Now that Musk owns Twitter

[Bus Driver]

Well, we know the FBI had the laptop for almost a year prior to planting the Russian disinformation hoax. So, it was sometime between December 2019 and October 2020 that elements within the FBI went rouge and acted to influence our election.

Why would Trump's FBI do that?

Oh, and I see you are alleging they used makeup.

 

[badlatitude]

Well, we know the FBI had the laptop for almost a year prior to planting the Russian disinformation hoax. So, it was sometime between December 2019 and October 2020 that elements within the FBI went rouge and acted to influence our election.

Trump was president during those dates, and he loaded the agency with partisans; how do you figure closely-watched liberals pulled that off?

 

[billsreef]

Sorry, I'm an aussie just trying to understand.
The position is that the Biden FBI, the head of which was appointed by Trump, concealed information about Biden's son's laptop, back when Biden was just a private citizen, in order to get Biden elected President?

You understand perfectly. Dog is using RWNJ logic, i.e. reality is irrelevant.

 

[Bus Driver]

You understand perfectly. Dog is using RWNJ logic, i.e. reality is irrelevant.

Dog logic. It runs counter to the logic most people use.

 

[Dog 2.0]

Sorry, I'm an aussie just trying to understand.
The position is that the Biden FBI, the head of which was appointed by Trump, concealed information about Biden's son's laptop, back when Biden was just a private citizen, in order to get Biden elected President?

The FBI not just concealed but disseminated a false "Russian disinformation" cover story (thank you Elon) that many contributors to these pages swallowed hook line and sinker. Now you can focus on who was president and who appointed who or you can focus on what they did.

 

[Dog 2.0]

How big of a dumbass are you?

Our own government RUNS our elections. Who else?

The question is, can a President (or state governor, sec/state, etc) use their governmental authority to affect the results of an election? In the past, the answer has been resoundingly NO from Americans, now the answer is resoundingly YES from Republicans.

And yet in the last two presidential elections the meddling has been on behalf of the Democratic candidate.

 

[Se7en]

The FBI not just concealed but disseminated a false "Russian disinformation" cover story (thank you Elon) that many contributors to these pages swallowed hook line and sinker. Now you can focus on who was president and who appointed who or you can focus on what they did.

So why did the guy that Trump appointed withold the info about the laptop?
Was it because he was a Biden shill? Or because what he knew of the laptop and who had handled it made him unsure of what was true?

 

[Dog 2.0]

Trump’s Own Appointees Reportedly Opened Criminal Investigation Into Him As Part Of Durham Russia Probe​

Take your complaints to Durham. When Durham and Barr started talking about the special investigation leading to possible criminal charges, this was why.

Poor doggy

And what were the financial crimes you contend were revealed?

 

[Dog 2.0]

Trump was president during those dates, and he loaded the agency with partisans; how do you figure closely-watched liberals pulled that off?

And yet they did. And the libs on this forum don't seem bothered by it.

 

[Dog 2.0]

So why did the guy that Trump appointed withold the info about the laptop?
Was it because he was a Biden shill? Or because what he knew of the laptop and who had handled it made him unsure of what was true?

The first one. And it wasn't just withholding the truth, it was disseminating a lie.

 

[Se7en]

The first one. And it wasn't just withholding the truth, it was disseminating a lie.

So why did Trump appoint a Biden shill? He seems to have gone overboard in other areas to appoint trump loyalists reguardless of capability.

 

[Dog 2.0]

So why did Trump appoint a Biden shill? He seems to have gone overboard in other areas to appoint trump loyalists reguardless of capability.

You would have to ask him.

 

[phillysailor]

And what were the financial crimes you contend were revealed?

I contended nothing of the sort. Your boy Barr and Durham did. Ask them

 

[phillysailor]

And yet in the last two presidential elections the meddling has been on behalf of the Democratic candidate.

Sure, if you overlook Comeys last minute “whoops more emails!” And Trump trying to decapitate the DOJ to push his agenda.

If you can’t stand law enforcement and national security agencies investigating your nominee and warning media against disinformation he and his minions are pushing, then you need to back a better candidate.

You lost, dipshit. Figure out why and stop whining about how unfair it was.

What a wuss

 

[badlatitude]

And yet they did. And the libs on this forum don't seem bothered by it.

I am not bothered because when I Google the info you assert, the results come up without any mainstream sourcing. So naturally, you are entitled to believe whatever you want but don't expect people to flock to agree with wrong conclusions.

 

[Steam Flyer]

And yet in the last two presidential elections the meddling has been on behalf of the Democratic candidate.

And yet there is no actual, factual evidence of this. It's amazing what masterminds those Democrats are!

 

[Bus Driver]

And yet there is no actual, factual evidence of this. It's amazing what masterminds those Democrats are!

Not only did they meddle in the Presidential election of 2020, leading to a Biden win, they made sure that Republicans GAINED in national and state elections that year and 2022.

Those Demmycrats are just so fucking good at what they do.

 

[Steam Flyer]

Not only did they meddle in the Presidential election of 2020, leading to a Biden win, they made sure that Republicans GAINED in national and state elections that year and 2022.

Those Demmycrats are just so fucking good at what they do.

I wonder if George Santos is Dog2.

 

[phillysailor]

It’s almost as if voters don’t like serial bankruptcy types who spread lies, hate on democracy, cheat on their wives and abandon our allies.

If @Dog 2.0 would back a better candidate, endorse pro-America policies then maybe his white male ticket could win elections.

 

[Dog 2.0]

I contended nothing of the sort. Your boy Barr and Durham did. Ask them

Yes you did ... post 3541