JALhazmat
Super Anarchist
You said
“First of all, you‘re assuming they have a simulator”
how do you explain it
“First of all, you‘re assuming they have a simulator”
how do you explain it
