Next Next-Generation Future Airliner - Boeing Commits to Proof-of-Concept Build

Boathavn

Hof & Gammel Dansk - Skål !
Boeing thinks it has found the key to a 30% reduction in fuel use.



Generally, a 20% improvement in fuel economy defines a generational shift in airliner design.

Boeing has bit the bullet and will build a full-sized proof-of-concept demonstrator.

Courtesy of New Atlas (newatlas.com)

Boeing to build braced-wing airliner, shooting for 30% efficiency gain

By Loz Blain
January 30, 2023
NASA has awarded Boeing US$425 million towards building and testing a full-sized prototype of its transonic truss-braced wing airliner concept
NASA has awarded Boeing US$425 million towards building and testing a full-sized prototype of its transonic truss-braced wing airliner concept
Boeing

With a US$425-million cash injection from NASA, Boeing will build and test a full-sized airliner based on its transonic truss-braced wing (TTBW) concept, using long, thin, strut-braced wings to add lift, reduce drag, and burn an impressive 30% less fuel.

When you burn as much fuel as an airline does, a single-digit fuel efficiency tweak adds up to massive savings. Take the drag-reducing Aeroshark film Swiss Airlines has stuck all over its 12 Boeing 777s – it delivers a 1% efficiency gain, and as a result, over just 12 aircraft, Swiss expects to use 4,800 tonnes less jet fuel every year, saving nearly half a million dollars per year, per plane at today's prices. That'd be closer to half a billion a year for an operator like American Airlines, closing in on 1,000 planes in its fleet, from a 1% efficiency gain.
So you can see how an airliner 30% more efficient than today's best single-aisle machines could be a bit of a big deal. We first ran across Boeing's "truss-braced wing" design concept back in 2010, as a part of the "Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research" (SUGAR) Volt concept it designed as part of a NASA research program.
The idea takes advantage of the higher lift and lower drag you get with longer, slimmer, high aspect ratio wings – the sort you might find on an unpowered glider. A concept Boeing was testing in 2016, for example, had wings some 50% wider than comparable standard aircraft.
Structurally, that kind of thing simply doesn't work without reinforcement. So Boeing's design hangs the wings from the top of the fuselage, and braces them with long trusses coming up from the belly of the plane. These too are carefully shaped airfoils, adding extra lift as well as strength and stability.
1675186946433.png
The extra-long, slim wings generate extra lift while reducing drag. NASA and Boeing are hoping to see a 30% reduction in fuel burn as a result
Boeing
As a subsonic concept cruising at around Mach 0.70 to 0.75 (519 to 556 mph, 835 to 895 km/h), Boeing estimated these braced-wing airliners could burn 50% less fuel than a regular plane. In 2019, the concept was redesigned to cruise at the edge of transonic speed, around Mach 0.8 (593 mph, 955 km/h), and whether because of the added speed or simply from a better understanding of the aerodynamics, Boeing has walked the efficiency claims back.
"When combined with expected advancements in propulsion systems, materials and systems architecture," reads a Boeing press release, "a single-aisle airplane with a TTBW configuration could reduce fuel consumption and emissions up to 30% relative to today's most efficient single-aisle airplanes, depending on the mission."
It's been a long time in digital modeling and subscale wind tunnel testing, but NASA has now awarded Boeing funding through the SFD Space Act agreement to the tune of $425 million, to be thrown in with some $725 million from Boeing and various other business partners, to actually go and build the thing at full scale and get it properly flight tested.
NASA says it plans to complete testing on the Transonic Truss-Braced Wing demonstrator aircraft "by the late 2020s, so that technologies and designs demonstrated by the project can inform industry decisions about the next generation of single-aisle aircraft that could enter into service in the 2030s."
1675187043520.png
Under development for more than a decade, the truss-braced wing concept has been extensively tested in CFD and at subscale in wind tunnels
NASA
There will certainly be challenges. For starters, these super-long wings might simply not fit with existing airport terminals or hangars. Boeing hasn't said anything about the demonstrator aircraft, but on the 2019 concept it spoke of using foldable wings to get around this issue on the ground.
And then there's the fact that the huge, thick, lower aspect ratio wings on standard airliners create a perfect hollow space for their fuel tanks. Keeping the fuel out in the wings places a lot of weight out wide, closer to the center of lift, reducing engineering stresses where the wings meet the body. It contributes to safety somewhat in a crash, keeping burning fuel further from the passengers. And from a pure brass-tacks perspective, it frees up room in the cabin for extra money-making seats. The truss-braced design uses such slim wings that fuel tanks will likely have to go back into the fuselage.
On the other hand, Boeing says that the high-mounted, braced wings "could eventually accommodate advanced propulsion systems that are limited by a lack of underwing space in today's low-wing airplane configurations" – although this demonstrator won't be testing any fancy new motors straight away.
And it goes without saying, anything that can take planes further on a given amount of energy has exceptional relevance to decarbonization efforts. Battery-electric, hydrogen-electric, hydrogen-combustion, ammonia and other clean powertrain technologies are all constrained by lower range figures than traditional jet fuel power, and designs like these could definitely make a big contribution.



A good technical explainer:

 

Raz'r

Super Anarchist
64,069
6,423
De Nile
Boeing thinks it has found the key to a 30% reduction in fuel use.



Generally, a 20% improvement in fuel economy defines a generational shift in airliner design.

Boeing has bit the bullet and will build a full-sized proof-of-concept demonstrator.

Courtesy of New Atlas (newatlas.com)

Boeing to build braced-wing airliner, shooting for 30% efficiency gain

By Loz Blain
January 30, 2023
NASA has awarded Boeing US$425 million towards building and testing a full-sized prototype of its transonic truss-braced wing airliner concept
NASA has awarded Boeing US$425 million towards building and testing a full-sized prototype of its transonic truss-braced wing airliner concept
Boeing

With a US$425-million cash injection from NASA, Boeing will build and test a full-sized airliner based on its transonic truss-braced wing (TTBW) concept, using long, thin, strut-braced wings to add lift, reduce drag, and burn an impressive 30% less fuel.

When you burn as much fuel as an airline does, a single-digit fuel efficiency tweak adds up to massive savings. Take the drag-reducing Aeroshark film Swiss Airlines has stuck all over its 12 Boeing 777s – it delivers a 1% efficiency gain, and as a result, over just 12 aircraft, Swiss expects to use 4,800 tonnes less jet fuel every year, saving nearly half a million dollars per year, per plane at today's prices. That'd be closer to half a billion a year for an operator like American Airlines, closing in on 1,000 planes in its fleet, from a 1% efficiency gain.
So you can see how an airliner 30% more efficient than today's best single-aisle machines could be a bit of a big deal. We first ran across Boeing's "truss-braced wing" design concept back in 2010, as a part of the "Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research" (SUGAR) Volt concept it designed as part of a NASA research program.
The idea takes advantage of the higher lift and lower drag you get with longer, slimmer, high aspect ratio wings – the sort you might find on an unpowered glider. A concept Boeing was testing in 2016, for example, had wings some 50% wider than comparable standard aircraft.
Structurally, that kind of thing simply doesn't work without reinforcement. So Boeing's design hangs the wings from the top of the fuselage, and braces them with long trusses coming up from the belly of the plane. These too are carefully shaped airfoils, adding extra lift as well as strength and stability.
The extra-long, slim wings generate extra lift while reducing drag. NASA and Boeing are hoping to see a 30% reduction in fuel burn as a result
Boeing
As a subsonic concept cruising at around Mach 0.70 to 0.75 (519 to 556 mph, 835 to 895 km/h), Boeing estimated these braced-wing airliners could burn 50% less fuel than a regular plane. In 2019, the concept was redesigned to cruise at the edge of transonic speed, around Mach 0.8 (593 mph, 955 km/h), and whether because of the added speed or simply from a better understanding of the aerodynamics, Boeing has walked the efficiency claims back.
"When combined with expected advancements in propulsion systems, materials and systems architecture," reads a Boeing press release, "a single-aisle airplane with a TTBW configuration could reduce fuel consumption and emissions up to 30% relative to today's most efficient single-aisle airplanes, depending on the mission."
It's been a long time in digital modeling and subscale wind tunnel testing, but NASA has now awarded Boeing funding through the SFD Space Act agreement to the tune of $425 million, to be thrown in with some $725 million from Boeing and various other business partners, to actually go and build the thing at full scale and get it properly flight tested.
NASA says it plans to complete testing on the Transonic Truss-Braced Wing demonstrator aircraft "by the late 2020s, so that technologies and designs demonstrated by the project can inform industry decisions about the next generation of single-aisle aircraft that could enter into service in the 2030s."
Under development for more than a decade, the truss-braced wing concept has been extensively tested in CFD and at subscale in wind tunnels
NASA
There will certainly be challenges. For starters, these super-long wings might simply not fit with existing airport terminals or hangars. Boeing hasn't said anything about the demonstrator aircraft, but on the 2019 concept it spoke of using foldable wings to get around this issue on the ground.
And then there's the fact that the huge, thick, lower aspect ratio wings on standard airliners create a perfect hollow space for their fuel tanks. Keeping the fuel out in the wings places a lot of weight out wide, closer to the center of lift, reducing engineering stresses where the wings meet the body. It contributes to safety somewhat in a crash, keeping burning fuel further from the passengers. And from a pure brass-tacks perspective, it frees up room in the cabin for extra money-making seats. The truss-braced design uses such slim wings that fuel tanks will likely have to go back into the fuselage.
On the other hand, Boeing says that the high-mounted, braced wings "could eventually accommodate advanced propulsion systems that are limited by a lack of underwing space in today's low-wing airplane configurations" – although this demonstrator won't be testing any fancy new motors straight away.
And it goes without saying, anything that can take planes further on a given amount of energy has exceptional relevance to decarbonization efforts. Battery-electric, hydrogen-electric, hydrogen-combustion, ammonia and other clean powertrain technologies are all constrained by lower range figures than traditional jet fuel power, and designs like these could definitely make a big contribution.



A good technical explainer:


longer runways needed?
 

El Borracho

Barkeeper’s Friend
7,288
3,215
Pacific Rim
Boeing 172?

Yeah, long takeoff roll. Maybe huge engines can compensate. More flap and slat stuff in the wings. What they left out of the sales pitch is that the pax will be standing like in a subway train.
 

Sidecar

…………………………
3,479
1,845
Tasmania
The flexing wings look like an invitation for fatigue fractures..... Pretty cool if it works though.
Most aircraft have flexing wings. To a greater or lesser degree.

At the end of the day, a wing is like a mast, fully cantilevered, it needs to be a lot thicker. Prop it with a strut and reduce panel length, it can be a lot thinner for the same strength/flex.

If you can make the prop a wing as well, with lots of dihedral for roll stability, the main wing doesn’t need any, making it more efficient again. The prop wing doesn’t have a tip vortex, like a conventional bi plane, because it is absorbed by the larger wing. Another gain.

Etc, etc…..
 

Mrleft8

Super Anarchist
28,089
4,366
Suwanee River
I understand that all wings flex. They have to. It's the fluttering, like the "wings" on a manta ray that got to me.
I don't understand aerodynamics, but I can see that in a wind tunnel with the force coming from a steady direction would be very different from a wind sheer, or gusty cross wind situation.
 

Ease the sheet.

ignoring stupid people is easy
21,065
2,698
Commercial pipe dream.

Boeing taking more government money.

It may well show a big improvement in fuel efficiency.

But it will not lead to a large commercial aircraft.
 
That's why it's called "proof of concept"

Remember when monoplanes would never work because of the structural impossibility of no guy wires?
I've not said my age in the "how old is everybody" thread but I'm not that old!

My comment was more in relation to corporate inertia and the cost of certification. Big aerospace follows the money these days and not the dream.
 

Talchotali

Capt. Marvel's Wise Friend
935
598
Vancouverium BC
When bored on a flight, I always like to pull out the Safety Card and look at the "In the Event of Water Landing" pictograms. The ones for a high wing ATR-42, De Havilland Crash-8 or BAE-146 always struck me as awfully optimistic.

For this truss design, I think it will either be a really good or a really bad outcome. Curious to see the end result.

Apparently, they can simulate this in hydro test pools. Here is a Russian TVRS-44 (Let-610 based design) set up for high-wing ditch testing.

1675277725359.png



1675278208592.png
 


Latest posts





Top