Forourselves
Super Anarchist
Last edited by a moderator:
Who says these weren't settled in the design process? These look more hula than pie warmer.Not really impressed with the LR add-ons. You'd have thought crew windage considerations would've been settled and sorted way back in the design process.
Unless Max comes out to tell us, we don't know. It might have something to do with both helms standing quite proud when performing flight duties. The flight controller seems to be, or was, mounted at gunnel level - which I thought was a bit high, and quite a contrast to the in cockpit controls on TR.Who says these weren't settled in the design process?
It does seem to be a kludge to achieve what ETNZ has (aero-wise) with the shape of its deck.
Seems a very logical idea which doesn’t take a genius to come up with the concept.
Did you get the tat when you lost your leg?
Like the cockpit fairings, looks a lot meaner now!View attachment 418518
Another pic, more frontal, from Luna Rossa Facebook page. The windshields are clearly visible. Black rudder, no backstays.
Is this the first overlapping headsail we’ve seen that isn’t a code zero?
where are these interpretations found?Anyone notice the latest class interpretation suggests that the supplied running backstays can't be removed?
http://noticeboard.acofficials.org/ac75-class/class-interpretationswhere are these interpretations found?
That’s a good game of guess the team