Cracker race that one Weta.Out of interest I just re-watched Race 1 from the ACWS, LRPP vs ETNZ.
PB controlled Jimmy in the start box, led off the line and then took off over the horizon.
It was domination, a 1.2km lead after the first lap!
I wonder how much of that gap Luna Rossa has made up by now??
Is the machete for the pig or just the pizza? That would be funny to see down at the viaduct in a flash restaurant, the "Long Pig". Might rival Fergburger in Queenstown with 100m queuesThis hand made wood fired Fijian pizza oven is for long pig pizza, it's truly delicious I must confess.
PM me for the recipe, you will need a sharp machete though...
Just for the long pig actually.Is the machete for the pig or just the pizza? That would be funny to see down at the viaduct in a flash restaurant, the "Long Pig". Might rival Fergburger in Queenstown with 100m queues
Your papa ain't your papa but your papa don't knowBack in 2000 we estimated at least 60% of the married team members were having affairs. Their families were here too.
I think the twin helm is a concept which requires lots of racing experience to be refined and become effective. In the ACWS and RR we could all see that this approach was inferior to the more traditional Ben Ainslie - Giles Scott duo mostly due to poor communication and two brains that aren't really "aligned" when put under pressure. My hot take is that the RR races against Ineos were predominantly lost not on boat performance but communication/tactical/decision errors, which were the manifestation of the teething issues of the twin helm. After learning from the mistakes of the RR and the experience gained in the semi-finals the twin helm is becoming much more effective, with Checco and JS being not only better in communication but also in terms of synergy between the two.There is a lot of talk now about the twin Helmsman approach as one of the key reasons Luna Rossa is winning races. They copped a lot of criticism early about this but it makes you wonder? They may have found a small advantage? Extra Grinders too over Ineos but nobody saying that's an advantage?
It seems the fewer grinders were not an issue for INEOS, not even in such a close quarter combat as the third race. In addition, on ITUK, they work in a more efficient way and so the difference is smaller than the mere men count.There is a lot of talk now about the twin Helmsman approach as one of the key reasons Luna Rossa is winning races. They copped a lot of criticism early about this but it makes you wonder? They may have found a small advantage? Extra Grinders too over Ineos but nobody saying that's an advantage?
9 minutes ago, strider470 said:
Jimmy trying the starts at the simulator.
Maybe a grinder, Checco is smaller than a leg of Bud Spencer!Fantastico haha
Does this mean Checco Bruni is Bud Spencer?
Don't forget the increased role that Pietro Sibello is taking on in observing conditions around the boat and facilitating communications - I think this is an essential ingredient in the effectiveness of the twin helm conceptI think the twin helm is a concept which requires lots of racing experience to be refined and become effective. In the ACWS and RR we could all see that this approach was inferior to the more traditional Ben Ainslie - Giles Scott duo mostly due to poor communication and two brains that aren't really "aligned" when put under pressure. My hot take is that the RR races against Ineos were predominantly lost not on boat performance but communication/tactical/decision errors, which were the manifestation of the teething issues of the twin helm. After learning from the mistakes of the RR and the experience gained in the semi-finals the twin helm is becoming much more effective, with Checco and JS being not only better in communication but also in terms of synergy between the two.
Yes I suspect so, and a few extra "the boyz did a great job today" and "there is still more on the table" have been added in. Must be worth a knot or two!It seems that Jimmy, by contract, is not allowed to say “at the end of the day” more than twice a day (three times during weekends and bank holidays) and never in public, in particular at press conferences. Is this the biggest improvement in LR communications everybody is talking about?
Pietro Sibello’s new advice in the decision loop aboard lR is being touted as an improvement, and maybe it is. But on that count (tactics) I suspect that JS’s long-time coach Philippe Presti is playing an even bigger role, including for in prestart set plays. Max has alluded to him too.Don't forget the increased role that Pietro Sibello is taking on in observing conditions around the boat and facilitating communications - I think this is an essential ingredient in the effectiveness of the twin helm concept
I think both helms are really starting to gel now, much better talk between them, and they're not saying "copy" all the time :lol:At the end of the day... FORZA LUNA, FORZA JIMMY