Correct.Both boats have J-bulbs, single rudders, and no water ballast. Any difference in configuration would be their sails.
Correct.Both boats have J-bulbs, single rudders, and no water ballast. Any difference in configuration would be their sails.
Gybe angles at 174-177 TWA in 14-29 TWS ?????? Really?????? Or am I not understanding how ORC works (being an IRC man)??
ORC does the same thing to many asym boats... unrealistic downwind angles.Gybe angles at 174-177 TWA in 14-29 TWS ?????? Really?????? Or am I not understanding how ORC works (being an IRC man)??
Some of the models are a bit flawed, and VPP needs to be calibrated. Typically I add 4% to most speed figures and adjust VMG angles downwind. Curves are pretty "flat" downwind so basically you just dial down the angles beyond the "real" TWA. I would guess the J/99 starts at 135 in light air and ends up at TWA 160 in TWS 16-18, then planing at TWA 150 until things explode :lol:Gybe angles at 174-177 TWA in 14-29 TWS ?????? Really?????? Or am I not understanding how ORC works (being an IRC man)??
Looks worse than it is, as the VPP undersetimates speed at real target TWA B)ORC does the same thing to many asym boats... unrealistic downwind angles.
i don't disagree - i was just commenting on the issue with the VPP and downwind angles.Looks worse than it is, as the VPP undersetimates speed at real target TWA B)
ORC actually rates J/boats pretty fair.
So 3 main differences.
Yes, that.ORC does the same thing to many asym boats... unrealistic downwind angles.
ORR is pretty bad too
I guess we're doing it wrong with target TWA of 158 at 14 kts and 160 at 16?1. The ORC downwind VPP numbers are crap - it has, for example forecast optimum VMG run TWA of 180 for some poled boats. And the J would be unlikely to ever sail deeper than 155 TWA.
To be fair, Blur has a much longer sprit and higher boat speeds, so it would seem that the best TWA for the J/99 should be smaller than the J/111, no?I guess we're doing it wrong with target TWA of 158 at 14 kts and 160 at 16?
But we only put 10 years into it.
The ORC consists of a number of THEORETICAL models that ASSUMES perfect sail shapes for EVERY ANGLE and tries to approximate performance in boats from 20 to 200'. It's hard to nail the exact sweetspot VMG downwind, and that's not what you use the polars for.
If you just look at the actual VMG number, it's pretty close to the real number (just at TWA 155 instead of TWA 175). But that doesn't really matter for rating or routing purposes.
J Boats writes an article about how their new boat is great. Sure would be nice if there was knowledgeable, independent and critical journalism in Sail-World rather than advertisers writing their own copy or paying insider social media influencers to hype what should stand on their own merit.Sail-World has a write-up on J99 victory in the double-handed division of the Sydney-Hobart.
The "fully powered soaking angles" have been pretty similar on both J/109 and J/111, and also sailing the J/99 Calypso. Even the J/70 end up at TWA 160+. Biggest difference between designs are when wou're in stable soaking mode and when you start planing.To be fair, Blur has a much longer sprit and higher boat speeds, so it would seem that the best TWA for the J/99 should be smaller than the J/111, no?
Or maybe the boat really is great. The performance of the two J99s in the SH was impressive.J Boats writes an article about how their new boat is great. Sure would be nice if there was knowledgeable, independent and critical journalism in Sail-World rather than advertisers writing their own copy or paying insider social media influencers to hype what should stand on their own merit.
To be fair, the article is attributed to J-Boats in the by-line, so no attempt to pretend…J Boats writes an article about how their new boat is great. Sure would be nice if there was knowledgeable, independent and critical journalism in Sail-World rather than advertisers writing their own copy or paying insider social media influencers to hype what should stand on their own merit.
No doubt great boats that really make sense. The J99 that sail near me in Alameda is very cool and is a witch on points of sail. Would love to catch a ride on one soon. It is my hope to charter one in France this summer for a weekend or more.Or maybe the boat really is great. The performance of the two J99s in the SH was impressive.
Your posts (here and elsewhere) are usually down on the costs of the sport but compared to most of the SH programs, the J99 guys did it pretty affordably. Stock boats, paneled sails in Disko's case, etc.
As an aside, I sold my J Boat for 88% of what I paid for it 16 years previously*. You know how much I raced it, and where. I think that's a great value compared to what I would have spent on other equipment-heavy pastimes.
* I sold it in 2018 (pre-Covid boat market). I probably could have gotten 100% or more today.
Too true! Ironically it’s these very same forums that is killing off sailing journals, and hence real journalists, as news and information travels faster via the forum than waiting for the magazine to be published…No doubt great boats that really make sense. The J99 that sail near me in Alameda is very cool and is a witch on points of sail. Would love to catch a ride on one soon. It is my hope to charter one in France this summer for a weekend or more.
Your old J boat was pretty sweet too. I am sure the new owners are thrilled to have her. Covid has made things interesting through out the entire boat market as those who can afford a new or good boat have done well throughout it - I am quite certain that the boat I bought in early 2019 I could sell now for twice what I paid.
My point is that press releases are often seen as informative news. I like my news to come from more independent sources. That is why I like this forum because much of what we read here comes from differing view points.